Students’ Self-Regulated Learning on Division Algorithm with a Fair-Share Method

Efa Murdiyati, Tatang Herman

Abstract


Learning environments should be where constructive and self-regulated learning is fostered. Teachers should transform their mathematics classes into something more challenging and fun while building students’ numeracy skills and learning character. Self-regulated learning is a learning character that students must have to become agentic life-long learners in an unpredictable, dynamic, and ever-changing society. This study aimed to describe students’ self-regulated learning on the division algorithm with a fair-share method. This was descriptive qualitative research using the case study method conducted in six weeks. The subjects of this study are ten students in grade four. The data sources were collected from self-regulated learning scales and students’ learning activity observation sheets. The data was analyzed through data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. This study unveiled that a teaching division algorithm with a fair-share method could nourish students’ self-regulated learning. Proven that only 20% of students had moderate levels of self-regulated learning; 50% of students had high levels of self-regulated learning; and 30% of students had very high levels of self-regulated learning. Furthermore, the average score of self-regulated dimensions was classified as very good. The fair-share method also impacted students’ behavior to be excited in learning and exposing them to mathematical modeling through the dividing candies activity.

Keywords


A Fair-Share; Division Algorithm; Method; Self-Regulated Learning; Students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ansel, M. F. (2020). The Relationship between Achievement Motivation and Learning Independence of Students at SDN 5 Ende, Ende Regency. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v6i1.1859

Atmojo, I. R. W., Ardiansyah, R., Adi, F. P., Chumdari, C., Saputri, D. Y., & Wahyuningtyas, M. (2023). The Relationship between Self-Regulated Learning and Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 10(3), 513–526. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v10i3.61151

Aydın, E., & Dinçer, Ç. (2022). “I did it wrong, but i know it”: Young children’s metacognitive knowledge expressions during peer interactions in math activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101104

Azwar, S. (2015). The Making of Psychological Scales. Pustaka Pelajar.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall. https://archive.org/details/BanduraSocialLearningTheory/page/n3/mode/1up

Boekaerts, M., & Niemivirta, M. (2000). Chapter 13 - Self-Regulated Learning: Finding a Balance between Learning Goals and Ego-Protective Goals. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 417–450). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50042-1

Boeree, C. (2006). Jean Piaget. Personality Theories. In Personality Theories. http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/Piaget.pdf

Boerner, S., Seeber, G., Keller, H., & Beinborn, P. (2005). Lernstrategien und Lernerfolg im Studium: Zeitschrift Für Entwicklungspsychologie Und Pädagogische Psychologie, 37(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637.37.1.17

Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2023). Assessment and mathematical literacy: a brief introduction. In International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition) (pp. 220–233). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09007-2

Çakmak Gürel, Z. (2023). Teaching mathematical modeling in the classroom: Analyzing the scaffolding methods of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104253

Cleary, T. J., Slemp, J., & Pawlo, E. R. (2021). Linking student self‐regulated learning profiles to achievement and engagement in mathematics. Psychology in the Schools, 58(3), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22456

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE. http://www.ceil-conicet.gov.ar/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Creswell-Cap-10.pdf

Dewayani, S., Retnaningdyah, P., Susanto, D., Ikhwanudin, T., Fianto, F., Muldian, W., Syukur, Y., Setiakarnawijaya, Y., & Antoro, B. (2021). Guidelines for Strengthening Literacy and Numeracy in Schools (S. Handini, Ed.; I). Directorate General of Early Childhood Education, Basic Education and Secondary Education, Ministry of Education and Culture. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/22599/1/Panduan_Penguatan_Literasi_dan_Numerasi_di_Sekolah_bf1426239f.pdf

Groff, J. (2012). The Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice (H. Dumont, D. Istance, & F. Benavides, Eds.). OECD Publications. https://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/50300814.pdf

Hidayati, R. M., & Wagiran, W. (2020). Implementation of problem-based learning to improve problem-solving skills in vocational high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v10i2.31210

Hillier, Y. (2007). ‘Real World’ Interactions for Adult Basic Numeracy Tutors. Mathematical Modelling, 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857099419.4.203

