PENGUKURAN PRAKTIK DASAR LISTRIK MENGGUNAKAN IMPORTANCE–PERFORMANCE (IP) ANALYSIS

Elih Mulyana

Abstract


Practical ability with the expected results is the main issue to improve the practical learning process. This study aims to measure student achievement in basic practical work of electrical engineering. The assessment of basic practical work was analyzed by calculating gaps using Importance-performance (IP) analysis. Implicitly each attribute is included in the quadrant model of the 2nd order structural equation IP-analysis, then the mapping results of each parameter are analyzed as follows quadrant A: Top priority; quadrant B: maintain good work; quadrant C: low priority; quadrant A: excessive priority. The results showed that student performance was reached as expected, for aspects of the achievement of reading images, selecting components, installing components and over-priority, measuring the results of practice and interpreting the measurement results.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alias, M. 2005. Assessment of Learning

Outcomes: Validity and Reliability of

classroom Tests. World Transaction on

Engineering and Technology Education.

-238.

Alinier, G. and Alinier, N., 2006. Design

of an objective assessment tool to evaluate

students' basic electrical engineering skills:

the OSTE. Journal for the Enhancement of

Learning and Teaching.

Black, P. and Wiliam, D., 2006.

Assessment for learning in the

classroom. Assessment and learning, pp.9-

Brown, S. and Pickford, R., 2006.

Assessing skills and practice. Routledge.

Ferris, T.L. and Aziz, S., 2005. A

psychomotor skills extension to Bloom's

taxonomy of education objectives for

engineering education (Doctoral

dissertation, National Cheng Kung

University Tainan).

Hunter, C., Mccosh, R. & Wilkins, H.

Integrating Learning and

Assessment in Laboratory Work.

Chemistry Education: Research and

Practice, 4, 67-75.

Martilla, J.A. and James, J.C., 1977.

Importance-performance analysis. The

journal of marketing, pp.77-79.

Mathew, S. S. & Earnest, J. 2004.

Laboratory-based innovative approaches

for competence development. Global

Journal of Engineering Education, 8, 167-

Salim, K.R., Puteh, M. and Daud, S.M.,

Assessing students’ practical skills

in basic electronic laboratory based on

psychomotor domain model. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 56,

pp.546-555.

Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., &

Macpherson, K. A. 1999. Learning by

Doing. In C. M. Reigeluth (Eds),

Instructional-design Theories and Model:

A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory,

, 161-175. Mahwah, New Jersey:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Watai, L., Brodersen, A. J. & Brophy, S.

Designing Effective Laoratory

Courses in Electrical Engineering:

Challenged-based Model that Reflects

Engineering Process. ASEE/IEEE

Frontiers in Education Conference.

October 10-13. Milwaukee.

Zaghloul, A. 2001. Assessment of lab

work: A Three-Domain Model; cognitive,

affective and psychomotor. ASEE Annual

Conference & Exposition. June 24-27,

Albuquerque.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.