Comparative Effects of Argumentation and Laboratory Experiments on Metacognition, Attitudes, and Science Process Skills of Primary School Children
Abstract
Full Text:
DOWNLOAD PDFReferences
Anagün, Ş. S., & Yaşar, Ş. (2009). İlköğretim beşinci sınıf fen ve teknoloji dersinde bilimsel süreç becerilerinin geliştirilmesi [Developing scientific process skills at science and technology course in fifth grade students]. İlköğretim Online, 8(3), 843-865.
Aslan, S. (2016). Argümantasyona dayalı laboratuar uygulamaları: Bilimsel süreç becerilerine ve laboratuar dersine yönelik tutuma etkisi [Argumentation based activities in the laboratory: Effects on science process skills and attitudes towards laboratory course]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(4), 762-777.
Asterhan, C. S., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory. Journal of educational psychology, 99(3), 626.
Aydın, Ö., & Kaptan, F. (2014). Fen ve teknoloji öğretmen adaylarının eğitiminde argümantasyonun biliş üstü ve mantıksal düşünme becerilerine etkisi ve argümantasyona ilişkin görüşler [Effect of argumentation on metacognition and logical thinking abilities in science and technology teacher education and opinions about argumentation]. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 4(2), 163- 188.
Aydoğdu, B., Buldur, S., & Kartal, S. (2013). The effect of open-ended science experiments based on scenarios on the science process skills of the pre-service teachers. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1162-1168.
Bağ, H., & Çalık, M.(2017). A thematic review of argumentation studies at the K-8 level. Education and Science, 42(190), 281-303.
Bilen, K., & Aydoğdu, M. (2012). Tahmin et- gözle- açıkla (TGA) stratejisine dayalı laboratuar uygulamalarının öğrencilerin bilimsel süreç becerileri ve bilimin doğası hakkındaki düşünceleri üzerine etkisi [A study on the efficiency of predict-observe-explain strategy on general biology laboratory applications]. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 49-69.
Kırıkkaya, E. B. (2011). Grade 4 to 8 primary school students' attitudes towards science: Science enthusiasm. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(4), 374-382.
Celep, A., & Bacanak, A. (2013). Yüksek lisans yapan öğretmenlerin bilimsel süreç becerileri ve kazandırılması hakkındaki görüşleri [Perceptions of teachers who are attending on their master’s degree regarding the science process skills and their attainment]. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 10(1), 56-78.
Çetin, M. F., & Şahin-Taşkın, Ç. (2015). Sözlü dönütün ilkokul öğrencilerinin akademik başarı, derse yönelik tutum ve üstbilişsel farkındalığına etkisi [The effect of verbal feedback on primary school students' academic achievement, attitude towards the lesson and metacognitive awareness]. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Degisi, 29, 39-67.
Çınar, D., & Bayraktar, Ş. (2013). Argümantasyon temelli fen öğretiminin 5. Sınıf öğrencilerinin öğrenme ürünlerine etkisi [The effect of argumentation based science instruction on 5th grade students' learning outcomes] (Doctoral dissertation, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey). Retrieved from https://acikerisim.konya.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12452/782
Downing, J. E., & Filer, J. D. (1999). Science process skills and attitudes of pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11(2), 57-64.
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
Durmuş, J., & Bayraktar, Ş. (2010). Effects of conceptual change texts and laboratory experiments on fourth grade students’ understanding of matter and change concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(5), 498-504.
Erenler, S. (2017). Argüman temelli sorgulayıcı araştırma uygulamalarının fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının üstbilişsel farkındalık düzeyine ve yazma becerilerine olan etkilerinin incelenmesi [The effect of Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) method on pre-service science teachers' metacognitive awareness and scientific writing skills] (Master’s thesis, Abant İzzet Baysal University, Turkey).
Etkina, E., Karelina, A., & Ruibal-Villasenor, M. (2008). How long does it take? A study of student acquisition of scientific abilities. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 4(2), 1-15.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. Resnick (Eds.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
Freedman, M. P. (2001). The influence of laboratory instruction on science achievement and attitude toward science among ninth-grade students across gender differences. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED454070).
Gültepe, N., & Kilic, Z. (2015). Effect of scientific argumentation on the development of scientific process skills in the context of teaching chemistry. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(1), 111-132.
İpek., C., & Bayraktar, Ş. (2004). Aday öğretmenlerin fen bilimleri ve sosyal bilimlere bakışları [Prospective teachers' views on science and social sciences]. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1).
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792.
