Email this article 
PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI BERBASIS METAKOGNITIF UNTUK MELATIHKAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR REFLEKTIF SISWA SMA
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan dan mengimplementasikan perangkat pembelajaran Biologi berbasis metakognitif. Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran menggunakan model 4-D, meliputi tahap pendefinisian (Definition), perancangan (Design), dan pengembangan (Develop), sedangkan tahap penyebaran (Disseminate) tidak dilakukan karena penelitian ini tergolong penelitian pengembangan. Penelitian dilakukan di salah satu Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) Negeri di Jawa Timur. Observasi, angket, dan tes digunakan untuk mengumpulkan variasi informasi selama implementasi perangkat pembelajaran. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perangkat pembelajaran ini valid, praktis, dan efektif untuk melatihkan keterampilan berpikir reflektif. Terdapat hambatan yang ditemui selama implementasi perangkat pembelajaran. Beberapa siswa bingung akan tugas dan strategi belajar baru, dan belum terbiasa mengoreksi dan mengakui kesalahan diri sendiri. Alternatif solusi yang diberikan dengan memberikan pengarahan dan informasi kepada siswa tentang pembelajaran menggunakan strategi metakognitif dengan harapan siswa lebih mudah dalam mengikuti pembelajaran, memberikan bimbingan untuk melatih keterampilan berpikir reflektif, dan membuat analogi yang mudah dipahami siswa.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this research was to develop and implement biology learning materials based on metacognitive strategy. The learning material was developed by using 4-D model, including the Definition, Design, Develop phase, whereas the Disseminate phase was not conducted because this research is classified as the development research. This research was conducted in one of the senior high schools in East Java. Validating, observing, and giving questionnaire were implemented to collect various information during implementation of the learning materials. The findings from this research showed that the learning materials are valid, practical, and effective in empowering students both in terms of attention and learning outcomes. There were several obstacles occurred during the implementation of the learning materials, i.e. students were confused of new task and learning strategy and were not accostumed in correcting and acknowledged their own mistakes. Alternative solutions were given by providing guidance and information to students about learning using metacognitive strategy, so that students were expected to follow the learning with ease, as well as to train their reflective thinking skill and using an analogy which easier to understand.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Acevedo, N. A. Van Dooren, W. Clarebout, G. Elen, J. and Verschaffel, L. (2010). “Representational flexibility in linear-function problems: a choice/no-choice study”. In L. Verschaffel, E. De Corte, T. de Jong and J. Elen (Eds.) Use or representations in reasoning and problem solving: Analysis and improvement, hlm. 74-79. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
Bao, L. Fang, K. Cai, T. Wang, J. Yang, L. Cui, L. Han, J. Ding, L. and Luo, Y. (2009). “Learning of content knowledge and development of scientific reasoning ability: A cross culture comparison”. American Journal Of Physics Vol.77 No.12, hlm.1118-1123.
Barakatu, A.R. (2007). Membangun Motivasi Berprestasi: Pengembangan Self Efficacy dan Penerapannya dalam Dunia Pendidikan. Lentera Pendidikan,Volume 10 No.1, hlm.34-51.
Biggs, A., Daniel, L., & Ortleb, E.. (1997). Life Science. Teacher Wraparound Edition. New York: Glencoe McGraw Hill.
Blakey, E dan S. Spence. (1990a). Metacognitive Behaviors, On line. (http://www.ncrel.org./sdrs/areas/issues/students/learning/Ir2behav.html, diakses tanggal 20 Maret 2015).
Blakey, E dan S. Spence, (1990b). Metacognitive Skill. On line. (http://education.calumet.perdue.edu/vockell/EdPsyBook/Edpsy7/edpsy7_meta.htm, diakses tanggal 20 Maret 2015).
Boud, D.K. dan Walker, R. (1996). Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. Kogen Page London.
Chee dan Pou. (2012). Reflective Thinking And Teaching Practices: A Precursor For
Incorporating Critical Thinking Into The Classroom?. International Journal of Instruction. Vol 5. No 1.
Corebima, A.D. (2006). Pengalaman Berupaya Menjadi Guru Profesional. Pidato Pengukuhan guru Besar Bidang Genetika. Malang: FMIPA Universitas Negeri Malang.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking and the educational process. New York: D.C Heath.
Doctor and Heller. (2009). Evaluating and Improving the Mathematics Teaching-Learning Process Through Metacognition. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, No. 13 Vol. 5.
Elsina, S. (2010). Pengaruh Evaluasi Diri Tentang Kemampuan Metakognitif dan Keterampilan Metakognitif Terhadap Berpikir Kritis dan Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah. Tesis. tidak dipublikasikan. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist Vol. 34, hlm.906-911.
Gronlund, N. E. and Linn, R. L. (1995). Measurement and assesment in teaching (7th ed). New Jersey: Merril Englewood Cliffs.
