Preliminary Design of Learning the Lowest Common Multiple (LCM) and Greatest Common Factor (GCF) Using the RADEC Learning Model

Muhammad Rifqi Mahmud, Turmudi Turmudi, Wahyu Sopandi

Abstract


Learning obstacles were found in students who studied LCM and GCF. This research aims to develop an initial design in the form of a hypothetical learning trajectory for LCM and GCF using the RADEC (Read, Answer, Discuss, Explanation, and Create) learning model which is based on obstacles learning findings. This research is part of the design research method. The design research method consists of preliminary design, teaching experiment, and retrospective analysis. The focus of this research is the preliminary design stage. Based on the results, it is known that students have difficulties in solving questions on LCM and GCF material, namely that students cannot use the concepts of LCM and GCF to solve problems, students tend to think that the concepts of LCM and GCF are only factor trees or procedural factorization, and students do not understand the concepts of LCM and GCF. To overcome these learning obstacles, a hypothetical learning trajectory for the LCM and GCF was prepared using the RADEC learning model which was divided into three meetings. The first meeting was about multiples, common multiple, and LCM. The second meeting was about factors, common factors, and GCF. The third meeting was regarding determining the LCM and GCF using prime factorization. Each learning flow from each meeting is described in the form of HLT which consists of learning objectives, learning activities, and student thinking estimates. The theoretical implications in this research are the new findings of HLT LCM and GCF with the RADEC learning model and practical implications in this research are that HLT can be used as a consideration for teachers in designing LCM and GCF learning by paying attention to students' learning trajectories.

Keywords


Design Research; GCF; LCM; RADEC

References


Alim, J. A., Sari, I. K., Alpusari, M., Sulastio, A., Mulyani, E. A., Putra, R. A., & Hermita, N. (2020). Interactive Multimedia Development on LCM and GCF Material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1655(1), 012090. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1655/1/012090

Aqeel, I. A. (2024). Improving Methods of Finding the Least Common Multiple and the Greatest Common Divisor Using Conceptual Map. 21(S3), 1468–1479. https://migrationletters.com/index.php/ml/article/view/7482

A’yun, N. Q., & Rahmawati, I. (2018). Pengembangan Media Interaktif Si Pontar Berbasis Aplikasi Android Materi KPK dan FPB Mata Pelajaran Matematika Kelas IV SD [Development of Si Pontar Interactive Media Based on Android Applications for LCM and GCF Mathematics Subjects for Grade IV Elementary School]. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 6(2), 254773. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-penelitian-pgsd/article/view/23410

Bintaş, J., & Çamlı, H. (2009). The effect of computer-aided instruction on students’ success in solving LCM and GCF problems. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 277–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.050

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2020). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. Routledge.

Desriyati, W., Mashadi, M., & Gemawati, S. (2015). Cara Lain Menentukan FPB dan KPK [Other Ways to Determine LCM and GCF]. Jurnal Sains Matematika Dan Statistika, 1(1), 52–55. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jsms.v1i1.1973

Fauzan, A., Yerizon, Y., & Yulianti, D. (2020). The RME-based local instructional theory for teaching LCM and GCF in primary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1554(1), 012078. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1554/1/012078

Fitri Nuraini, T., Cahyani Haditia, N., Rahman Hakim, A., & Indah Sari, N. (2022). Fostering Students’ Mathematical Communication Skills in Mathematics Learning. In ISEJ: Indonesian Science Education Journal (Vol. 3, Issue 1). https://siducat.org/index.php/isej/article/view/593

Gravemeijer, K. (2012). Local instruction theories as means of support for teachers in reform mathematics education. In Hypothetical Learning Trajectories (pp. 105–128). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_3

Hadi, S. (2015). Scaffolding dalam Menyelesaikan Permasalahan KPK dan FPB [Scaffolding in Resolving LCM and GCF Problems]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21154/ibriez.v1i1.16

Handayani, H., Sopandi, W., Syaodih, E., Setiawan, D., & Suhendra, I. (2019). Dampak perlakuan model pembelajaran radec bagi calon guru terhadap kemampuan merencanakan pembelajaran di sekolah dasar [The impact of the radec learning model treatment for prospective teachers on the ability to plan learning in elementary schools]. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 79–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v4i1.1857

Karsenty, R. (2020). Mathematical ability. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 494–497.

Kelana, J. B., Sopandi, W., Firdaus, A. R., Maulana, Y., Fasha, L. H., & Fiteriani, I. (2022). Kemampuan Guru Sekolah Dasar dalam Membuat Pertanyaan Pra Pembelajaran Menggunakan Model RADEC [Elementary School Teachers' Ability to Create Pre-Learning Questions Using the RADEC Model]. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 8(4), 1171–1180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v8i4.2688

Khairiyah, U. (2019). Respon siswa terhadap media dakon matika materi KPK dan FPB pada siswa kelas IV di SD/MI Lamongan [Student responses to dakon matika media, LCM and GCF material in class IV students at SD/MI Lamongan]. Jurnal Studi Kependidikan Dan Keislaman, 5(2), 197–204. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.53627/jam.v5i2.3476

Kusumaningpuri, A. R., & Fauziati, E. (2021). Model pembelajaran RADEC dalam perspektif filsafat konstruktivisme Vygotsky [The RADEC learning model in the perspective of Vygotsky's constructivism philosophy]. Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 103–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikandasar.v3i2.1169