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2007). Argumentation in science education: an overview. In S. Erduran, & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 3-27). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Kalemkus, J., Bayraktar, Ş., & Çiftçi, S. (2019). Eğitimde sosyal, zihinsel ve sözlü-yazili bir aktivite: Argümantasyon [A social, mental and verbal-written activity in education: Argumentation]. Electronic Turkish Studies, 14(4).
Kanlı, U., & Yağbasan, R. (2008). 7E modeli merkezli laboratuvar yaklaşımının öğrencilerin bilimsel süreç becerilerini geliştirmedeki yeterliliği [The efficacy of the 7E learning cycle model based on laboratory approach on development of students’ science process skills]. Gazi Üniversitesi, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(1), 91-125.
Karakelle, S., & Saraç, S. (2007). Çocuklar için üst bilişsel farkındalık ölçeği (ÜBFÖ-Ç) A ve B formları: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması[Validity and factor structure of Turkish versions of the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory for Children (Jr. MAI) - A and B Forms]. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 10(20), 87-103.
Karakuş, M., & Yalçın, O. (2016). Fen eğitiminde argümantasyon temelli öğrenmenin akademik başarıya ve bilimsel süreç becerilerine etkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması [The effect of the argumentation-based learning in science education to the academic achievement and scientific process skills: A meta-analysis study]. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(2), 1-20.
Kıngır, S. (2011). Using the science writing heuristic approach to promote students understanding in chemical change and mixtures (Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Turkey). Retrieved from https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/21489
Kipnis, M., & Hofstein, A. (2008). The inquiry laboratory as a source for the development of metacognitive skills. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 601- 627.
Lazarou, D. (2010). Learning to TAP: An Effort to Scaffold Students’ Argumentation in Science. In G. Çakmakcı, & M. F. Taşar (Eds.), Contemporary Science Education Research: Scientific Literacy and Social Aspects of Science (pp. 43-50). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
NCREL (2003). enGauge 21st Century Skills for 21st Century Learners. Retrieved from http://www.cwasd.k12.wi.us/highschl/newsfile1062_1.pdf
Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Monk, M. (2001). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. School Science Review, 82(301), 63-70.
Özdener, N. (2005). Deneysel öğretim yöntemlerinde benzetişim (simulation) kullanımı [Use of simulations in experimental teaching methods]. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 4(4), 93-98.
Padilla, M. J. (1990). The science process skills. Research matters…to the science teacher. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED266961).
Pell, T., & Jarvis, T. (2001). Developing attitude to science scales for use with children of ages from five to eleven years. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 847-862.
Roberts, R., & Gott, R. (2010). A framework for practical work, argumentation and scientific literacy. In G. Çakmakcı, & M. F. Taşar (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: Scientific literacy and social aspects of science (pp. 99-105). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 235-260.
Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children's knowledge and regulation of cognition. Contemporary educational psychology, 27(1), 51-79.
Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument (3rd Ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Türkoguz, S., & Cin, M. (2014). Effects of argumentation-based concept cartoon activities on students' scientific process skills. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 10(2), 142-156.
Ulu, C., & Bayram, H. (2014). Araştırma sorgulamaya dayalı bilim yazma aracı kullanımının üstbilişsel bilgi ve becerilere etkisi [Effects of implementing inquiry based approach known as science writing heuristic on metacognitive awareness and skills]. Turkish International Journal of Special Education and Guidance & Counseling, 3(1), 68-80.
Ulu, C. (2019). Argümantasyon Tabanlı Bilim Öğrenme Yaklaşımına Dayalı Laboratuvar Uygulamalarının Üstbilişsel Bilgi ve Becerilere Etkisi [The Effects of Argumentation-Based Science Learning Approach Based Laboratory Applications on Metacognitive Knowledge and Skills]. Uluslararası Bilim ve Eğitim Dergisi, 2(1), 11-23.
Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101-131.
Yalçın Çelik, A., & Kılıç, Z. (2014). The impact of argumentation on high school chemistry students’ conceptual understanding, attitude towards chemistry and argumentativeness. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 6(1), 58-75.
Yang, K. Y., & Heh, J. S. (2007). The impact of internet virtual physics laboratory instruction on the achievement in physics, science process skills and computer attitudes of 10th-grade students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(4), 451-461.
Zeidan, A. H., & Jayosi, M. R. (2015). Science process skills and attitudes toward science among Palestinian secondary school students. World Journal of Education, 5(1), 13- 24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i2.27825
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jale KALEMKUŞ, Şule BAYRAKTAR, Sabahattin ÇİFTÇİ
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229 Bandung 40154, West Java, Indonesia