Comparison of University Students' Graphic Interpretation Skills
Abstract
Graphic interpretation is as critical in physics education as problem-solving. However, we know that today's classes focus more on problem-solving. This study uses a survey to determine college students' graphic interpretation skills. The study consists of two phases. The first phase includes the development and statistical analysis of the survey. The second phase includes comparing and discussing the data resulting from the application of the developed survey. The research data were analyzed using both exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis techniques. The survey on graphic interpretation skills, including the understanding and analysis processes, consisted of 17 items based on analysis results. The survey data were collected using purposive sampling from 113 college volunteers during the fall semester of 2022-2023 at Dokuz Eylul University in Turkey. The participants consisted of 57 geoscience students and 56 mining students. The survey results showed that the kinematic interpretation skills of mining engineering students were higher than those of geoscience students. These differences between geoscience and mining engineering students in cognitive, affective, and psychomotor behaviors were discussed.
Full Text:
Download PDFReferences
Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education, 33(2-3), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1315(99) 00029-9
Amin, B. D., Shib, E. P., Harianto, Y. I., Patandeani A. J., Herman, & Sujiono, E. H. (2020). The interpreting ability on science kinematics graphs of senior high school students in south Sulawesi, Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 179-186. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23349
Beichner, R. J. (1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American Journal of Physics, 62, 750-762. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17449
Bektasli, B., & White, A. L. (2012). The relationships between logical thinking, gender, and kinematics graph interpretation skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 48, 1-20.
Bollen, L., Van Kampen, P., Baily, C., Kelly, M., & De Cock, M. (2017). Student difficulties regarding symbolic and graphical representations of vector fields. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev PhysEducRes.13.020109
Bursal, M., & Yetis, S. (2020). Middle school students’ graph skills and affective states about graphs. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 6(4), 692-704. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i4.1136
Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Celik, H., & Pektas, H. M. (2017). Graphic comprehension and interpretation skills of pre-service teachers with different learning approaches in a technology-aided learning environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9667-9
De Cock, M. (2012). Representation use and strategy choice in physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 8(020117), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020117
Ergul, N. R. (2018). Pre-service science teachers’ construction and interpretation of graphs. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 139-144. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060113
Gok, T., & Gok, T. (2022). High school students' comprehension of kinematics graphs with peer instruction approach. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 18(2), 144-155.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Haratua, T. M. S., & Sirait, J. (2016). Representations based physics instruction to enhance students’ problem solving. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-4-1-1
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
Ivanjek, L., Susac, A., Planinic, M., & Andrasevic, A. (2016). Student reasoning about graphs in different contexts. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(010106), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010106
Karagoz, Y. (2016). SPSS and AMOS 23 applied statistical analysis. Ankara: Nobel Academic Publishing.
Klein, P., Viiri, J., Mozaffari, S., Dengel, A., & Kuhn, J. (2018). Instruction-based clinical eye-tracking study on the visual interpretation of divergence: How do students look at vector field plots?. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 10116. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010116
Kohnle, A., & Passante, G. (2017). Characterizing representational learning: A combined simulation and tutorial on perturbation theory. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020131. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020131
Korff, V. J., & Rebello, N. S. (2012). Teaching integration with layers and representations: A case study. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 8(1), 010125. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevSTPER.8.010125
Kosslyn, S. M. (1985). Graphing and human information processing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80(391), 499-512. https://doi.org/10.2307/2288463
Kuo, E., Hull, M. M., Gupta, A., & Elby, A. (2013). How students blend conceptual and formal mathematical reasoning in solving physics problems. Science Education, 97(1), 32-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21043
Lienhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Function, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Education Research, 60(1), 1-64.
