Email this article 
PREFERENSI DAN PERSEPSI PERSONAL PESERTA TERHADAP KONTEN BIOLOGI YANG MENJADI FOKUS PENELITIAN SELAMA MENGIKUTI PENDIDIKAN PROFESI GURU
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Artikel ini menyajikan hasil penelitian tentang perkembangan preferensi dan persepsi personal peserta program pendidikan profesi guru. Penelitian longitudinal ini dilakukan di salah satu universitas penyelenggara pendidikan profesi guru biologi di Indonesia selama satu setengah tahun. Sejumlah 23 peserta program pendidikan profesi guru biologi yang menjadi subyek penelitian ini memiliki latar belakang akademik sarjana biologi dan tidak memiliki pengalaman melaksanakan penelitian pendidikan. Dokumen rancangan dan laporan penelitian tindakan kelas peserta selama mengikuti pendidikan profesi guru merupakan sumber data utama penelitian yang menggunakan desain penelitian campuran tipe eksploratori sekuensial. Kuesioner tentang kemampuan konten biologi merupakan instrumen pendukung yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa preferensi tema konten biologi peserta selalu berubah. Persepsi personal peserta terhadap konten biologi yang dipilihnya sebagai fokus penelitian juga bervariasi. Sebagai tambahan, pemilihan konten yang dijadikan fokus penelitian tidak terkait dengan kepercayaan diri peserta terhadap pemahaman konten yang dimilikinya.
ABSTRACT
This paper presents results of study on the development of professional training program participants’ personal perceptions and preferences toward biology content which were used as their research subject along the program. This longitudinal study was carried out in one of universities which conducted professional training program. As many as 23 participants have an undergraduate degree in biology and did have not educational research experience. The main data source for this sequential exploratory research design was participants’ classroom action research document which was analyzed along the program. Questionnaire on biological content capabilities was used as an additional instrument to identify participant’s personal perception. Results showed that biology content themes used are always changing. Personal perception of participants according to biology content also varied. In addition, biology content chosen as research focus was not related with the level of complexity of the content and participants self-efficacy.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abernathy-Dyer, J., Ortlieb, E., dan Cheek, E.H. (2013). An analysis of teacher efficacy and perspectives about elementary literacy instruction. Current Issues in Education Vol. 16 No. 3, hlm. 1-12.
Aulls, M.W., dan Shore, B.M. (2008). Inquiry in Education; The Conceptual Foundations for Research as a Curricular Imperative, Volume I. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Cameron, R.A. (2009). Sequential mixed model research sedign: design, analytical and display issues. International Journal of Multiple Research Approach Vol. 3 No.2 hlm. 140-152.
Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational Research, Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 3rd Ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the american future. Journal of Teacher Education Vol. 61 No. 1-2, hlm. 35-47.
Dick, B. (2009). Action research literature 2006-2008; Themes and trends. Action Research Vol. 7 No. 4, hlm.423-441.
Dobber, M., Akkerman, S.F., Verloop, N., dan Vermunt, J.D. (2012). Student Teachers’ Collaborative Research: Small-Scale Research Projects During Teacher Education. Teaching and Teacher Education Vol. 28, hlm. 609-617.
Dustman, E.L., Kohan, M.B., dan Stringer, E.T. (2014). Starting small & building out with Erni Stringer: Personal insigh into action research and educational change. Action Research Vol. 12 No.4, hlm. 426-443.
Frankel, J.R. dan Wallen, N.E. (2008). How to design and evaluate research in education. Seventh edition. New York: McGrawHill
Freund, P.A. dan Kasten, N. (2012). How smart do you think you are? A meta-analysis on the validity of self-estimates of cognitive ability. Psychological bulletin Vol. 138, hlm. 296-321.
Grossman, P., et al. (2009). Teaching practice: a cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record Vol. 11 No.9, hlm. 2055-2100.
