1.png)
Email this article The Basic Movement Skill Test Instrument of Ball Games for Students Aged 13-15 Years
Abstract
This study was basically aimed at meeting the needs of physical Education teachers in conducting the assessment process of the psychomotor aspects, thus this research focused on testing the validity of a basic movement skill test instrument in ball games specifically for students aged 13-15 years. Quantitative descriptive method was used in this study and carried out on 25 junior high school students grade VII in Cimahi city. The instrument developed was the basic movement skill test instrument of the ball game consisting of skill for passing, service up, service down, chest passing, bounding passing (boundpass), overhead passing, overhead dribbling, inner leg passing, outer foot passing, dorsal passing, and dribbling. The validity method used was related validity criteria by using composite scores. The trial results obtained from students were analysed by using the Pearson product moment technique. The results of the validity analysis showed that the value of the validity coefficient criteria was ranging from rxy = 0.84 to 0.96 for the basic movement skill instrument of volleyball, rxy = 0.95 to 0.97 for the basic movement skill of the soccer game, and rxy = 0, 93 – 0.97 for the basic movement skill instrument of basketball games. Therefore, the study concludes that the basic movement skill instrument of ball games can be used to assess the ability of basic movement skills of junior high school students.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini pada dasarnya bertujuan untuk memenuhi kebutuhan guru PJOK dalam melakukan proses penilaian pada aspek psikomotor maka dari itu penelitian ini berfokus pada pengujian validitas sebuah instrument tes keterampilan gerak dasar pada permainan bola besar khusus untuk siswa dengan rentang usia 13-15 tahun. Metode deskriprif kuantitatif yang digunakan pada penelitian ini dan dilakukan pada siswa sekolah menengah pertama kelas VII di kota cimahi sebanyak 25 orang. Instrument yang dikembangkan yaitu instrument tes keterampilan gerak dasar permainan bola besar terdiri dari keterampilan gerak passing atas, passing bawah, service atas, service bawah, passing dada, passing pantul, passing atas kepala, menggiring bola, passing kaki bagian dalam, passing kaki bagian luar, passing bagian punggung kaki, dan menggiring bola. Adapun tahapan yang dilakukan yaitu dengan menguji validitas dengan analisis person Product Moment menggunakan composite score dan menguji reliabilitas dengan menggunakan uji tes tes retest. Skor hasil uji coba yang diperoleh dari siswa dikorelasikan dengan menggunakan teknik pearson product moment. Hasil analisis validitas diperoleh nilai koefisien validitas kriteria terentang antara rxy = 0,84 – 0,96 untuk instrument keterampilan gerak dasar permainan bola voli, rxy = 0,95 – 0,97 untuk instrument keterampilan gerak dasar permainan sepak bola dan rxy = 0,93 – 0,97 untuk instrument keterampilan gerak dasar permainan bola basket. Maka dari itu kesimpulan dari penelitian ini yaitu instrument keterampilan gerak dasar permainan bola dapat dipergunakan untuk menilai kemampuan keterampilan gerak dasar siswa sekolah menengah pertama.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allen, K., & Dixon, M. (1994). Psychometric assessment of the al/len barriers to treatment instrument. Substance Use and Misuse, 29(5), 545–563. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826089409047399
Arias-Estero, J., & Castejón, F. (2014). Using instruments for tactical assessment in physical education and extra-curricular sports. European Physical Education Review, 20(4), 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X14539214
Bailey, R., Armour, K., Kirk, D., Jess, M., Pickup, I., & Sandford, R. (2009). The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: An academic review. Research Papers in Education, 24(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701809817
Baldwin, C. F. (2015). First-year physical education teachers’ experiences with teaching African refugee students. SAGE Open, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015569737
Beery, T. H. (2013). Establishing reliability and construct validity for an instrument to measure environmental connectedness. Environmental Education Research, 19(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.687045
Bejerholm, U., & Eklund, M. (2006). Construct validity of a newly developed instrument: Profile of Occupational Engagement in people with Schizophrenia, POES. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 60(3), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039480600636239
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. In International Journal of Phytoremediation (Vol. 21). https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Boddington, B. J., Cripps, A. J., Scanlan, A. T., Spiteri, T., Boddington, B. J., Cripps, A. J., … Spiteri, T. (2019). The validity and reliability of the Basketball Jump Shooting Accuracy Test The validity and reliability of the Basketball Jump Shooting Accuracy Test. Journal of Sports Sciences, 0(0), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1582138
Erward G Carmines. (n.d.). CAE Fall 2019 Reliability and validity assessment.pdf.
Inan, M. (2010). A Study on the Trainee Teachers’ Self Assessment in Physical Education Teaching Skills and its Effect on their Academic Achievement. Gifted Education International, 26(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142941002600106
Kalaja, S., Jaakkola, T., Liukkonen, J., & Watt, A. (2010). Fundamental movement skills and motivational factors influencing engagement in physical activity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 111(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.2466/06.10.25.PMS.111.4.115-128
Leirhaug, P. E., & MacPhail, A. (2015). ‘It’s the other assessment that is the key’: three Norwegian physical education teachers’ engagement (or not) with assessment for learning. Sport, Education and Society, 20(5), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2014.975113
López-Pastor, V. M., Kirk, D., Lorente-Catalán, E., MacPhail, A., & Macdonald, D. (2013). Alternative assessment in physical education: A review of international literature. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2012.713860
McKenzie, T. L., & McKenzie, T. L. (2007). The preparation of physical educators: A public health perspective. Quest, 59(4), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2007.10483557
Mohamad Asri, M. N., Hashim, N. H., Mat Desa, W. N. S., & Ismail, D. (2018). Pearson Product Moment Correlation (PPMC) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for objective comparison and source determination of unbranded black ballpoint pen inks/. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 50(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2016.1236292
Hay. Peter J (2006). Assessment for Learning in Physical Education.
Quite, A., Onofre, M., Gerlach, E., Scheur, C., & Herrmann, C. (2018). MOBAK 1 Assessment in Primary Physical Education : Exploring Basic Motor Competences of Portuguese 6-Year-Olds. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512518804358
Reiff, M. I. (2001). Psychosocial correlates of physical activity in healthy children. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 22(6), 451. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004703-200112000-00030
Tolgfors, B., & Öhman, M. (2015). The Implications of Assessment for Learning in Physical Education and Health. European Physical Education Review, 22(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X15595006
Tri, I., Ronald, H., & Ray, D. (2018). Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani dan Olahraga. Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga, 3(1), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpjo.v3i1.10461
UU No 3 Tahun 2005. (2005). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2005 Tentang Sistem Keolahragaan Nasional Dengan. Presiden RI, (1), 1–53.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jpjo.v5i1.21447
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Silvy Juditya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.