DEVELOPMENT OF HYPOTHETICAL LEARNING TRAJECTORY FOR LINEAR EQUATIONS WITH PISA AND SCIENTIFIC APPROACH MODEL CONSIDERATION

Muda Apriyanti, Gede Suweken, I Nengah Suparta

Abstract


Prediction of how learning might proceed can be used as a basis for designing and achieving successful learning. A Hypothetical Learning Trajectory (HLT) consisted of learning goals, a set of learning activities, and a hypothesized learning process was developed for learning linear equations in which PISA and the scientific approach model also became points of consideration. HLT implementation in three learning schemes suggested the importance of scaffolding in learning linear equations. Sufficient and strategic scaffolding can improve student’s understanding and facilitate the students in overcoming obstacles when learning linear equations.

Keywords


hypothetical learning trajectory; linear equations; mathematics learning; scaffolding

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adu, E., Assuah, C.K., & Asiedu-Addo, S.K. (2015). Students’ errors in solving linear equation word problems: Case study of a Ghanaian senior high school. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 11, 17-30.

Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding Practices That Enhance Mathematics Learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 33-52.

Andrews-Larson, C., Wawro, M., & Zandieh, M. (2017). A hypothetical learning trajectory for conceptualizing matrices as linear transformations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(6), 809-829.

Bakker, A., Smit, J., & Wegerif, R. (2015). Scaffolding and dialogic teaching in mathematics education: introduction and review. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 1047–1065.

Beal, C. R., Qu, L., & Lee, H. (2008). Mathematics motivation and achievement as predictors of high school students’ guessing and help-seeking with instructional software. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 507–514.

Blanton, M., Brizuela, B.M., Gardiner, A.M., Sawrey, K., & Newman-Owens, A. (2015). A Learning Trajectory in 6-Year-Olds’ Thinking About Generalizing Functional Relationships. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(5), 511-558.

Birinci, D.K., Delice, A., & Aydin, E. (2014). University students’ solution processes in systems of linear equation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 563 – 568.

Caglayan, G., & Olive, J. (2010). Eighth grade students’ representations of linear equations based on a cups and tiles model. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74, 143–162.

Clements, D.H., Wilson, D.C., & Sarama, J. (2004). Young Children’s Composition of Geometric Shapes: A Learning Trajectories. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 163-184.

Clements, D., Sarama, J., Spitler, M., Lange, A., and Wolfe, C. B. (2011). Mathematics learned by young children in an intervention based on learning trajectories: A large-scale cluster randomized trial. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42, 127–166.

Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Baroody, A. J., Joswick, C., & Wolfe, C. B. (2019). Evaluating the Efficacy of a Learning Trajectory for Early Shape Composition. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2509-2530.

Cobb, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2008). Experimenting to Support and Understanding Learning Processes. In Kelly, A.E., Lesh, R.A., & Baek, J.Y. (Eds.), Handbook of Design Research Methods in Education: Innovation in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning and Teaching (pp. 68-95). Abingdon: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.

Ellis, A.B., Ozqur, Z., Kulow, T., Dogan, M.F., & Amidon, J. (2016). An Exponential Growth Learning Trajectory: Students’ Emerging Understanding of Exponential Growth Through Covariation. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(3),151-181.

Gravemeijer, K., Bowers, J., & Stephan, M. (2003). Chapter 4: A Hypothetical Learning Trajectory on Measurement and Flexible Arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education: Monograph, 12, 51-66.

Hewitt, D. (2012). Young students learning formal algebraic notation and solving linear equations: are commonly experienced difficulties avoidable? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81,139–159.

Huntley, M.A., Marcus, R., Kahan, J., & Miller, J.L. (2007). Investigating high-school students’ reasoning strategies when they solve linear equations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 115-139.

Ivars, P., Fernandez, C., Llinares, S., Choy, B.H. (2018). Enhancing Noticing: Using a Hypothetical Learning Trajectory to Improve Pre-service Primary Teachers’ Professional Dis-course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(11), 1-16.

Kusmaryono, I. (2018). Analysis of Students’ Incorrect Answers in a Mathematical Test: An Insight on Students’ Learning Based on SO-LO Taxonomy and Error Analysis. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 23(1), 1-8.

Lee, H.S. (2005). Facilitating Students’ Problem Solving in A Technological Context: Prospective Teachers’ learning Trajectory. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 223–254.

Minister of Education and Culture. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia No. 65 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Moschkovich, J. N. (2015). Scaffolding student participation in mathematical practices. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(7), 1067–1078.

OECD (2019), PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Sarama, J., Clements, D. H., Barrett, J., Van Dine, D. W., & McDonel, J. S. (2011). Evaluation of a learning trajectory for length in the early years. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(5), 667–680.

Simon, M.A. (1995). Reconstructing Mathematics Pedagogy From A Constructivist Perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-145.

Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the Role of Mathematical Tasks in Conceptual Learning: An Elaboration of the Hypothetical Learning Trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91–104.

Simon, M. (2014). Hypothetical Learning Trajectories in Mathematics Education. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 272–275.

Sztajn, P., Confrey, J., Wilson, P.H., & Edgington, C. (2012). Learning Trajectory Based Instruction: Toward a Theory of Teaching. Educational Researcher, 41(5), 147–156.

Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuzen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271–296.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v24i2.15856

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching 

All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616

Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

 

View JPMIPA Stats