Huitt, W., & Hummel, J. (2003). Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development. Educational Psychology Interactive, Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cognition/piaget.html

Husna, F. (2021). The Influence of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Learning Models on the Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability and Learning Independence of Students at SMP Negeri 7 Tanjungbalai [Universitas Muhamadiyah Sumatera Utara]. http://repository.umsu.ac.id/handle/123456789/15506

Khomaria, I., & Robandi, B. (2023). Mathematics Learning Division Material Using Bar Diagrams and Leftover Game Board. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 13(3), 263–270. https://ejournal.uksw.edu/scholaria/article/view/9256

Kusmarni, Y. (2012). Case Study. Universitas Pendidikan Indoenesia. http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPIPS/JUR._PEND._SEJARAH/196601131990012-YANI_KUSMARNI/Laporan_Studi_Kasus.pdf

Lahdenperä, J., Rämö, J., & Postareff, L. (2022). Student-centred learning environments supporting undergraduate mathematics students to apply regulated learning: A mixed-methods approach. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, 100949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100949

Lee, M., Lee, S. Y., Kim, J. E., & Lee, H. J. (2023). Domain-specific self-regulated learning interventions for elementary school students. Learning and Instruction, 88, 101810. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101810

Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J. L. (2006). OECD’s Brief Self-Report Measure of Educational Psychology’s Most Useful Affective Constructs: Cross-Cultural, Psychometric Comparisons Across 25 Countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311–360. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0604_1

Martínez-López, Z., Nouws, S., Villar, E., Mayo, M. E., & Tinajero, C. (2023). Perceived social support and self-regulated learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100291. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJEDRO.2023.100291

Merawan, C. T., Hajidin, & Duskri, M. (2021). Self-regulated learning through Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 012087. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012087

Nainggolan, Y. H. (2023). The Relationship Between Interest in Learning and Learning Activeness in Students at Bandung Private High School Percut Sei Tuan [Universitas Medan Area]. https://repositori.uma.ac.id/handle/123456789/19693

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document

OECD. (2018). The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf

Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x

Powell, S. R., Berry, K. A., & Benz, S. A. (2020). Analyzing the word-problem performance and strategies of students experiencing mathematics difficulty. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58, 100759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100759

Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32(4), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3204_1

Shreve, G. M. (2006). The deliberate practice: Translation and expertise. Journal of Translation Studies, 9(1), 27–42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266328429_The_Deliberate_Practice_Translation_and_Expertise

Sugiyono. (2015). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. IKAPI.

Suhandi, A., & Kurniasri, D. (2019). Improving Student Independence Through Contextual Learning Models in Class IV Elementary Schools. Jurnal Gentala Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.22437/gentala.v4i1.6972

Teng, (Mark) Feng. (2020). Young learners’ reading and writing performance: Exploring collaborative modeling of text structure as an additional component of self-regulated strategy development. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100870

Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-William, J. M. (2015). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. (Ninth). Pearson Education.

Wen, J., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., & Cai, Y. (2023). Development and validation of the Self-Regulated Translation Learning Strategy Scale (SRTLSS). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 78, 101292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101292

Widiana, I. W., Tegeh, I. M., Lanang Agung Parwata, I. G., & . H. . (2020). Improving Student’s Factual Knowledge with Concrete Media through Observing Activities in Scientific Approaches in Elementary Schools. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.73.293.299

Winne. (2018). A cognitive and metacognitive analysis of self-regulated learning (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-3

Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, 277–304. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Allyson-Hadwin/publication/247664651_Studying_as_Self-Regulated_Learning/links/663d16347091b94e930f18f1/Studying-as-Self-Regulated-Learning.pdf

Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of Motivation: Evaluating an Underemphasized Aspect of Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3804_1

Yeo, J., & Tan, S. C. (2014). Redesigning problem-based learning in the knowledge creation paradigm for school science learning. Instructional Science, 42(5), 747–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9317-6

Yuanita, A., & Sugandi, A. I. (2018). Improving the Mathematical Connection Ability and Learning Independence of High School Students Through a Contextual Approach. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 1(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i1.p13-20




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v11i2.71809

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 Mimbar Sekolah Dasar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Mimbar Sekolah Dasar Stats