Magana, A. J., Serrano, M. I., & Rebello, N. S. (2019). A sequenced multimodal learning approach to support students’ development of conceptual learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12356
Manurung, S. R., Mihardi, S., Rustaman, N. Y., & Siregar, N. (2018). Improvement of graph interpretation ability using hypertext-assisted kinematic learning and formal thinking ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 14(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v14i1.9444
Maries, A., Lin, S. Y., & Singh, C. (2017). Challenges in designing appropriate scaffolding to improve students’ representational consistency: The case of a Gauss’s law problem. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020103. https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020103
Maries, A., & Singh, C. (2013). Exploring one aspect of pedagogical content knowledge of teaching assistants using the test of understanding graphs in kinematics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 9(020120), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020120
Maries, A., & Singh, C. (2018). Case of two electrostatics problems: Can providing a diagram adversely impact introductory physics students’ problem solving performance?. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 10114. https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010114
McDermott, L. C., Rosenquist, M. L., & van Zee, E. H. (1987). Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics. American Journal of Physics, 55(6), 503-513. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15104
McPadden, D., & Brewe, E. (2017). Impact of the second semester University Modeling Instruction course on students’ representation choices. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020129. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020129
Meltzer, D. E. (2005). Relation between students’ problem-solving performance and representational format. American Journal of Physics, 73(5), 463-478. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1862636
Munfaridah, N., Avraamidou, L., & Goedhart, M. (2021). The use of multiple representations in undergraduate physics education: What do we know and where do we go from here?. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9577
Nixon, R. S., Godfrey, T. J., Mayhew, N. T., & Wiegert, C. C. (2016). Undergraduate student construction and interpretation of graphs in physics lab activities. Physical Review Physics Education Review, 12(010104), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010104
Petrova, H. G. (2016). Developing students’ graphic skills in physics education at secondary school. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 6(5), 123-126. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-060501123126
Planinic, M., Ivanjek, L., & Susac, A. (2013). Comparison of university students' understanding of graphs in different contexts. Physical Review Special Topics- Physics Education Research, 9(020103), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.020103
Podolefsky, N. S., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2006). Use of analogy in learning physics: The role of representations. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 2(2), 020101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.020101
Rosengrant, D., Van Heuvelen, A., & Etkina, E. (2009). Do students use and understand free-body diagrams?. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 5(1), 010108. https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.010108
Savinainen, A., Nieminen, P., Makynen, A., & Viiri, J. (2013). Teaching and evaluation materials utilizing multiple representations in mechanics. Physics Education, 48(3), 372-377. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/48/3/372
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation model: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
Sengel, E., & Ozden, M. Y. (2010). The effects of computer simulated experiments on high school students’ understanding of the displacement and velocity concepts. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 39, 191-211.
Susac, A., Bubic, A., Martinjak, P., Planinic, M., & Palmovic, M. (2017). Graphical representations of data improve student understanding of measurement and uncertainty: An eye-tracking study. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020125. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev PhysEducRes.13.020125
Susac, A., Bubic, A., Planinic, M., Movre, M., & Palmovic, M. (2019). Role of diagrams in problem solving: An evaluation of eye-tracking parameters as a measure of visual attention. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 13101. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.013101
Sutopo, & Waldrip, B. (2014). Impact of A Representational Approach on Students’ Reasoning and Ceonceptual Understanding in Learning Mechanics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 741-765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9431-y
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.) New York: NY:Pearson Education Inc.
Theasy, Y., Wiyanto, & Sujarwata (2018) Multi-representation ability of students on problem solving representation. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 986, 21-24.
Vaara, R. L., & Sasaki, D. G. G. (2019). Teaching kinematics graphs in an undergraduate course using an active methodology mediated by video analysis. LUMAT: International Journal on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.7.1.374
Wong, D., Poo, S. P., Hock, N. E., & Kang, W. L. (2011). Learning with multiple representations: An example of a revision lesson in mechanics. Physics Education, 46(2), 178-186. DOI:10.1088/0031-9120/46/2/005
Zavala, G., Tejeda, S., Barniol, P., & Beichner, R. J. (2017). Modifying the test of understanding graphs in kinematics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020111
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v6i3.55419
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Tolga Gök
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi 229 Bandung 40154, West Java, Indonesia