Cover Image

The Comparison of Student Creative Thinking Skill using CBL Implemented in STEM Education and Combined with PSL Worksheet in Indonesian School

Noviana Putri, Dadi Rusdiana, Irma Rahma Suwarma

Abstract


The main goal of this study is to present the effectiveness improvement of student’s creative thinking skills using CBL implemented in STEM education and CBL combined with worksheet PSL. The STEM education perspective used in this study is a separate science discipline (Physics) that incorporates other disciplines. The research method used in this study is a quantitative method with a quasi-experimental research design. The research includes a pre-test-post test control group design. The subjects of the research consist of forty-five students in 10th grade of one of the vocational schools. The instrument used in this study is an essay test consisting of four questions with indicators of fluency, flexibility, and originality. The enhancement of students’ creative thinking skills is known by analyzing normalized gain (<g>) on the experimental group and control group. A non-parametric test and Cohen’s Kappa test were used to examine differences improvement of student’s creative thinking skills with the IBM Statistics SPSS 20.00 program at .05 significant levels. As a result of the research, it was found that CBL implemented in STEM education has a higher improvement for students of creative thinking skills than CBL combined with worksheet PSL. CBL implemented in STEM education also has a major impact on improvement of students’ creative thinking skills.

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD PDF

References


Anwari, I., Yamada, S., Unno, M., Saito, T., Suwarma, I., Mutakinati, L., & Kumano, Y. (2015). Implementation of authentic learning and assessment through STEM education approach to improve students’ metacognitive skills. K-12 STEM Education, 1(3), 123-136.

Apriyani, R., Ramalis, T. R., & Suwarma, I. R. (2019). Analyzing Students' Problem Solving Abilities of Direct Current Electricity in STEM-Based Learning. Journal of Science Learning, 2(3), 85-91.

Ardiansyah, A. S., Junaedi, I., & Asikin, M. (2018). Student’s Creative Thinking Skill and Belief in Mathematics in Setting Challenge Based Learning Viewed by Adversity Quotient. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 7(1), 61-70.

Awang, H., & Ramly, I. (2008). Creative thinking skill approach through problem-based learning: Pedagogy and practice in the engineering classroom. International journal of human and social sciences, 3(1), 18-23.

Ayva, O. (2012). Developing Students’ Ability to Read, Understand and Analyze Scientific Data Through the Use of Worksheets that Focus on Studying Historical Documents. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5128-5132.

Bakırcı, H., Bilgin, A. K., & Simsek, A. (2011). The effects of simulation technique and worksheets on formal operational stage in science and technology lessons. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1462-1469.

Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students' learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 12.

Borchers, A., El-Sayed, T. L. C. J., & Hoff, C. (2012). Bringing environmental sustainability to undergraduate engineering education: Experiences in an inter-disciplinary course. Journal of STEM Education, 13(2), 22.

Celikler, D., & Aksan, Z. (2012). The effect of the use of worksheets about aqueous solution reactions on pre-service elementary science teachers’ academic success. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4611-4614.

Ceylan, S., & Ozdilek, Z. (2015). Improving a sample lesson plan for secondary science courses within the STEM education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 223-228.

Chasanah, L., Kaniawati, I., & Hernani, H. (2017). How to Assess Creative Thinking Skill in Making Products of Liquid Pressure?. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 895, No. 1, p. 012164). IOP Publishing.

Eldy, E. F., & Sulaiman, F. (2013). The role of PBL in improving physics students’ creative thinking and its imprint on gender. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(6), 1-10.

Furner, J. M., & Kumar, D. D. (2007). The mathematics and science integration argument: a stand for teacher education. Eurasia journal of mathematics, science & technology education, 3(3).

Hake, R. R. (2002). Relationship of individual student normalized learning gains in mechanics with gender, high-school physics, and pretest scores on mathematics and spatial visualization. In Physics education research conference (Vol. 8, pp. 1-14).

Hanif, S., Wijaya, A. F. C., & Winarno, N. (2019). Enhancing Students' Creativity through STEM Project-Based Learning. Journal of Science Learning, 2(2), 50-57.

