Posisi Liminal Batik Tulis Tenun Gedog Sanggar Sekar Ayu Wilujeng dalam Glokalisasi
Abstract
This study aims to discuss the liminality of Gedog woven batik in its position as a product of Indonesian art and culture in glocalization. This research begins by discussing the historiography of batik and the problems of batik in global cultural treasures, the identification of the batik motifs of the Gedog woven at Sanggar Sekar Ayu Wilujeng, and conservation efforts undertaken in the global arena, in terms of glocalization. This study used a qualitative descriptive analytic study, which was conducted at Sanggar Sekar Ayu Wilujeng, Tuban Regency, East Java. Primary data of the study were obtained by direct observation at Sanggar Sekar Ayu Wilujeng and documentation study related to the woven batik Gedog. Furthermore, data analysis was carried out by looking at historiography, development of form, meaning, and philosophy, development of its use or functionalias, and the liminal position of gedog woven batik in glocalization. The results showed that the liminal position of Gedog woven batik at Sanggar Sekar Ayu Wilujeng placed it in a strategic position in the global arena as an effort to preserve and preserve Indonesia's cultural assets. Batik motifs, conceptualization, manufacture, and use of hand-woven batik gedog are still preserved by their sacredness and initial philosophy until now. This is because the hand-woven batik gedog embodies the people of Tuban Regency through its motives. Furthermore, the locality that is in the woven batik gedog is strengthened, and is reflected back to the global scene as glocalization. The reflection process is an institutional isomorphism mechanism for the handmade batik of Sanggar Sekar Ayu Wilujeng as a cultural product, and as an effort to preserve cultural products.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membahas liminalitas batik tulis tenun gedog dalam posisioningnya sebagai produk seni budaya Indonesia dalam glokalisasi. Penelitian ini diawali dengan membahas historiografi batik dan permasalahan batik dalam khasanah kebudayaan global, identifikasi motif batik tulis tenun gedog Sanggar Sekar Ayu Wilujeng, dan upaya pelestarian yang dilakukan dalam kancah global, dalam istilah glokalisasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan kualitatif dengan penjabaran deskriptif analitik, yang dilakukan di Sanggar Sekar Ayu Wilujeng, Kabupaten Tuban, Jawa Timur. Penelitian dilakukan pada Januari 2019 hingga Januari 2020, terhitung mulai dari pengajuan rencana penelitian, hingga penulisan artikel terkait batik tulis tenun gedog. Data primer penelitian didapatkan dengan observasi secara langsung di Sanggar Sekar Ayu Wilujeng dan studi dokumentasi terkait batik tulis tenun gedog. Selanjutnya, analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan melihat historiografi, perkembangan bentuk, makna, dan filosofi, perkembangan penggunaannya atau fungsionaliasnya, dan posisi liminal batik tulis tenun gedog dalam glokalisasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa posisi liminal batik tulis tenun gedog Sanggar Sekar Ayu Wilujeng menempatkannya dalam posisi strategis dalam kancah global sebagai upaya pelestarian dan aset budaya Indonesia. Motif batik, konseptualisasi, pembuatan, dan pemanfaatan batik tulis tenun gedog masih terjaga kesakralan dan filosofi awalnya sampai saat ini. Hal ini dikarenakan batik tulis tenun gedog menubuh dengan masyarakat Kabupaten Tuban melalui motif-motifnya. Selanjutnya, lokalitas yang ada di dalam batik tulis tenun gedog diperkuat, dan dipantulkan kembali ke kancah global sebagai glokalisasi. Proses refleksi tersebut merupakan mekanisme isomorfisme institusional terhadap batik tulis tenun gedog Sanggar Sekar Ayu Wilujeng sebagai produk budaya, dan sebagai upaya pelestarian produk budaya.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, K. M. (2006). Art as Politics: Re-Crafting Identities, Tourism, and Power in Tana Toraja, Indonesia. University of Hawai’i Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139033824.002
Bowen, D. H., Greene, J. P., & Kisida, B. (2014). Learning to Think Critically: A visual Art Experiment. Educational Researcher, 43(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13512675
Carrier, D. (2006). Art and Its Preservation. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 43(3), 291. https://doi.org/10.2307/430643
Chairiyani, R. P. (2014). Semiotika Batik Larangan di Yogyakarta. Humaniora, 5(2), 1177. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v5i2.3260
Chen, D., & Cheng, P. (2020). A method to extract batik fabric pattern and elements. Journal of the Textile Institute. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2020.1802885
Cheung, C. kiu, & Ho, wing whung. (2012). Investing in Community Participation to Receive Social Support. Journal of Social Service Research, 38(1), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2011.626352
Clark, M. (2013). The politics of heritage: Indonesia-Malaysia cultural contestations. Indonesia and the Malay World, 41(121), 396–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2013.804979
Cohen, M. I. (2014). Introduction: Global Encounters in Southeast Asian Performing Arts. Asian Theatre Journal, 31(2), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1353/atj.2014.0047
Cook-Sather, A., & Alter, Z. (2011). What Is and What Can Be: How a Liminal Position Can Change Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 42(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1492.2010.01109.x
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Dan Mixed. Pustaka Pelajar.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Fifth Edit). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1319-x
Dian Puji, S., Raharjo, D. P., & Sunarya, I. K. (2019). Traditional Batik as Education Media of 21st Century Art in Shaping Creativity. 2nd International Conference on Art and Arts Education (ICAAE 2018), 327, 226–228. https://doi.org/10.2991/icaae-18.2019.44
Elliott, I. M., Haake, A., Harper, D., Hope, J., Majlis, B. K., Smend, R., Soleau, A., Winotosastro, H., & Wronska-Friend, M. (2016). Batik, Traditional Textiles of Indonesia. Tuttle.
