Focus and Scope

INFANTIA adalah jurnal ilmiah open akses yang secara berkala yang diterbitkan oleh Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Kampus Serang. Infantia diterbitkan dua kali satu tahun (Juli dan Desember) yang mempublikasikan hasil penelitian orisinal tentang pendidikan guru AUD dan topik lain seputar pendidikan AUD. Infantia menerbitkan artikel pada lingkup pendidikan dan pengasuhan dalam cakupan konsep, teori, paradigma, pendekatan, dan metodologi dalam kajian ilmu pendidikan anak usia dini.

Ruang Lingkup Infantia meliputi:

- Kurikulum PAUD
- Manajemen PAUD
- Media dan Inovasi Pembelajaran AUD
- Gizi dan Kesehatan AUD
- Pembelajaran AUD
- Parenting pada AUD
- Isu-isu Kekinian AUD
- Topik lain yang relevan dengan AUD

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

The journal operates a peer review process and promotes blind reviewing. The acceptance or rejection of articles will be decided by the editorial boards based on the review results supplied by the reviewers. There are no communications between authors and editors concerning the rejection decision. Before going to review process, all manuscripts will be checked that they are free from plagiarism practice using "Turnitin" software. If there an indication of plagiarism, the manuscript will instantly be rejected. Authors whose papers are rejected will be informed with the reasons of the rejection

Publication Frequency

INFANTIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini published 2 (two) issues in 1 (one) year with details of the number 1 (one) in June and Desember. Each number contained 12 articles (total 24 articles per year)

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Publication Ethics

Infantia is a peer-reviewed electronic international journal. This journal follows guidelines from Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) facing all aspects of publication ethics and, in particular, how to handle cases of research and publication misconduct. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer­­­­­ and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

Publication article in Infantia Journal: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.

The publisher of Infantia Journal: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the publisher and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Infantia Journal: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed

Errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the pape

Publication Fee

Infantia does not charge for submission and any processing or publishing fees for every regular articles published before 2022. For special issue articles and published 2022 so on, IDR 200.000 charges will apply.

Abstract And Index

GARUDA

SINTA

GOOGLE SCHOLAR

COPERNICUS

CROSSREF

DIMENSIONS

Ethics Statement

To submit the article, author (s) must submit an ethic statement. The ethic statement can be downloaded in here. In short, Author(s)’ Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement including the following statement:

 Author(s)’ Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

 The undersigned

 1) Name:_______________________________________

     Affiliation: ____________________________________

 2) Name: _______________________________________

     Affiliation: ____________________________________

 3) Name:_______________________________________

     Affiliation: ____________________________________

 4) Name: _______________________________________

 Affiliation: ____________________________________

  hereby declare that I/we:

 1) accept and comply with IJPAUD’s publication ethics and publication malpractice statement.

 2) the manuscript entitled:

 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 I/we sent to IJPAUD’s for its .................... edition is my/our original work which is free from plagiarism and has not been published before either in printed or online and is not being sent to/reviewed by other publishers.

 3) agree with the final version of the manuscript sent by IJPAUD’s editors as the final proof.

 Signed: ___________________ Date ______________

 Signed: ___________________ Date ______________

 Signed: ___________________ Date ______________

 Signed: ___________________ Date ______________

Plagiarism Screening

Before going to review process, all manuscripts will be checked that they are free from plagiarism practice using "Turnitin" software. If there an indication of plagiarism, the manuscript will instantly be rejected.