MANAGEMENT FOR IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LECTURER IN RESEARCH AT UNIVERSITIES

Nayyif Sujudi, Mohammad Fakry Gaffar, Aan Komariah, Dedy Achmad Kurniady

Abstract


This study is focused on examining the management of improving the quality of lecturers in research at universities. The research method used is descriptive qualitative in Private Universities in Bandung involving respondents from university leaders, the Directorate of PPM, deans, study programs and lecturers. The results of the research show that the implemented policy becomes an element of determination in managerial aspects of safety in terms of success targets, research evaluation, and research. In the aspect of personal management, research development is carried out for lecturers capable of making proposals, attending scientific forums nationally and internationally and providing research incentives and scientific publications. While in the managerial aspects of society, the improvement of the quality of lecturers in research is designed as a form of contribution to solving problems in the community which is an emphasis on improving the ability of lecturers to conduct research.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Amstrong, M. (2010). Human Resource Management. Kogan Page Limited.

Aydin, O. T. (2017). Research performance of higher education institutions: a review on the measurements and affecting factors of research performance. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 7(2), 312. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2017.210

Ben Zaied, R. M., Louati, H., & Affes, H. (2015). The Relationship Between Organizational Innovations, Internal Sources of Knowledge and Organizational Performance. International Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains, 6(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijmvsc.2015.6105

Blackburn, T. (2012). Faculty rank system, motivation, and faculty research productivity. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(1), 2–22. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2943901?uid=3739864&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21101119901727

Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810204142

Brew, A. (2003). Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436032000056571

Colbeck, C. (2008). Faculty Engagement in Public Scholarship: A Motivation Systems Theory Perspective. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 12(2), 7–32.

Creswell, J. W. (1985). Faculty Research Performance: Lessons from the Sciences and the Social Sciences. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, 1985. Association for the Study of Higher Education, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Department PR-4,.

Damayanti, S., & Rakhmawati, T. (2016). PERUMUSAN KERANGKA SASARAN MUTU PENELITI DAN KELOMPOK PENELITIAN DALAM RANGKA PENERAPAN ISO 9001 DI PUSAT PENELITIAN X. Prosiding PPI Standardisasi 2015 – Jakarta, 10 November 2015 PERUMUSAN, November 2015.

Darmalaksana, W. (2017). ANALISIS KULTUR PENELITIAN DAN PUBLIKASI UIN SUNAN GUNUNG DJATI BANDUNG Wahyudin Darmalaksana. Jurnal Informasi Riset Dan Inovasi, 1–13.

Edy, S. (2017). Dampak kinerja dosen dengan adanya program peningkatan mutu serta motivasi kerja di stie amkop makassar. Ilmiah Aksi STIE AMKOP, 4(1).

Gaffar, M. F. (2012). Dinamika Pendidikan Nasional, Isu, Tantangan dan Perspektif Masa Depan. Univesitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Garde-Hansen, J., & Calvert, B. (2007). Developing a research culture in the undergraduate curriculum. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787407077984

H. Djaman Satori, A. S. (2013). PENINGKATAN KUALITAS KERJA MELALUI POLA PEMBINAAN (CAPACITY BUILDING) DOSEN MUDA PADA PROGRAM STUDI ADMINISTRASI PENDIDIKAN SPs UPI. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 13(1).

Hedjazi, Y., & Behravan, J. (2011). Study of factors influencing research productivity of agriculture faculty members in Iran. Higher Education, 62(5), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9410-6

Hemmings, B., & Kay, R. (2008). Lecturer self-efficacy, research skills, and publication output. Paper the AARE Annual Conference Brisbane.

Hidayat, S. (2018). PENINGKATAN MUTU PENELITIAN DI INDONESIA DALAM MENGATASI MASALAH PENDIDIKAN. Bioilmi, 4(2), 34–44.

Horta, H. (2009). Holding a post-doctoral position before becoming a faculty member: Does it bring benefits for the scholarly enterprise? Higher Education, 58(5), 689–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9221-1

Jung, J. (2012). Faculty Research Productivity in Hong Kong across Academic Discipline. Higher Education Studies, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v2n4p1

Keith, B., Layne, J. S., Babchuk, N., & Johnson, K. (2002). The Context of Scientific Achievement: Sex Status, Organizational Environments, and the Timing of Publication on Scholarship Outcomes. Social Forces, 80(4), 1253–1281. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2002.0029

Kim, K.-H. (2014). Determinants of Research Productivity: A Korean Case. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 3(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2014.3.2.193

Kotrlik, J. W., Bartlett, II, J. E., Higgins, C. C., & Williams, H. A. (2002). Factors Associated With Research Productivity Of Agricultural Education Faculty. Journal of Agricultural Education, 43(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2002.03001

Masluyah, S. (2008). Kebijakan dan Pengembangan Mutu Dosen.

Perry, J. L. (2010). A strategic agenda for public human resource management research. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 30(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X09351821

Price, J., & Cotten, S. R. (2005). Expectations of Assistant Professors.

Retnowati, Trie Hartiti, D. M. & B. K. (2018). KINERJA DOSEN DI BIDANG PENELITIAN DAN PUBLIKASI ILMIAH. Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-4623.2018.01.

Rubiono, G., & Finahari, N. (2017). Dosen: Profil-profil Sederhana dalam Profesi yang Rumit. JAS-PT Jurnal Analisis Sistem Pendidikan Tinggi, 1(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.36339/jaspt.v1i1.35

Setiyo, M., Waluyo, B., Saifudin, ., Purnomo, B. C., Munahar, S., Widodo, N., & Rusdjijati, R. (2018). Evaluasi Ketercapaian Standar Penjaminan Mutu Penelitian Di Program Studi D3 Mesin Otomotif Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang Dengan Metode Indeks. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 4(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v4i1.397

Shin, J. C., & Cummings, W. K. (2010). Multilevel analysis of academic publishing across disciplines: Research preference, collaboration, and time on research. Scientometrics, 85(2), 581–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0236-2

Strauss, A., dan J. C. (2003). Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Kualitatif. Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar.

Surya, D. E. (2006). Kompetensi dosen terhadap standarisasi layanan kepada mahasiswa. Majalah Ilmiah UNIKOM, 6(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0803414

Wills, D., Ridley, G., & Mitev, H. (2013). Research productivity of accounting academics in changing and challenging times. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 9(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/18325911311307186

Yudithia Dian Putra. (2015). Dosen Indonesia V Dosen Swedia : Pengembangan Dosen Untuk. Eksekutif, 12(2), 381–389.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v27i2.24695

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan



ISSN: p.1412-8152 e.2580-1007
Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan is issued by Program Studi Administrasi Pendidikan Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
free hit counter
View My Stats