Eric, Z. (2007). Glocalisation, Art Exhibitions and the Balkans. Third Text, 21(2), 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528820701273547
Facca, A. E., & Aldrich, J. W. (2011a). Putting the Past to Work for the Future. The Public Historian, 33(3), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2011.33.3.38
Facca, A. E., & Aldrich, J. W. (2011b). Putting the Past to Work for the Future. The Public Historian, 33(3), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2011.33.3.38
Fischer-Lichte, E. (2019). Culture as Performance. Modern Austrian Literature, 43(Special Issue: Performance), 1–10.
Francis-Lindsay, J. (2009). The Intrinsic Value of Cultural Heritage and its Relationship to Sustainable Tourism Development: The Contrasting Experiences of Jamaica and Japan. Caribbean Quarterly, 55(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00086495.2009.11829763
Gell, A. (2006). Technology of Enchantment and Enchantment of Technology. In E. Hirsch (Ed.), The Art of Antrophology Essay and Diagrams. Athlone Press.
Gottsscalk, L. (1996). Mengerti Sejarah. UI Press.
Graham, G. (1997). Philosophy of the Art. Routledge.
Grierson, E. (2011). Art and Creativity in the Global Economies of Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(4), 336–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00550.x
Grossman, J. (2017). Adaptation in Visual Culture. In Adaptation in Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58580-2
Gude, O. (2018). Principles of Possibility: Considerations for a 21st-century Art and Culture Curriculum. Art Education, 60(1), 6–17.
Hall, S. (2002). Representations: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Sage Publications.
Hanley, J. (2012). The art of batik. Irish Arts Review, 29(1), 118–119.
Hapsari, W. (2016). Transformasi Hough Linear Untuk Analisis Dan Pengenalan Batik Motif Parang. Jurnal Informatika, 11(2), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.21460/inf.2015.112.412
Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (2012). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295636
Hochstrasser, J. B. (2011). Batik Belanda: Transformed identities cross boundaries in the visual arts (Or: Eliza van Zuylen and creativity at the margins). Dutch Crossing, 35(2), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1179/155909011X13033128278641
Hoogenboom, M., Bannink, D., & Trommel, W. (2010). From local to grobal, and back. Business History, 52(6), 932–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2010.511183
Innocenti, P. (2019). Preventing Digital Casualties : An Interdisciplinary Research for Preserving Digital Art. Leonardo, 45(5), 472–473.
Ismail, T., Wiyantoro, L. S., Meutia, & Muchlish, M. (2012). Strategy, Interactive Control System and National Culture: A Case Study of Batik Industry in Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65(ICIBSoS), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.087
Jones, T. (2018). International intangible cultural heritage policy in the neighbourhood: an assessment and case study of Indonesia. Journal of Cultural Geography, 35(3), 362–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873631.2018.1429351
Joshi, R. J. (2011). High Performance Culture. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 37(Developing a Culture of High Performance), 18–30.
Kadt, E. de. (2001). Arts, Crafts and Cultural Manifestations. Ekistics, 48(288), 244–247.
Kartodirdjo, S. (2016). Pendekatan Ilmu Sosial dalam Metodologi Sejarah. Ombak.
Keeble, B. (2009). God and Work: Aspects of Art and Tradition. World Wisdom.
Khondker, H. (2004). Glocalization as globalization: Evolution of a sociological concept. Bangladesh E-Journal of Sociology, 1(2), 1–9.
Kibbey, J. S. (2011). Media Literacy and Social Justice in a Visual World. Counterpoints, 403(Engaging Students in Glocal Issues through the Arts), 50–61. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42981595
Kitley, P. (2012). Ornamentation and Originality: Involution in Javanese Batik. Indonesia, 53(53), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/3351111
Koentjaraningrat. (1987). Sejarah Teori Antropologi. UI Press.
Krestanto, H. (2018). Potensi Batik sebagai Daya Tarik Desa Wisata (Studi di Kecamatan Bayat Kabupaten Klaten Propinsi Jawa Tengah). Jurnal Media Wisata, 16(2), 1077–1083.
Krevitsky, N. (2014). The Art of Batik Today. Art Education, 17(8), 15–31.
