EVALUATING WRITING LEARNING ASSESSMENT IN HIGH SCHOOL USING CONTEXT, INPUT, PROCESS, AND PRODUCT (CIPP) MODEL

Haris Santosa Nugraha, Syihabuddin Syihabuddin, Yeti Mulyati, Vismaia S. Damayanti

Abstract


Effective and efficient assessment of writing learning plays an important role in improving students' writing ability. Students' writing skills tend to be low so that they have not been able to achieve the expected learning objectives. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the implementation of high school students' writing learning assessment using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model. This evaluative method was conducted at high schools in the Bandung Raya area using purposive sampling technique. The research sample consisted of 120 students, 6 teachers, and 3 school leaders. Data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, and documentation which were analyzed using descriptive data analysis. The findings showed that the evaluation of the implementation of the assessment of learning to write on the average components of context, input, process, and product was in the good enough category with an average score of 2.91 and 2.87. The evaluation aspects analyzed include conditions, needs, teacher competencies, learner characteristics, availability of facilities and infrastructure, planning, implementation, implementation results, and the impact of the implementation of writing learning assessment in high school. Based on the findings of the analysis, improvement efforts are needed, especially in the component of writing learning assessment products that can be adapted to the diversity of students.

Keywords


CIPP Model; program evaluation; writing assessment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agusti, R., R, S., & Hakim, R. (2021). Peningkatan kemampuan menulis narasi berbasis pendekatan kontruktivisme di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(2), 930–942. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i2.820

Akbar, A., & Syamsurijal, S. (2023). Evaluation of online learning for PGSD study program students using the CIPP Model. Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities, 6(2), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v6i2.30163

Al-Mahrooqi, R., & Denman, C. (2018). Alternative Assessment. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0325

Ashari, H. (2020). Praktek Baik sebagai Alternative Penilaian Sikap dan Ketrampilan Saat BDR Dimasa Pandemi Covid 19. LPMP Lampung. http://lpmplampung.kemdikbud.go.id/detailpost/praktek-baik-sebagai-alternative-penilaian-sikap-dan-ketrampilan-saat-bdr-dimasa-pandemi-covid-19

Aspriyanti, L., Arbangi Nopi, R., & Luriawati Naryoatmojo, D. (2022). Evaluasi Program Kelas Menulis Puisi Menggunakan Model Evaluasi CIPP di Mts Negeri 1 Banjarnegara. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 2(3), 513–520. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v2i3.1914

Ati, A. P., Widiyarto, S., & Suyana, N. (2018). Penerapan metode picture and picture untuk peningkatan keterampilan menulis narasi pada siswa kelas VIII SMP Al Ihsan dan SMP Tashfia Kota Bekasi. Adimas : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(1), 30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24269/adi.v2i1.887

Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Pustaka Pelajar.

Chapman, C., & King, R. (2012). Differentiated assessment strategies: One tool doesn’t fit all (p. 199).

Damayanti, W. R., & Dwikurnaningsih, Y. (2020). Evaluasi program ekstrakurikuler di SDN Candirejo Kabupaten Semarang. Refleksi Edukatika : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 11(1), 59–69.

Heriyudanta, M. (2021). Analisis kompetensi menulis karya tulis ilmiah mahasiswa di Indonesia. ASCARYA, 1(1).

Kharizmi, M. (2019). Kesulitan siswa sekolah dasar dalam meningkatkan kemampuan literasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Almuslim, 7(2), 94–102.

Majuddin, C., Khambari, M. N. M., Wong, S. L., Ghazali, N., & Norowi, N. M. (2022). Students’ Perspectives on the Use of Differentiated Assessment Tool: Results from an Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Method Pilot Study. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11667

Menggo, S., & Gunas, T. (2022). College Student’s Perception of Performance-Based Assessment Use in Boosting Speaking Ability. International Journal of Language Education, 6(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i4.22910

Meyers, A. (2005). Gateways to Academic Writing: Effective Sentences Paragraph and Essay. Longman.

Muyasaroh, M., & Sutrisno, S. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Cipp Pada Program Pembelajaran Tahfiz Al-Qur’an Di Pondok Pesantren. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i2.2862

Nasri, N., Roslan, S. N., Sekuan, M. I., Bakar, K. A., & Puteh, S. N. (2010). Teachers’ perception on alternative assessment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.006

Nugraha, H. S., Mulyati, Y., & Damaianti, V. S. (2022). Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Kota Bandung pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 22(2).

Nur, M., & Rasyid, A. (2024). Evaluating indonesian language learning in indonesian islamic higher education using CIPP model. 17(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v17i1.56555

Nurgiantoro, B. (2013). Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa Berbasis Kompetensi. BPFE Yogyakarta.

Nurhayati. (2018). Upaya peningkatan keterampilan menulis teks prosedur kompleks menggunakan model penilaian autentik pada siswa kelas X TP Smk N 1 Bangkinang T.P 2017/2018. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 2, 500–509.

Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory into Practice, 48(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577536

Purwanto. (2011). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Pustaka Pelajar.

Putri, T., Roro Anggun Wijayanti, & Chairunisa. (2016). Effective Strategies For Improving writing Skills Of Elementary English. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 6, 128.

