A Comparative Investigation of the Views of Preschool Teachers and Teacher Candidates about STEM
Abstract
If the STEM approach appropriately addressed in early childhood education, it may provide opportunities for educators to involve children in activities appropriate to their interests and experiences. The purpose of this research is to investigate comparatively the views of preschool teachers and preschool teacher candidates about STEM. To collect data, 60 preschool teachers graduated from different universities in Turkey have different experiments and actively in the teaching profession in various schools in the years 2018 to 2019, and 65 preschool teacher candidates in the first, second, third and fourth grades in the 2018-2019 academic year at a state university in the region of the Black Sea randomly selected. To collect data, preschool teachers and teacher candidates ask to answer the questions in the Screening Form consisting of open-ended questions aimed at obtaining in-depth information about STEM education. The findings analyze in detail, and it seen that the answers of both groups can discuss under three main themes; (1) The effects of the STEM approach, (2) The applicability of the STEM approach in preschool education, and (3) The requirements of the applicability of the STEM approach in Turkish educational system. According to the findings, participants have positive views about implementing the STEM approach in their classes for the teachers and future professional lives for the teacher candidates. However, there are some limitations about implementing it arising from the infrastructure of the schools, the teachers themselves, and children’s young age.
Full Text:
Download PDFReferences
Aldemir, J., & Kermani, H. (2017). Integrated STEM curriculum: Improving educational outcomes for head start children. Early Child Development and Care, 187(11), 1694-1706.
Akgündüz, D., & Akpınar, B. C. (2018). Okul öncesi eğitiminde fen eğitimi temelinde gerçekleştirilen STEM uygulamalarının öğrenci, öğretmen ve veli açısından değerlendirilmesi. Yaşadıkça Eğitim Dergisi, 32(1), 1-26.
Akgündüz, D., Aydeniz, M., Çakmakçı, G., Çavaş, B., Çorlu, M. S., Öner, T., & Özdemir, S. (2015). STEM eğitimi Türkiye raporu. İstanbul: Scala Basım.
Atiles, J. T., Jones, J. L., & Anderson, J. A. (2013). More than a read-aloud: Preparing and inspiring early childhood teachers to develop our future scientists. Teacher Education and Practice, 26(2), 285-300.
Balcı, A. (2011). Araştırma Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma (Gözden geçirilmiş ve geliştirilmiş 9. baskı). Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2015). Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: the teacher's experience. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(1), 112-128.
Barak, M., & Doppelt, Y. (2000). Using portfolios to enhance creative thinking. Journal of Technology Studies, 26(2), 16-25.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Geliştirilmiş 11. Baskı, s, 249.
Campbell, C., Speldewinde, C., Howitt, C., & MacDonald, A. (2018). STEM practice in the early years. Creative Education Journal Special Edition Preschool Education Research, 9(1), 11-25.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of school psychology, 44(6), 473-490.
Catherwood, D. (2000). New views on the young brain: offerings from developmental psychology to early childhood education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1(1), 23-35.
Chesloff, J. D. (2013). STEM education must start in early childhood. Education Week, 32(23), 27-32.
Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., & DiBiase, A. M. (2002). Preschool and Kindergarten Mathematics: a national conference. (Early Childhood Corner). Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(9), 510-515.
Cohen, L., and Manion, L. (1989). Research Methods in Education. 4th ed. New York: Routledge.
DeJarnette, N. (2012). America's children: Providing early exposure to STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) initiatives. Education, 133(1), 77-84.
DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P. W., & Reid, E. E. (2007). Kindergarten predictors of mathematical growth in the primary grades: An investigation using the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study--Kindergarten cohort. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 369.
Doppelt, Y. (2005). Assessment of project-based learning in a mechatronics context. Journal of Technology Education, 16(2), 7-24.
Doppelt, Y. (2009). Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(1), 55-65.
Doppelt, Y., & Barak, M. (2002). Pupils Identify Key Aspects and Outcomes of a Technological Learning Environment. Journal of Technology Studies, 28(1), 22-28.
