PERENCANAAN, PELAKSANAAN, EVALUASI, DAN PENERAPAN YANG EFEKTIF PADA PENDIDIKAN DAN PELATIHAN JABATAN FUNGSIONAL AUDITOR

Api Achmad Rochjadi

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui, mendeskripsikan, menganalisis, memaknai, dan menafsirkan efektivitas penyelenggaraan Diklat Jabatan Fungsional Auditor (JFA) yang meliputi perencanaan, pelaksanaan, evaluasi program, penerapan hasil diklat, dan diakhiri dengan memberikan rekomendasi penyelenggaraan Diklat JFA yang efektif. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data berupa metode wawancara, observasi, dan studi dokumentasi. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa Diklat JFA kurang efektif disebabkan dalam merencanakan Diklat JFA belum dilakukan analisis kebutuhan secara komprehensif. Dalam merancang sasaran diklat belum spesifik, sulit diukur, dan belum ada kurun waktu. Pengembangan kurikulum, materi diklat, dan panduan diklat belum disesuaikan dengan tuntutan kebutuhan pengguna. Alat bantu pembelajaran kurang berfungsi dengan baik. Pemilihan widyaiswara belum dilakukan sesuai kompetensinya, serta tidak pernah dilakukan seleksi peserta. Dalam pelaksanaan diklat, widyaiswara kurang kreatif menarik minat peserta, dan metode pembelajaran kurang variatif. Evaluasi terhadap peserta diklat belum dilakukan. Berkaitan dengan penerapan hasil diklat, rancangan transfer pembelajaran belum dibuat, beberapa hasil diklat belum diterapkan dalam pekerjaan, serta belum ada indikator kinerja auditor. 

The purpose of this study is to determine, describe, analyze, and interpret the effectiveness of education and training arrangement for Auditor Functional Position, which includes planning, implementation, evaluation of the training program, transfer of training, and the conclusion by providing recommendation how to arrange Education and Training for Auditor Functional Position effectively. The research used a qualitative approach through interview, observation, and documentary study methods. The results of research showed conclusions that Diklat JFA is less effective because training needs analysis has not been done comprehensively yet. In designing the training objectives, has not been specific, difficult to measure, and has not had time period. Curriculum development, training material, and training guidance have not been adjusted with the demands of the users needs. Some learning tools were less functioned. Trainers has not been selected as their competencies, and participants selection was not been done. In implementing training, some trainers were less creativity to attract participants attention, and learning methods had less variety. Evaluation to training participants have not been done. According to training results application, training transfer design has not been made, some training results have not been able to implemented in workplace, and there have not been auditor performance indicators yet.

 


Keywords


Perencanaan, pelaksanaan Diklat, penerapan hasil, evaluasi, efektivitas. planning, training implementation, result application, evaluation, effectiveness.

References


Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan RI (2014). Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester II Tahun 2013: Buku I Ringkasan Eksekutif. Jakarta: BPK-RI.

Barbazette, Jean (2006). Training Needs Assessment: Methods, Tools, and Techniques. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

Cruse, Kevin (2012). Evaluating e-Learning: Introduction to the Kirkpatrick Model. http://www.e-learningguru.com/articles/ art2_8.htm.

Davies, Eddie (2005). The Training Manager’s a Handbook. Jakarta: PT Bhuana Ilmu Populer.

Detty, Regina, dkk (2009). Evaluasi Efektivitas Program Pelatihan “Know Your Customer and Money Laundering” di Bank XYZ Bandung. Journal of Management and Business Review, Vol. VI, pg. 20-34.

Fauzi, Ikka Kartika A. (2011). Mengelola Pelatihan Partisipatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Griffin, Ricky W. (2013). Management. 11th Edition. Ohio: South-Western, Cengage Learning.

Grossman, Rebecca and Eduardo Salas (2011). The Transfer of Training: What Really Matters? International Journal of Training and Development 15:2. Florida: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Hamalik, Oemar. (2007). Manajemen Pelatihan Ketenagakerjaan Pendekatan Terpadu Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Hamalik, Oemar. (2010). Manajemen Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Laporan Keuangan oleh Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP) yang tertuang dalam Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester II Tahun 2013

Mulyasa, H.E. (2006). Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Noe, Raymond A. (2009). Employee Training and Development. Fifth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Peraturan Kepala BPKP Nomor: PER-1633/K/JF/2011. Pedoman Teknis Peningkatan Kapabilitas APIP. Jakarta: BPKP.

Prawiradilaga, Dewi Salma (2008). Prinsip Desain Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana. www.stiab.net.

Pusat Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Pengawasan BPKP (2014). Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Pusdiklatwas BPKP Tahun 2013. Nomor LAP-120/DL/2/2014, tanggal 21 Januari 2014.

Rae, Leslie (2005). Using Training Aids in Training and Development: A Practical Guide for Trainers and Presenters. Jakarta: PT Bhuana Ilmu Populer.

Werner, J.M. and Randy L. De Simone (2006). Human Resources Development. USA: Thomson




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v21i1.6668

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan



ISSN: p.1412-8152 e.2580-1007
Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan is issued by Program Studi Administrasi Pendidikan Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
free
hit counter
View My Stats