Gurol. A. (2011). Determining the reflective thinking skills of pre-service teachers in learning and teaching process. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies 2011 Volume 3 No. 3, hlm.387-402.
Hake, R. (1999). Analyzing Change Gain Scores. USA: Indiana University.
Hergenhahn, B. R. dan Olson, M. H. (2009). Theories of learning (teori belajar) edisi bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Ho, I dan Kelly, Y.L. (2010). Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking. Hongkong. Journal American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting Vol. 5, hlm.251-267.
In’am, A. (2012). A Metacognitive Approach to Solving Algebra Problems. Malang. International Journal of Independent Research and Studies Vol. 1 No.4, hlm.62-173.
Indana, S. (2009). Efektivitas Perangkat Pembelajaran Virus Dengan Strategi Metakognitif Terhadap Perolehan Kognitif Siswa SMA Kelas X. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA. Yogyakarta Fakultas MIPA Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Jiuan, T.Y. (2007). Amalan Pemikiran Reflektif dalam Kalangan Guru Matematis Sekolah Menengah. Tesis. Universitas Putra Malaysia.
Kemendikbud. (2013). Pendekatan ilmiah dalam Pembelajaran. Jakarta Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2013). PermendikbudNomor 81A/2013 Tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013, Lampiran IV.
Livingstone, J. A. (1997). Metacognition: An Overview. Online. (http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564/Metacog.htm, diakses tanggal 5 Oktober 2014).
Martinez, M. (2006). What is metacognition? Teacher intutyvely recognize the importance of metacognition but no be aware of itsmany dimensions. On line., diakses pada tanggal 26 Maret 2015.
Marzano, R.J. (1988). Dimensions of Thinking: A Framework for Curriculum and Instruction. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Mercer, N. Dawes, L. Wegerif, R. and Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British educational research journal. Vol.30 No.3, hlm. 359-377.
Mills, H.R. (1977). Teaching and Training. London: The Macmillan Press, Ltd.
Miranda, Y. (2010). “Dampak Pembelajaran Metakognitif dengan Strategi Kooperatif Terhadap Kemampuan Metakognitif Siswa dalam Mata Pelajaran Biologi di SMA Negeri Palangkaraya”. Jurnal Penelitian Kependidikan Vol. 20, hlm.2-10.
Mochtar, M. (2013). Hubungan Keterampilan Penyelesaian Masalah Terhadap Kecepatan Penyelesaian Masalah Siswa SMA. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
Moon, J. A. (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development: Theory and practice. London: Kogan Page.
Nelson, T.O. (1992). Metacognition. Core Readings. Boston: Allyn Bacon.
Nindiasari, H. (2011). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar dan Instrumen untuk Meningkatkan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Berbasis Pendekatan Metakognitif pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA). Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY, P-23.
Nur, M. (2005). Strategi-Strategi Belajar. Surabaya: UNESA-University Press.
Paidi. (2009). Model Pemecahan Masalah dalam Pembelajaran Biologi di SMA. Seminar Nasional Penelitian Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 1.
Phan, H.P. (2006). Examination of student learning approaches, reflective thinking, and epistemological beliefs: A latent variables approach. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, No. 10 Vol. 4 No. 3, hlm.557-610.
Purkey and Watson, Wilson. (1970). Self Concept and School Achievement. On line. (http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED058359/ERIC/ Self Concept and School Achievement.htm diakses tanggal 8 Mei 2012).
Ratumanan, G. T. dan Laurens. (2011). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Pada Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
Rustaman. N., R. Amini, Arifin, Mulyati, dan A. Munandar. (2005). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Sapa’at, A. (2008). “Kontribusi Asesmen Portofolio untuk Mengembangkan Aktivitas Refleksi Siswa.” Algoritma Vol. 3. No. 1.
Schon, D. (1987) Educating The Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Slavin, R. (2009). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. Boston: Allyn Bacon.
Solso, R. L. Maclin, O. H. and Maclin, M. K. (2008). Cognitive psychology. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Susantini, E. (2009a). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Biologi dengan Strategi Metakognitif untuk Memberdayakan Kecakapan Berpikir Siswa SMA. Laporan Penelitian Dikti Perpustakaan Universitas Indonesia.
Susantini, E. (2009b). The Development of Biology Material Resources by Metacognitive Strategy. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Vol. 16 No.2, hlm. 88-93.
Thiagarajan dan Semmel. (1947). Instructional Development for Training of Expectional Children a Sourcebook. Bloomington: Center for innovation on the teaching the handicapped.
Yasir, M. (2013). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa (LKS) Berbasis Metakognitif Untuk Meningkatkan Metacomprehension dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Skripsi. Tidak dipublikasikan. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Yasir, M. (2015). Relevansi Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Metakognitif Untuk Melatihkan Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains.
Yuliani, U. (2013). Kemandirian dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Biologi Bercirikan Metakognitif. Tesis. Tidak dipublikasikan. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i2.36240
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching
All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616
Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)
View JPMIPA Stats