Gustavsen, B. (2014). Social impact and the justification of action research knowledge. Action Research Vol. 12 No.4, hlm. 339-356.
Haigh, M., Ell, F., Mackisack, V. (2013). Judging teacher candidates’ readiness to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education Vol. 34, hlm. 1-11.
Hopkins, D. (2008). A Teacher’s Guide to Classroom Research 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill-Open University Press.
Kember, D. & Ginns, P. (2012 ). Evaluating Teaching and Learning: a Practical Handbook for Colleges, Universities and The Scholarship of Teaching. Oxon: Routledge.
Kitchen, J., dan Stevens, D. (2008). Action research in teacher education: Two teacher-educators practice action research as they introduce action research to preservice teachers. Action Research Vol. 6 No.1, hlm. 7-28.
Lanas, M., dan Kelchtermans, G. (2015). This has more to do who I am than with my skills-Student teacher subjectification in Finnish teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education Vol. 47 No. 1, hlm. 22-29.
Maxwell, S.V. (2014). Mirror, mirror on the wall: email as an object of practitioner inquiry. Educational Action Research Vol. 23 No.2, hlm.1-19.
Mc Connell, T.J., Parker, J.M., dan Eberhardt, J.(2013). Assessing teachers’ science content knowledge: a strategy for assessing depth of understanding. Journal of Science Teacher Education Vol. 24 No. 4, hlm.717-743.
Rustaman, N.Y. (2010). Pengembangan pembelajaran sains berbasis kemampuan dasar bekerja ilmiah. dalam Hidayat, T et al. (Penyunting). Teori, Paradigma, Prinsip, dan pendekatan Pembelajaran MIPA dalam konteks Indonesia (211-248). Bandung: FPMIPA UPI.
Phillips, D.K., dan Carr, K. (2012). Becoming a Teacher through Action Research. Edisi kedua. New York: Routledge.
Pring. (2006). Philosophy of Educational Research. Edisi kedua. London: Continuum.
Frankel, J.R. dan Wallen, N.E. (2015). Philosophy of Educational Research. Edisi ketiga. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
Sari, E.R. (2012). Online learning community: a case study of teacher professional development in Indonesia. Intercultural Education Vol. 23 No.1, hlm.63-72.
Soebari, T.S., dan Aldridge, J.M. (2015). Using student perception of the learning environment to evaluate the effectiveness of a teacher professional evelopment programme. Learning Environment Research Vol. 1, hlm. 164-178.
Sumintono, B. dan Widhiarso, W. Aplikasi model rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial.Cimahi: Trim Komunika Publishing House.
Swinkels, M.F.J., Koopman, M, dan Beijaard, D. (2013). Student teachers’ development of learning-focused conceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education Vol. 34, hlm. 26-37.
Terrel, S.R. (2012). Mixed-methods research methodologies. The Qualitative Report Vol. 17 No.1, hlm. 254-280.
Tsafos, V. (2009). Developing a practice-theory model in pre-service teacher education in Greece, The implication of action research. Action Research Vol. 8 No.2, hlm. 153-170.
Ulvik, M. (2014). Student-teachers doing action research in their practicum: why and how?. Educational Action Research Vol. 22 No. 4, hlm. 518-533.
Van Aalderen-Smeets, S.I., Van der Molen, J.H.W., dan Asma, L.J.F. (2011). Primary teachers’ attitudes toward science: A new theoritical framework. Science Education Vol. 96 No.1, hlm. 158-182.
Wang, H, Hall, N.C., dan Rahimi, S. (2015). Self-efficacy and causal attributions in teachers: Effects on burn out, job satisfaction, illness, and quitting intentions. Teaching and Teacher Education Vol., 47, hlm. 120-130.
Widodo, R., dan Riandi. (2013). Dual mode teacher professional development: chalenges and re-visioning future TPD in Indonesia. Teacher development Vol. 17 No.3, hlm. 380-392.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i2.36246
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching
All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616
Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)
View JPMIPA Stats