Evaluasi Program Pengenalan Lapangan Satuan Pendidikan Bagi Calon Guru Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini

Deri Hendriawan, Nenden Sundari, Lizza Suzanti, Fatihaturosyidah Fatihaturosyidah

Abstract


Doing teaching at schools’ activity for the pre-service teacher students will give them experiences both practically and knowledgeably. Thus, this study is aimed to identify the difficulties and the barriers that the students experience while doing teaching at The Campus Partner Schools during The Teacher Training Program, also to reveal the teachers’ perceptions toward the students' pedagogical competences. The sample of this study are 12 kindergarten where the students running the program. This study was applied qualitative approach by conducting CIPP model. The data were collected through rating scale questionnaires, interviews and documentation. The data were analyzed in qualitative ways covers display data, reduction data and generalization. The results of this study indicate that there is a require for students to be able to improve their skills in formalizing their teaching lesson plan, conducting the teaching-learning activity, performing their social-personal skill, completing the teachers’ administration and additional work, also in giving students guidance and counselling service. All of these findings are the fruitful value to be consider for a better perform in next year program.

Keywords


CIPP, Evaluation of Training, Pre Service Kindergarten Teacher

References


Ali, M. (2003). The Use of Professional Development School for Developing Student-teachers Professional Competencies. In Proceeding Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education (pp. 5–18).

Ali, M. (2019). Research Methods in Sustainability Education. Bandung: UPI PRESS.

Ali, M., & Hayat, B. (2019). Non-academic factors influencing students’ achievement: a study in the Indonesian madrasahs. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 16(2), 180. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijlic.2019.098944

Arikunto, S. Safruddin,C & Jabar, A. (2008). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoretis Praktis bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Buku Panduan. (2020). Program Pengenalan Lapangan Satuan Pendidikan PPLSP Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Anak Usia Dini Program Sarjana Pendidikan. Divisi Pendidikan Profesi dan Jasa Keprofesian P2JK Direktorat Akademik Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: Sage Publication, Inc

Djaali dan Muljono,P. (2004). Pengukuran dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Fitzpatrick, Jody L., James R. Sanders, dan Blaine R. Worthen. (2004). Evaluation Program: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Guba, E.G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. (1989). Countenances of Fourth-Generation Evaluation: Description, Judgment, and Negotiation. ed. Dennis Palumbo. The Politics of Program Evaluation. California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Hendriawan, D. and Maulia, LNA. (2020). Integrated Teaching Material with Education for Sustainable Development on History Subject for High Schools Curriculum Development. Journal of Physics: Conference Series IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1477/4/042030

Hendriawan,D., Ali, M., Rusman. (2019). High School History Education and Education for Sustainable Development. An Integrated Curriculum Approach. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1179 IOP Publishing doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1179/1/012048

Joint Committee. (1991). Ukuran Baku untuk Evaluasi Program, Proyek dan Materi Pendidikan. terjemahan Rasdi Ekosiswoyo. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press.

Madaus, George F.,M S. Scriven, dan Stufflebeam, D L. (1983). Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

Mahmudi, Iwan (2011). CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jurnal At-Ta’dib 125 Vol. 6, No. 1, Juni

Nitko, Anthony J. (2001). Educational Assessment of Students. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Owen, John M. (1993). Evaluation Program: Forms and Approaches. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd.

Patton, Michael Quinn. (2004). Overview: Language Matters. New Directions for Evaluation Volume 2000 Issue 86. (http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/109752023/).

Scriven, Michael. (1976). The Intellectual Dimensions of Evaluation Research. makalah yang dipresentasikan dalam Northwest Research and Evaluation Conference. Seattle. (http:// www.google co.id / Michael.Scriven / The.Intellectual.Dimensionsof.Evaluation+Research).

Smith, M. F. (2004) Evaluation Utilization Revisited. New Directions for Program Evaluation. Volume 1988 Issue 39. November (http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/109751386).

Stufflebeam, Daniel L., dan Anthony J. Shinkfield. (2007). Systematic Evaluation: A Self-Instructional Guide to Theory and Practice. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

Tim Pengembang MKDP Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. (2013). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Rajawali Pers Bandung

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia (2003) No 20 tahun tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia (2015) No 14 Tahun tentang Guru Dan Dosen


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.