Kuntowijoyo. (2008). Penjelasan Sejarah. Tiara Wacana.
Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.
Lewis, J. R., & Hammer, O. (Eds.). (2007). The Invention of Sacred Tradition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488450.004
Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (Ninth edit). Pearson.
Magat, M. C. (2014). In Search of Southeast Asian Folklorists. Western Folklore, 73(2–3), 280–296.
Maryunani, S. R. (2019). Community Empowerment as a Means in Promoting Local Products: A Case Study in Bandung, Indonesia. Journal of Promotion Management, 25(3), 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2019.1557821
Mills, K. A. (2019). Big Data for Qualitative Research. In Routledge Focus. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056413
Mulyadi, D. (2009). Batik, Citra Tradisi Indonesia. BPPI.
Mura, P., & Khoo-Lattimore, C. (Eds.). (2018). Asian Qualitative Research in Tourism: Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies, and Methods. Springer Singapore.
Muzaffar, I., & Otero-Pailos, J. (2015). Preservation and Globalization. Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1353/fta.2012.0007
Nordin, R., & Bakar, S. S. A. (2012). Malaysian batik industry: Protecting local batik design by copyright and industrial design laws. International Journal of Business and Society, 13(2), 117–132.
Novani, S., Putro, U. S., & Hermawan, P. (2015). Value Orchestration Platform: Promoting Tourism in Batik Industrial Cluster Solo. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169(August 2014), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.304
Nurainun, Hariyana, & Rasyimah. (2011). Analisis Industri Batik Di Indonesia. Fokus Ekonomi, 7(3), 124–135.
Richardson, J. T. (2010). People’s Temple and Jonestown: A Corrective Comparison and Critique. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 19(3), 239. https://doi.org/10.2307/1385862
Roudometof, V. (2016). Theorizing glocalization: Three interpretations. European Journal of Social Theory, 19(3), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431015605443
Salma, I. R., Eskak, E., & Nugroho, A. A. (2016). Kreasi Batik Kupang. Dinamika Kerajinan Dan Batik: Majalah Ilmiah, 33(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.22322/dkb.v33i1.1040
Sartika, D., Eskak, E., & Sunarya, I. K. (2017). Uma Lengge Dalam Kreasi Batik Bima. Dinamika Kerajinan Dan Batik: Majalah Ilmiah, 34(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.22322/dkb.v34i2.3365
Shkedi, A. (2019). Introduction to Data Analysis in Qualitative Research. Springer International Publishing.
Shuqin, S. (2012). Cultural and Creative Industries and Art Education. Physics Procedia, 33, 1652–1656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.05.266
Situngkir, H. (2011). The Phylomemetics of Batik. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1481394
Soedarso Sp. (2000). Sejarah Perkembangan Seni Rupa Modern. Badan Penerbit ISI Yogyakarta.
Soedarsono, R. M. (1999). Seni Pertunjukan Indonesia dan Pariwisata. Masyarakat Seni Pertunjukan Indonesia.
Soemardjo, J. (2000). Filsafat Seni. Penerbit ITB.
Somekh, B. (2006). Action Research : a Methodology for Change and Development. Open University Press.
Steelyana, E. (2012). Batik, A Beautiful Cultural Heritage that Preserve Culture and Supporteconomic Development in Indonesia. Binus Business Review, 3(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v3i1.1288
Stephenson, N. (2013). The Past, Present, and Future of Javanese Batik: A Bibliographic Essay. Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 12(3), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1086/adx.12.3.27948560
Stevens, M. L. (2018). Culture and Education. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 619(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716208320043
Svasek, M. (Ed.). (2012). Moving Subjects, Moving Objects: Transnationalism, Cultural Production and Emotions. Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Svasek, M. (2015). Affective Moves: Transit, Transition and Transformation. December.
Tilaar, H. A. R. (2012). Perubahan Sosial dan Pendidikan. Rineka Cipta.
Trafi-Prats, L. (2010). Art Historical Appropriation in a Visual Culture-based Art Education. Studies in Art Education, 50(2), 152–166.
Warren, C. (2012). Risk and the Sacred: Environment, Media and Public Opinion in Bali. Oceania, 82(ENVIRONMENTAL CONTESTS; ANTHROPOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES), 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1834-4461.2012.tb00135.x
Weeren-Griek, H. Van. (1949). Indonesian Art: Batik and Puppetry Art-Crafts of the East Indies. Design, 50(8), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00119253.1949.10742866
Wessing, R. (2019). Wearing the Cosms: Symbolism in Batik Design. Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 2(3), 40–82.
Winataputra, U. S. (2008). Multikulturalisme-Bhinneka Tunggal lka Dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Sebagai Wahana Pembangunan Karakter Bangsa Indonesia. In Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (Vol. 14, Issue 75, pp. 1009–1027). https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v14i75.364
Young, M. B. (2019). Patience, Faith, and the Temple in 2019. Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, 52(1), 169–178.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jlb.v11i2.28005
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 LOKABASA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.