Latifah, N., Wakhyudin, H., & Cahyadi, F. (2020). Miskonsepsi Penyelesaian Soal Cerita Matematika Materi KPK dan FPB Sekolah Dasar [Misconceptions about Solving Mathematics Story Problems for Elementary School LCM and GCF Material]. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 181-195. https://doi.org/10.26618/jrpd.v3i2.4078

Mahmud, M. R., Turmudi, T., Sopandi, W., Rohimah, S. M., & Pratiwi, I. M. (2023). Learning obstacles analysis of lowest common multiple and greatest common factor in primary school. Jurnal Elemen, 9(2), 440–449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i2.12359

Marsena, N., Fauzan, A., & Gistituati, N. (2021). Development ff Problem-Based Mathematics Teaching Materials for Elementary School Students. International Journal of Education Dynamics, 3(2), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.24036/ijeds.v3i2.303

Meilani, M., & Maspupah, A. (2019). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah SD pada materi KPK dan FPB [Analysis of elementary school problem solving abilities in LCM and GCF material]. Journal On Education, 2(1), 25–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v2i1.264

Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif [Qualitative Research Methodology]. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mufidah, M., Akina, A., & Fauziah, S. (2021). Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita FPB dan KPK di Sekolah Dasar [Students' Mistakes in Solving LCM and GCF Story Questions in Elementary Schools]. Jurnal Kreatif Online, 9(2), 111–118. https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/3184869

Nugraha, T., & Prabawanto, S. (2021). The Enhancement of Students’ Mathematical Conceptual Understanding Through RADEC Learning Model. Eduma: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 167–177. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v10i2.9073

Nurgiyantoro, B. (2010). Penilaian pembelajaran sastra berbasis kompetensi [Competency-based literature learning assessment]. Yogyakarta: BPFe.

Patan, R. & Martinez, R. (2018). Finding Greatest Common Factor and Least Common Multiple Using Alternative Method. EPRA International Journal of Research and Development, 3(6), 64-69. https://eprajournals.com/IJSR/article/803

Pohan, A. A., Abidin, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2020). Model Pembelajaran Radec Dalam Pembelajaran Membaca Pemahaman Siswa [Radec Learning Model in Learning Students' Reading Comprehension]. Seminar Internasional Riksa Bahasa, 250–258. http://proceedings.upi.edu/index.php/riksabahasa/article/view/1354

Pratama, Y. A., Sopandi, W., Hidayah, Y., & Trihatusti, M. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran RADEC terhadap keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa sekolah dasar [The influence of the RADEC learning model on elementary school students' higher order thinking skills]. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 6(2), 191–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v6i2.12653

Ramadhani, K., Witri, G., & Fendrik, M. (2023). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran RADEC (Read, Answer, Discussion, Explaining and Create) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas V SDN 194 Pekanbaru [The Influence of the RADEC Learning Model (Read, Answer, Discussion, Explaining and Create) on the Mathematics Learning Outcomes of Class V Students at SDN 194 Pekanbaru]. El-Ibtidaiy: Journal of Primary Education, 6(2), 190–199. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/ejpe.v6i2.23709

Rohimah, S. M., Darta, D., & Anggraeni, R. I. (2022). Analisis Learning Obstacles Pada Materi Pecahan Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar [Analysis of Learning Obstacles in Fraction Material for Class IV Elementary School Students]. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 7(2), 171–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v7i2.6386

Simon, M. A. & Tzur, R. (2012). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. In Hypothetical learning trajectories (pp. 91–104). Routledge.

Sopandi, W. (2017). The quality improvement of learning processes and achievements through the read-answer-discuss-explain-and-create learning model implementation. Proceeding 8th Pedagogy International Seminar, 8, 132–139.

Sopandi, W. (2019). Sosialisasi dan Workshop Implementasi Model Pembelajaran RADEC Bagi Guru-Guru Pendidikan dasar dan Menengah [Socialization and Workshop on Implementation of the RADEC Learning Model for Primary and Secondary Education Teachers]. Pedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(1), 19–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v8i1.1853

Widjaja, W. (2008). Local instruction theory on decimals: The case of Indonesian pre-service teachers. University of Melbourne, Science and Mathematics Education Cluster.

Yantoro, Y., Kurniawan, D. A., Perdana, R., & Rivani, P. A. (2021). A Survey of Process Skills Mathematics Learning in Elementary School. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 54(3). https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v54i3.37180

Yensy, N. A. (2020). Metode Alternatif Menentukan KPK dan FPB Suatu Bilangan Bulat dengan Menggunakan Alat Peraga [Alternative Method for Determining the LCM and GCF of an Integer Using Visual Tools]. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 4(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.4.2.107-114

Yuliany, N., Latuconsina, N. K., Abrar, A. I. P., & Wahyuni, I. (2023). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran RADEC (Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain, Create) terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Peserta Didik [The Effect of Applying the RADEC Learning Model (Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain, Create) on Students' Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability]. Al Asma: Journal of Islamic Education, 5(2), 133–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/asma.v5i2.41523

Yuza, A., Madona, A. S., Azkiya, H., Yulisna, R., & Harun, G. J. (2023). Validasi E-Modul Berbasis Radec Materi KPK Dan FPB Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar [Validation of Radec-Based E-Modules for LCM and GCF Material for Class IV Elementary Schools]. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 11(2), 373–383. https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/3581175




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v11i2.71837

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 Mimbar Sekolah Dasar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Mimbar Sekolah Dasar Stats