Implementing Rasch Model as an Approach to Test Academic Integrity Instrument's Validity and Reliability

Dira Devayanti, Dodi Suryana, Yaya Sunarya

Abstract


This research was conducted to analyze the validity of the academic integrity instrument for senior high school (SMA) students in Bandung. The academic integrity instrument consists of 45 items which contain five aspects of academic integrity: honesty, trust, fairness, respect and responsibility. The research sample was 80 high school students randomly distributed in 3 classes in Bandung. This study used a quantitative approach and descriptive method with a survey as the research method design. Data were analyzed with the Rasch model using the Winstep application version 3.73. The results of the analysis found that: 1) The interaction between respondents and items is included in the good category; 2) The reliability value of the respondent which shows the consistency of the respondent in filling out the instrument is included in the good and acceptable category; 3) The reliability of the item items as an indicator of the quality of the item items in the instrument belongs to the special category; 4) The average difficulty level of standard items is above the ability level of high school students. Thus the items of the academic integrity instrument are easily approved by high school students in Bandung.


Keywords


Academic Integrity, Instrument, Item Reliability, Rasch Model

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adi, N. R. M., Amaruddin, H., Adi, H. M. M., & A'yun, I. L. Q. (2022). Validity and reliability analysis using the rasch model to measure the quality of mathematics test items of vocational high schools. Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation, 11(2), 103-113.

Ardiyanti, D. (2016). Aplikasi model Rasch pada pengembangan skala efikasi diri dalam pengambilan keputusan karir siswa. Jurnal Psikologi, 43(3), 248-263.

Asdar, A. K., & Afriadi, B. (2022). Standardisasi instrumen integritas akademik melalui pendekatan Confirmatory Factor Analysis dan Rasch model. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 13(2), 88-108.

Bariyah, S. K. (2021). Hubungan Pembiasaan Budaya Islami Dan Kedisiplinan Beribadah Dengan Kepribadian Siswa Kelas 6 Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Negeri 1 Banyumas (Doctoral dissertation, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Purwokerto (Indonesia).

Bashir, H., & Bala, R. (2018). Development and validation of academic dishonesty scale (ADS): Presenting a multidimensional scale. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 57-74.

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Routledge.

Carvalho, L. D. F., Primi, R., & Meyer, G. J. (2012). Application of the Rasch model in measuring personality disorders. Trends, 34(2), 101–109.

Chowdhury, M. (2018). Emphasizing morals, values, ethics, and character education in science education and science teaching. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 1-16.

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological assessment, 31(12), 1-50.

Erfan, M., Maulyda, M. A., Ermiana, I., Hidayati, V. R., & Widodo, A. (2020). Validity and reliability of cognitive tests study and development of elementary curriculum using Rasch model. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 3(1), 26-33.

Faucher, D., & Caves, S. (2009). Academic dishonesty: Innovative cheating techniques and the detection and prevention of them. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 4(2), 37-41.

Firmantyo, T., & Alsa, A. (2016). Integritas akademik dan kecemasan akademik dalam menghadapi ujian nasional pada siswa. Psikohumaniora: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 1(1), 1-11.

Fitria, Y. (2019). Perilaku menyontek: Persepsi terhadap iklim sekolah dengan ketidakjujuran akademik. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, 7(1), 1-12.

Fluerentin, E. (2012). Latihan Kesadaran Diri (self awareness) dan kaitannya dengan penumbuhan karakter. Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan, 1(1), 9-18.

George, E. J. (2013). Invanriant Measuremnt: Using Rasch Models in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences. Routledge.

Gill, J. (2013). Global corruption report: Education. Routledge.

Hafizha, R. (2021). Pentingnya integritas akademik. Journal of Education and Counseling (JECO), 1(2), 115-124.

Hagquist, C., & Andrich, D. (2017). Recent advances in analysis of differential item functioning in health research using the Rasch model. Health and quality of life outcomes, 15(1), 1-8.

Jusoh, M. S., Din, M. H., & Suriani, T. (2018). Construct validity for measuring entrepreneurial readiness among Malaysian higher education students: A Stochastic Measurement Model Approach. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 150, p. 06044). EDP Sciences.

Kristanto, S. B., Angeline, A., & Subagyo, S. (2020). Survei kecurangan akademik pada mahasiswa program studi akuntansi. Perspektif Akuntansi, 3(3), 179-196.

Ma’ruf, S., & Saputera, A. R. A. (2019). Analisis pengembangan budaya akademik dan problematikanya di Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo. KABILAH: Journal of Social Community, 4(2), 16-33.

McCabe, D. L. (2005). Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 1(1), 1-11.

Medvedev, O. N., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2022). Rasch measurement model. In Handbook of assessment in mindfulness research (pp. 1-18). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two criteria for good measurements in research: Validity and reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University, 17(3), 1–32.

Park, E. J., Park, S., & Jang, I. S. (2013). Academic cheating among nursing students. Nurse education today, 33(4), 346-352.

Planinic, M., Boone, W. J., Susac, A., & Ivanjek, L. (2019). Rasch analysis in physics education research: Why measurement matters. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 1-14.

Ramdani, Z. (2018). Construction of academic integrity scale. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 7(1), 87-97.

Rofi'ie, A. H. (2019). Pendidikan karakter adalah sebuah keharusan. WASKITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai dan Pembangunan Karakter, 1(1), 113-128.

Rohmanu, A. (2016). Tata kelola mahasiswa terhadap integritas akademik dan plagiarisme. Muslim Heritage, 1(2), 331-352.

Saidi, S. S., & Siew, N. M. (2019). Reliability and validity analysis of statistical reasoning test survey instrument using the rasch measurement model. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 535-546.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi model Rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial (edisi revisi). Trim Komunikata Publishing House.

Tambak, S. (2017). Metode cooperative learning dalam pembelajaran pendidikan agama Islam. Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Agama Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan, 14(1), 1-17.

Tauginienė, L., Gaižauskaitė, I., Glendinning, I., Kravjar, J., Ojsteršek, M., Ribeiro, L., ... & Foltýnek, T. (2018). Glossary for academic integrity. ENAI Report 3G [online]: revised version, October 2018.

Van Zile-Tamsen, C. (2017). Using Rasch analysis to inform rating scale development. Research in Higher Education, 58(8), 922-933.

Wibisono, S. (2016). Aplikasi model Rasch untuk validasi instrumen pengukuran fundamentalisme agama bagi responden muslim. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(1), 1-29.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/pdgia.v21i1.54133

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


INDEXED BY

 width=

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Web
Analytics