EVALUATION INSTRUMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING PROGRAM IN THE CULTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN INDONESIA

Atie Setiawati, Uman Suherman A.S, Nandang Rusmana

Abstract


Program evaluation in comprehensive guidance and counseling is very important to determine the level of goal achievement. For the evaluation results to provide the right information, a valid and reliable instrument is needed. At the higher education level, the comprehensive guidance and counseling program, including the program evaluation component, does not have many references that users can refer to. The available references focus more on primary and secondary education levels. This research is intended to produce the intended evaluation instrument. Descriptive methods and literature reviews were used in this study. The data were revealed using a Delphi technique questionnaire involving three experts, then analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. In this study, the constructs of evaluation instruments for comprehensive guidance and counseling programs were synthesized and modified from various expert opinions and professional organizations with two patterns of answers: yes and no. The resulting evaluation instrument needs to be empirically tested for its feasibility by involving adequate participants.

Keywords


guidance and counseling program, evaluation, higher education institutions.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anastasi, A. & Urbina, S. (2003). Tes Psikologi (terjemahan Robertus Hariono, S. Imam). Jakarta: PT. Indeks Gramedi Group

Anderson, dkk. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. US: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

ASCA. (2005). The ASCA National Model : A Framework for School Counseling Programs. 2nd. Ed. Alexandria, VA: ASCA.

Bowers, J. L. & Hatch, P. A. (2000). The National Model for School Counseling Programs. American School Counselor Association

Dirjen Dikti. (2012). Sertifikasi Guru Dalam Jabatan, Buku IV Rambu-Rambu Pelaksanaan Pendidikan dan Latihan Profesi Guru (PLPG). Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti Kemdikbud.

Gibson, L. & Mitchell. (1981). Introduction Guidance. New York: Macmillan Publishing

Gizbers, N.C. & Henderson, P. (2006). Developing & Managing Your School Gudance and Counseling Program (4th ed.). Alexandria, VA: American School Counseling Asociation

Gronlund, N.E. (1985). Measurement and Evaluation In Teaching. Fifth Edition. New York: Mc Millan Publishing Co.,Inc.

Hadisubroto, S. (1984). Analisis terhadap Kecocokan APM bagi Siswa-siswa Kelas I SMA Dikaitkan dengan Beberapa Faktor yang Melatarbelakangi Kehidupannya. Disertasi. Bandung: Sekolah Pasca Sarjana IKIP Bandung.Tidak diterbitkan

Kemdikbud. (2016). Panduan Operasional Penyelenggaraan Bimbingan dan Konseling Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA). Jakarta: Dirjen GTK.

Government regulation of the Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number 111 of 2014 concerning Guidance and Counseling in Basic Education and Secondary Education.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. [Online]. Diakses dari https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED062385.

Suherman, U. (2019). Manajemen Bimbingan dan Konseling. Bandung: Rizki Press.

Suryabrata, S. (1998). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada

Yusuf, S. & Sugandhi, N. M. (2020). Bimbingan dan Konseling di Perguruan Tinggi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jomsign.v5i2.36984

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 JOMSIGN: Journal of Multicultural Studies in Guidance and Counseling

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats