Analysis of Adolescent Creative Thinking Skills Scale Based on Creative Personality Perspective

Anne Hafina, Qawiyyan Fitri

Abstract


The continuous development of the world demands skill abilities in its human resources both in educational, economic, and artistic jurisdictions. Creative thinking skills are one of the important skills to have and develop to survive and compete in the 21st century. Creative thinking skills are known as the ability to understand gaps or obstacles in life, the ability to adapt creatively, and the ability to solve problems creatively needed in the 21st century. The purpose of this paper is to develop a tool for assessing youth's creative thinking skills which are used to measure the creative attitudes of high school-aged youth. Based on the analysis of the relevant literature, this study developed 48 items that were intended to reflect the creative thinking skills of adolescents based on a creative personality perspective. The samples taken were 135 adolescents aged 15-20 years in the city of Bandung. Item validity and scale reliability were measured using the Rasch modeling. The results showed that 1) the Cronbach Alpha score was 0.88 in the very good category, 2) the item reliability coefficient was 1.00 in the special category, and 3) the person reliability coefficient was 0.87 in the good category, which means that adolescents respond consistently to each item. Based on the results of the Rasch modeling analysis, this paper maintains 46 valid items while 2 other items are invalid.

Keywords


Adolescence; Creative personality; Creative thingking skills; Instrumental scale

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustin, E. W. (2019). Development of curriculum 2013 as an effort to improve the quality of education in Indonesia. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 326(1), 178-182.

Amanda, L., Yanuar, F., and Devianto, D. (2019). Uji Validitas dan reliabilitas tingkat partisipasi politik masyarakat kota Padang. Jurnal Matematika Universitas Andalas, 8(1), 179-188.

Andriopoulos, C. (2003). Six paradoxes in managing creativity: An embracing act. Long Range Planning, 36(4), 375-388.

Cook, D. A., and Beckman, T. J. (2006). Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. The American Journal of Medicine, 119(2), 166e7-166e17.

Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 113-127.

Dirlanudin, D. (2006). Pengembangan bakat kreativitas anak. Jurnal Teknodik, 10(19), 174-187.

Djollong, A. F. (2014). Tehnik pelaksanaan penelitian kuantitatif. Istiqra: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Islam, 2(1), 1-15.

Grainger, P., Steffler, R., de Villiers Scheepers, M. J., Thiele, C., and Dole, S. (2019). Student negotiated learning, student agency and general capabilities in the 21st century: The deLorean project. The Australian Educational Researcher, 46 (3), 425-447.

Hasanah, A., Ilyas, A., and Afdal, A. (2018). Kreativitas siswa dan upaya guru bimbingan dan konseling/konselor dalam pengembangannya. Insight: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 7(1), 1-8.

Holis, A. (2017). Peranan keluarga/orang tua dan sekolah dalam mengembangkan kreativitas anak usia dini. Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Gajayana, 1(1), 22-43.

Karwowski, M., and Jankowska, D. M. (2016). Four faces of creativity at school. Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom, 1(1) 337-354.

Khamis, M. R., Abdullah, N., and Noranee, S. (2016). Does government incentive influence compliance behavior of business zakat among owners of SMES? An evidence via rasch measurement model. Advances in Business Research International Journal, 2(2), 1-16.

Kurniawan, B., Rahayu, R., Gita, R. R., Syahrani, Z. L., and Anugrah, Z. (2022). Pengaruh konseling behavioral terapi terhadap budaya Indonesia Timur. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7(5), 6138-6148.

Nisa, R. M. (2018). Kreativitas dalam psikologi humanistik dan implikasinya dalam pendidikan. Hikmah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(2), 259-280.

Qorib, M., Parjuangan, C. K. J., and Jaya, C. K. (2022). Kreativitas dalam perspektif teori humanistik rogers. Intiqad: Jurnal Agama dan Pendidikan Islam, 14(1), 159-176.

Setiawati, W. (2019). Increasing creativity of early childhood through origami playing activities. Jurnal Empowerment, 8(1), 81-89.

Siswono, T. Y. E. (2016). Berpikir kritis dan berpikir kreatif sebagai fokus pembelajaran matematika. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 11-26.

Susanto, E., Novitasari, Y., and Yusuf, S. (2018). Development of creative personality inventory (CPI): Hypothetical concept. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 4(2), 176-192.

Widiana, H., Mukhidin, M., and Astuti, W. P. (2017). The contribution of internet utilization and learning creativity on KKPI subjects in SMK negeri 2 Bandung. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 102(1), 286-294.

Yusri, F. (2017). Meningkatkan kreativitas untuk menaklukkan persaingan ketat di pasar bebas. Proceeding Institut Agama Islam Negeri Batusangkar, 1(1), 106-118.

Zakiah, N. E., Fatimah, A. T., and Sunaryo, Y. (2020). Implementasi project-based learning untuk mengeksplorasi kreativitas dan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis mahasiswa. Teorema: Teori dan Riset Matematika, 5(2), 285-293.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijomr.v2i2.60056

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Kantor Jurnal dan Publikasi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Research (IJOMR) is published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)