ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ABOUT LEARNING AND ITS VARIOUS TYPES OF ASSESSMENT

Tony Hadibarata, Achmad Syafiuddin

Abstract


Students’ perception of assessments can serve as a guiding light for improving overall educational practices. A questionnaire was collected from 80 engineering student to discover students' perceptions of different types of assessment and their overall perceptions of various type of assessments advantages in enhancing learning experiences. The majority of students strongly agreed that quiz and case study was beneficial and helpful for enhancing learning experience in engineering courses. On the contrary, project presentation, journal review, essay, interview, and demonstration was seemed unhelpful for students to enhance their learning experience. In terms of enjoyment, a discrepancy was found for what engineering students’ perceived as important assessment tools for learning and what they actually enjoy doing.


Keywords


critical thinking; learning experience; oral assessment; student perception; written-assessment

References


Artwe, J. (1997). Using assessment as a tool for learning, In R. Blum & J. Arter (Eds.), Student performance assessment in an era of restructuring (pp. 1‐6). Alexandria, VA; Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (2nd ed). Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

Dochy, F. J. R. C. & Mcdowell, L. (1997) Assessment as a tool for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23, 279‐298.

Dochy, Y, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self‐, peer and co‐assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 331‐350.

Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self‐assessment in higher education: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 59, 395–430.

Huxham, M., Campbell, F., & Westwood, J. (2012). Oral versus written assessments: a test of student performance and attitudes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37, 125-136.

Knowles, M.S., Holton, E.F., & Swanson, R.A. (2005). The Adult Learner (6th ed). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

Malpas, R. S. (2000) The Universe of Engineering – A UK Perspective, London: The Royal Academy of Engineering.

O’Neil, G., & Mcmahon, T. (2005). Student‐centered learning: What does it mean for students and lecturers? In G. O’Neil, S. Moore & B. McMullin (Eds.), Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching (pp. 27‐36). Dublin: AISHE.

Savin-Baden, M. (2003) Facilitating Problem-based Learning: the other side of silence, Buckingham: SRHE/Open University Press

Sivan, A., Wong Leung, R., Woon, C. & Kember, D. (2000) ‘An implementation of active learning and its effect on the quality of student learning’, Innovations in Education and Training International, 37, 381–389.

Uhles, N., Weimer-Elder, B., & Lee, J.G. (2008). Simulation game provides financial management training. Healthcare Financial Management, 62, 82–88.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v23i1.8930

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching 

All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616

Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

 

View JPMIPA Stats