Drew, C. J., Hardman, M. L., and Hart, A. W. (1996). Designing and Conducting Research: Inquiry in Education and Social Science. 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Ekiz, D. (2009). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (9. baskı) Scientific Research Methods (9th ed.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Ellis, A. K., & Fouts, J. T. (2001). Interdisciplinary curriculum: The research base.
Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok‐Naaman, R. (2004). Design‐based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081-1110.
Green, A. (2012). The integration of engineering design projects into the secondary science classroom. (Thesis). Michigan State University.
Hacıoğlu, Y. (2017). The effect of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education based activities on prospective science teachers' critical and creative thinking skills. (Dissertation)., Gazi University.
Hayes, N. (2007). Perspectives on the relationship between education and care in early childhood: A research paper. Dublin: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA). Accessed https://www.curriculumonline.ie/getmedia/f9fda0a5-bf83-4e76-9588-44ef32b6015e/ECSEC05_Exec1_Eng.pdf
Hayes, N. (2008). Teaching matters in early educational practice: The case for a nurturing pedagogy. Early Education and Development, 19(3), 430-440.
Hiğde, E. (2018). The Investigation of the effect of the STEM activities prepared for 7th class students in terms of different variables. (Dissertation), Adnan Menderes University.
Kang, J., Ju, E. J., & Jang, S. (2013). The Effect of Science-based STEAM Program using a Portfolio on Elementary Students' Formation of Science Concepts. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(4), 593-606.
Kong, Y. T., & In-Cheol, J. (2014). The effect of subject based STEAM activity programs on scientific attitude, self efficacy, and motivation for scientific learning. International Information Institute (Tokyo). Information, 17(8), 3629.
Lacey, T. A., & Wright, B. (2009). Employment outlook: 2008-18-occupational employment projections to 2018. Monthly Lab. Rev., 132, 82.
Liu, C. C., & Chen, I. J. (2010). Evolution of constructivism. Contemporary issues in education research, 3(4), 63-66.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. California: Sage Publications, Inc.
National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (2008). STEM education for student. Corporate Success, 20(3), 23.
Nell, M., Drew, W., & Bush, D. (2013). From play to practice: Connecting teachers’ play to children’s learning. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
Öcal, S. (2018). Examining the effects of early STEM educational program on the scientific process skills of preschool children between 60-66 months. Master diss. Yıldız Technical University.
Öner, A. T. (2017). STEM-FeTeMM okulları. STEM-fen, teknoloji, mühendislik, ve matematik eğitimi: Kuram ve uygulamaları (pp. xx-xx). İstanbul. Pusula: 27-36.
Ozkan, G., & Topsakal, U. U. (2017). Examining students’ opinions about STEAM activities. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(9), 115-123.
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 2(1), 4.
Sparkes, V. P. (2017). STEAM nedir. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Stone-MacDonald, A., Bartolini, V., Douglass, A., & Love, M. (2012). Focusing a new lens: STEM professional development for early education and care educators and programs. Accessed: https://www.communityinclusion.org/ecs/ecs/stem/FocusingNewLensFINALfullreport.pdf
Thompson, T. L., & Mintzes, J. J. (2002). Cognitive structure and the affective domain: on knowing and feeling in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 645-660.
Torres-Crespo, M. N., Kraatz, E., & Pallansch, L. (2014). From Fearing STEM to Playing with It: The Natural Integration of STEM into the Preschool Classroom. SRATE Journal, 23(2), 8-16.
Uğraş, M. (2017). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin STEM uygulamalarına yönelik görüşleri. Eğitimde Yeni Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 1(1), 39-54.
Uyanık Balat, G., & Günşen, G. (2017). STEM approach in pre-school period. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 5(42), 337-348.
Wang, H.H. (2012). A new era of science education: Science teachers’ perceptions and classroom practices of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) integration. (Dissertation). University of Minnesota.
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
Yildirim, B. (2016). An Analyses and Meta-Synthesis of Research on STEM Education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(34), 23-33.
Yılmaz, G. (2017). The affect of science experiments with family involvement to 5-6 age group of children’ science process skills and their attitudes to science. (Dissertation). Uludağ University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i2.20796
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Neslihan ÜLTAY, Eser Ultay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229 Bandung 40154, West Java, Indonesia