EVALUATION OF TEACHER READINESS USING THE CIPP MODEL IN LIMITED FACE-TO-FACE LEARNING

helda oktarina; Jasiah Jasiah; Setria Utama Rizal

doi:10.17509/eh.v14i1.40471

EVALUATION OF TEACHER READINESS USING THE CIPP MODEL IN LIMITED FACE-TO-FACE LEARNING

helda oktarina, Jasiah Jasiah, Setria Utama Rizal

Abstract

This study is to describe the readiness of teachers in Limited Face-to-face Learning (PTMT) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the 2021 academic year. This is motivated by the importance of teacher readiness in dealing with the Covid-19 pandemic, namely by implementing Limited Face-to-face Learning (PTMT). in the teaching and learning process. This study uses a method with a qualitative approach to the type of evaluation research using the CIPP model. The subjects of this study were two PAI subject teachers and Budi Pekerti. The results of this study indicate that teacher readiness is viewed from the four components in the CIPP model as follows; 1) the context component of teacher readiness in learning planning that the teacher downloads the lesson plans and syllabus from the internet. The learning objectives are not formulated based on the ABCD formula. Learning activities follow the lesson plans from the internet and there is no assessment in the lesson plans. LKPD uses multiple choice daily test sheets. Instructional media using the blackboard 2) The input component of teacher readiness in learning in terms of methods using lectures, questions and answers and assignments. The material aspect is taken in the student book. 3) The components of the learning process process, there are several activities that have not been carried out, such as the preliminary activities the teacher does not convey the learning objectives, in the core activities many learning steps are not carried out and in the closing activities the teacher does not conduct an assessment. 4) The product component of student learning outcomes is seen from the affective, cognitive and psychomotor aspects.

Keywords

evaluation, teacher readiness, CIPP model, limited PTM

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afrilia, D. (2021). Strategi Guru Dalam Melaksanakan Penilaian Pembelajaran Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Di Kelas Tinggi Sekolah Dasar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 1(1).

Asmawati. (2017). Meminimalkan Kesalahan Guru Kelas Dalam Penyusunan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) Melalui Pendampingan Berbasis KKG Semester Dua Tahun Pelajaran 2016/2017 Di SD Negeri 18 Mataram. JIME, 3(1).

Aswat, H., Sari, E. R., Aprilia, R., Fadli, A., & Milda. (2021). Implikasi Distance Learning Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Terhadap Kecerdasan Emosional Anak Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(2), 761.

Bangun, T. A. (2018). Analisis Kesesuaian Antara Komponen RPP Bahasa Indonesia Kelas VII Di SMP Negeri 14 Langsa Dan Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Budaya, 1(1).

Budiastuti, P., Soenarto, S., Muchlas, & Ramndani, H. W. (2021). Analisis Tujuan Pembelajaran dengan Kompetensi Dasar pada Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Dasar Listrik dan Elektronika di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Jurnal Edukasi Elektro, 5(1).

Efendi, S. (2018). Penerapan Metode Tanya Jawab Untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Bahasa Indonesia Siswa Kelas VI SD Negeri 012 Pangkalan Baru Kecamatan Siak Hulu. Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Riau, 7(7).

Gafur, A. (2012). Desain Pembelajaran: Konsep, Model, dan Aplikasinya dalam Perencanaan Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Ombak.

Jalal, M. (2020). Kesiapan Guru Menghadapi Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Di Masa Covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini, 2(1), 36.

Maemunawati, S., & Alif, M. (2020). Peran Guru, Orang Tua, Metode dan Media Pembelajaran: Strategi KBM di Masa Pandemi Covi-19. Banten: 3M Media Karya.

Makhrus, M., Harjono, A., Syukur, A., Bahri, S., & Muntari. (2018). Identifikasi Kesiapan LKPD Guru Terhadap Keterampilan Abad 21 Pada Pembelajaran IPA SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 3(2).

Mawardi. (2019). Optimalisasi Kompetensi Guru Dalam Penyusunan RPP. Jurnal Ilmiah DIDAKTIKA, 20(1), 69–82.

Mulyadi, E. (2014). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Malang: UIN-Maliki Press.

Nissa, S. F., & Haryanto, A. (2020). Implementasi Pembelajaran Tatap Muka di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal IKA PGSD (Ikatan Alumni PGSD) UNARS, 8(2), 402.

Pattanang, E., Lombong, M., & Tambunan, W. (2021). Perencanaan Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Di Masa Pandemi Pada SMK Kristen Tagara. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 10(2), 112.

Purwaningsih, L. (2018). Analisis Kesesuaian Antara Materi, Metode dan Media Pembelajaran Pada Mata Pelajaran PAI Di Kelas V SDN 2 Bapinang Hilir Laut. Palangkaraya: IAIN Palangka Raya.

Putria, H., Maulana, L. H., & Uswatun, D. A. (2020). Analisis Proses Pembelajaran Dalam Jaringan (DARING) Masa Pandemi COVID-19 pada Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(4), 871.

Ulya, M. A. W. (2021). Problematika Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Melalui Microsoft Teams pada Masa Pandemi. Jurnal pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah, 6(1).

Wahidmurni. (2020). Rencana

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v14i1.40471