Qadaria, L., Rambe, K. B., Khairiah, W., Minta, R., Pulungan, I., Zahratunnisa, E., Fakultas, M., Tarbiyah, I., Keguruan, D., Sumatera, U., & Medan, U. (2023). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Keterampilan Menulis Belajar Siswa SD Kelas IV. Jurnal Bintang Pendidikan Indonesia (JUBPI), 1(3), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.55606/jubpi.v1i3.1675

Rachmaniar, R., Yahya, M., & Lamada, M. (2021). Evaluation of Learning through Work Practices Industry Program at University with the CIPP Model Approach. International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education, 3(2), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.55151/ijeedu.v3i2.55

Rebia, P. S., Suharno, Tamrin, A. G., & Akhyar, M. (2023). Evaluation of Product-Based Education Training Class at Vocational High School using the CIPP Model. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 12(3), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v12n3p135

Rosnaeni, R. (2021). Karakteristik dan asesmen pembelajaran abad 21. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 4341–4350. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1548

Sanusi, A., Maulana, D., & Sabarno, R. (2021). Evaluation of Students Writing Skills Using CIPP model in Arabic Learning: The Concept and its Implementation. The 4th Proceeding International Conference on Arabic Language and Literature (ICALL) 2021, 208–213. http://proceedings2.upi.edu/index.php/ical/article/view/1723%0Ahttp://proceedings2.upi.edu/index.php/ical/article/download/1723/1599

Sari, Y., Luvita, R. D., Cahyaningtyas, A. P., Iasha, V., & Setiawan, B. (2020). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Struktural Analitik Sitentik terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Permulaan di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(4), 1125–1133. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i4.515

Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan Penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173

Silviariza, W. Y., Sumarmi, Utaya, S., Bachri, S., & Handoyo, B. (2023). Development of Evaluation Instruments to Measure the Quality of Spatial Problem Based Learning (SPBL): CIPP Framework. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 413–436. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16223a

Simanjuntak, I. A., Akbar, S., & Mudiono, A. (2019). Asesmen Formatif Perkembangan Bahasa Anak. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(8), 1097. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i8.12686

Sofinatun, S., & Musringudin, M. (2022). Evaluasi program Baca Tulis dan Hafalan Qur’an (BTHQ) di SMP Muhammadiyah 30 dengan menggunakan model CIPP. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(1), 16237–16242.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2012). Systematic evaluation: A self-instructional guide to theory and practice. Springer Science & Business Media.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model (how to evaluate for improvement and accountability). The Guilford Press.

Stufflebeam, D.L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and appication. Josey-bass.

Stufflebeam, Daniel L. (2015). CIPP evaluation model checklist: A tool for applying the CIPP model to assess projects and programs. Journal of Western Michigan University, 5(1), 1–51. https://wmich.edu/evaluation/checklists

Sugiyarni, & Rini, S. (2023). Exploring writing assessment in EFL classroom. Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET), 7(1), 148–161.

Suharjo, S., & Zakir, S. (2021). Evaluasi program pendidikan inklusif di sekolah dasar menggunakan model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product). Sultra Educational Journal, 1(3), 51–59.

Suryadi, E., Milawasri, F. A., & Lustina, L. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Teks Prosedur Siswa. Jurnal Bindo Sastra, 6(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.32502/jbs.v6i1.3503

Trismanto. (2017). Keterampilan menulis dan permasalahannya. Bangun Rekaprima, 03(1), 62–67.

Utami, M. (2023). Teknik SMART sebagai Trik Pembelajaran Menulis Teks Cerita Inspiratif. NaikPangkat.Com. https://naikpangkat.com/teknik-smart-sebagai-trik-pembelajaran-menulis-teks-cerita-inspiratif/

Weda, D., Ariyanthi, N. K. M., & Adhikara, I. N. A. (2022). Analisis Kesalahan Berbahasa Dalam Karangan Deskripsi Pada Siswa Kelas V Sd Negeri 2 Siangan. SPHOTA: Jurnal Linguistik Dan Sastra, 14(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.36733/sphota.v14i1.2092

White, E. (2009). Are you assessment literate? Some fundamental questions regarding effective classroom-based assessment. OnCUE Journal, 3(1), 3–25.

Widiastuti, N. P. K., Putrayasa, I. B., & Adnyana, K. S. (2022). Instrumen Penilaian Keterampilan Menulis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pedagogi Dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v5i1.42473

Wijayanti, N. I., Yulianti, R., & Wijaya, B. (2019). Evaluasi program pendidikan pemakai dengan model CIPP di perpustakaan Fakultas Teknik UGM. Tik Ilmeu: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 3(1), 37.

Wijayanti, Nova Indah, Yulianti, R., & Wijaya, B. (2019). Evaluasi programm pendidikan pemakai dengan Model CIPP di Perpustakaan Fakultas Teknik UGM. Tik Ilmeu : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 3(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.29240/tik.v3i1.790

Yogyantoro, A. (2016). Peningkatan Keterampilan Menulis Karangan Deskripsi Menggunakan Media Diorama Siswa Kelas Iv Essays Description Writing Skills Improvement Using Media Diorama At Class Iv. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1–10. http://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/pgsd/article/viewFile/5378/5085

Yusrumaida, Y. (2021). Penerapan Teknik Mind Maps dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis Siswa. Journal of Education Action Research, 5(4), 472. https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v5i4.12345

Zainab, I., Jaya, G. B., & Artini, L. P. (2021). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis Peserta Didik Melalui Whatsapp Diary Writing. Indonesian Gender and Society Journal, 1(2), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.23887/igsj.v1i2.39082




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v17i2.65546

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Haris Santosa Nugraha, Syihabuddin Syihabuddin, Yeti Mulyati, Vismaia S. Damayanti



Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.