Heutagogy Approach in Merdeka Curriculum

Rusdiono Muryanto

doi:10.17509/pdgia.v20i2.50771

Heutagogy Approach in Merdeka Curriculum

Rusdiono Muryanto

Abstract

The Covid-19 crisis in the world has significantly impacted everything, including the world of education. Almost all countries have closed the face-to-face teaching and learning process in schools at all levels of education. Many countries then improve their education system so students can catch up in learning. In Indonesia, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology is also trying to restore education by issuing the ‘Kurikulum Merdeka policy. This study examines the appropriate learning approach in implementing the ‘Kurikulum Merdeka’ in primary and secondary education units. A heutagogical approach is an approach in education where learners are fully centered and determined to learn. Students can be active and proactive and create fun learning for themselves. Based on the studies carried out, with a heutagogical approach and the use of technology, students will be able to master the competencies that have been determined through fun learning, and this can be applied in the Implementation of the ‘Kurikulum Merdeka’ which focuses on the needs of students.

Keywords

Kurikulum Merdeka, Technology, Heutagogy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ardinata, R. P., Rahmat, H. K., Andres, F. S., & Waryono, W. (2022). Kepemimpinan transformasional sebagai solusi pengembangan konsep smart city menuju era society 5.0: sebuah kajian literatur [Transformational leadership as a solution for the development of the smart city concept in the society era: a literature review]. Al-Ihtiram: Multidisciplinary Journal of Counseling and Social Research, 1(1), 33-44.

Astutik, A. P., & Jannah, M. (2021, February). The Website-based Information Literacy system and Application in Education Facing the Age of Industrial Revolution 4.0”. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1779, No. 1, p. 012055). IOP Publishing.

Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 56-71.

Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2019). Heutagogy and digital media networks. Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 1-14.

Brooks, R. (2021). The construction of higher education students within national policy: A cross-European comparison. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 51(2), 161-180.

Canning, N., & Callan, S. (2010). Heutagogy: Spirals of reflection to empower learners in higher education. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 71-82.

Danial, E. & Wasriah, W. (2009). Metode penulisan karya ilmiah. Bandung: Laboratorium Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan.

Edutech, (08 June 2020). Pedagogy, Andragogy, dan Heutagogy. Sokrates. https://sokrates.id/2020/06/08/pedagogy-andragogy-dan-heutagogy/

Elliott B., (2008) E-pedagogy and e-assessment. IN: F. Khandia (ed.). 12th CAA International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference: Proceedings of the Conference on 8th and 9th July 2008 at Loughborough University. Loughborough: Lougborough University, 107-122.

Evelina, L. W., & Safitri, Y. (2022). Emotional Bonding in Coffee Shops Toward Society 5.0. Avant Garde, 10(2), 233-243.

Fukuyama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society. Japan Spotlight, 27(5), 47-50.

Hanafy, M., & Ming, R. (2021). Machine learning approaches for auto insurance big data. Risks, 9(2), 42-56.

Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (Eds.). (2013). Self-determined learning: Heutagogy in action. A&C Black. Hiryanto, H. (2017). Pedagogi, Andragogi dan Heutagogi Serta implikasinya dalam pemberdayaan masyarakat. Dinamika Pendidikan, 22(1), 65-71.

Hotimah, U., & Raihan, S. (2020). Pendekatan heutagogi dalam pembelajaran di era society 5.0. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(2), 152-159.

Istiarsono, Z. (2018). Manajemen pembinaan kompetensi kepribadian dan kinerja guru. INTELEGENSIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3(1), 61-73.

Johan, R. C., Sutisna, M. R., Rullyana, G., & Ardiansah, A. (2020). Developing online learning communities. In Borderless Education as a Challenge in the 5.0 Society (pp. 145-153). CRC Press.

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi, (2021). Paparan kebijakan kurikulum merdeka. Jakarta: Kemdikbudristek.

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi. (2022). Kajian akademik Kurikulum untuk Pemulihan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: BSAKP, Kemdikbudristek.

Lase, D. (2019). Education and industrial revolution 4.0. Jurnal Handayani Pgsd Fip Unimed, 10(1), 48-62.

Mohammad, S., Siang, T., Osman, S., Jamaluddin, N., Alfu, N. M., & Huei, L. (2019). A proposed heutagogy framework for structural steel design in civil engineering curriculum.

International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(24), 96-105.

Narayan, V., & Herrington, J. (2014). Towards a theoretical mobile heutagogy framework. SCILITE 2014: Rhetoric and Reality, 150–160.

Nastiti, F. E., & Ni’mal‘Abdu, A. R. (2020). Kesiapan pendidikan Indonesia menghadapi era society 5.0. Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 5(1), 61-66.

Nusantara, T. (2020). Nusantara, T. (2020). Society 5.0 dan riset perguruan tinggi indonesia. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penguatan Riset Dan Luarannya Sebagai Budaya Akademik Di Perguruan Tinggi Memasuki Era (Vol. 5, No. 1, p. 1).

Oke, A., & Fernandes, F. A. P. (2020). Innovations in teaching and learning: Exploring the perceptions of the education sector on the 4th industrial revolution (4IR). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 1-22.

Pribadi, B. A. (2009). Desain sistem pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Dian Rakyat.

Roztocki, N., Soja, P., & Weistroffer, H. R. (2019). The role of information and communication technologies in socioeconomic development: towards a multi-dimensional framework. Information Technology for Development, 25(2), 171-183.

Rullyana, G., Hanoum, N., & Dewi, L. (2017, November). Students’ Perception of Pedagogical Course Learning Process - Developing Pedagogical Competence in Teacher Education. In International Conference on Educational Sciences (ICES). (Vol. 1, pp. 277-282). SCITEPRESS.

UNESCO, (2004). Changing Teacher Practices, Using Curriculum Differentiation to Respond to Students’ Diversity. UNESCO, France.

Usmaedi, U. (2021). Education curriculum for society 5.0 in the next decade. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Setiabudhi, 4(2), 63-79.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/pdgia.v20i2.50771