Henriksen, D. (2014). Full STEAM ahead: Creativity in excellent STEM teaching practices. The STEAM journal, 1(2), 15.

Johnson, L., & Adams, S. (2011). Technology Outlook for UK Tertiary Education 2011-2016: An NMC horizon report regional analysis (pp. 1-22). The New Media Consortium.

Le, Q., Le, H., Vu, C., Nguyen, N., Nguyen, A., & Vu, N. (2015). Integrated science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education through active experience of designing technical toys in Vietnamese schools. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 11(2), 1-12.

Lee, C. D. (2014). Worksheet usage, reading achievement, classes' lack of readiness, and science achievement: A cross-country comparison. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 2(2), 95-106.

Lestari, T. P., Sarwi, S., & Sumarti, S. S. (2018). STEM-based Project Based Learning model to increase science process and creative thinking skills of 5th grade. Journal of Primary Education, 7(1), 18-24.

Luthfiana, A., Ambarita, A., & Suwarjo, S. (2018). Developing Worksheet Based on Multiple Intelligences to Optimize the Creative Thinking Students. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 7(1), 1-12.

Nichols, M., Cator, K., & Torres, M. (2016). Challenge Based Learner User Guide. Redwood City, CA: Digital Promise, 24-36.

Nufus, H., Duskri, M., & Bahrun, B. (2018). Mathematical Creative Thinking and Student Self-Confidence in the Challenge-Based Learning Approach. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 3(2), 57-68.

Nurisalfah, R., Fadiawati, N., & Jalmo, T. (2018). Enhancement of students’ creative thinking skills on mixture separation topic using project based student worksheet. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1013, No. 1, p. 012085). IOP Publishing.

Nyamupangedengu, E., & Lelliott, A. (2012). An exploration of learners' use of worksheets during a science museum visit. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), 82-99.

Osman, K., Hiong, L. C., & Vebrianto, R. (2013). 21st century biology: an interdisciplinary approach of biology, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 188-194.

Pratt, H. (2013). Conceptual shifts in the next generation science standards: Opportunities and challenges. Science Scope, 37(1), 6.

Roberts, A. (2012). A justification for STEM education. Technology and engineering teacher, 71(8), 1-4.

Sanders, M. (2009). Integrative STEM education: primer. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.

Saraç, H. (2018). The Effect of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics-STEM Educational Practices on Students' Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis Study. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(2), 125-142.

Sharma, R.M. (2014). Teaching Integrated Science through the use of Interactive Worksheet. Carribean Curricullum, 4, (1), 85-103.

Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., Selby, E. C., & Shepardson, C. (2002). Assessing creativity: A guide for education. Sarasota, FL: The National Research Center on the gifted and talented.

Ugras, M. (2018). The Effects of STEM Activities on STEM Attitudes, Scientific Creativity and Motivation Beliefs of the Students and Their Views on STEM Education. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(5).

Ulaş, A. H., Sevim, O., & Tan, E. (2012). The effect of worksheets based upon 5e learning cycle model on student success in teaching of adjectives as grammatical components. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 391-398.

Williams, B. L. (1941). The Worksheet in the History Classroom. The Social Studies, 32(1), 22-23.

Yang, Z., Zhou, Y., Chung, J. W., Tang, Q., Jiang, L., & Wong, T. K. (2018). Challenge Based Learning nurtures creative thinking: An evaluative study. Nurse education today, 71, 40-47.

Yasin, A. I., Prima, E. C., & Sholihin, H. (2018). Learning Electricity using Arduino-Android based Game to Improve STEM Literacy. Journal of Science Learning, 1(3), 77-94.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i1.17557

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2019 Noviana Putri, Dadi Rusdiana, Irma Rahma Suwarma

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Science Learning is published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
in collaboration with the Indonesian Society of Science Educators
Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229 Bandung 40154, West Java, Indonesia
Website: http://www.upi.edu
Email: jslearning@upi.edu
View My Stats