Analysis of selected political Malaysiakini news visuals: A discursive news value and visual semiotics approach
Abstract
This research examines the newsworthiness and ideological values embedded in political visuals, particularly those depicting leaders and politicians, as published by Malaysiakini, a leading Malaysian online news platform. Using a qualitative content analysis approach, the study is informed by Bednarek and Caple’s (2017) framework on discursive news values and Kress and van Leeuwen’s (1996) visual semiotics. It analyzed 12 political visuals published on Malaysiakini between April and October 2021. The analysis focuses on how these visuals align with three key newsworthiness values: eliteness, negativity, and positivity. The findings reveal that Malaysiakini often combines eliteness with either negativity or positivity, with eliteness serving as the dominant framing element for political figures. These visual representations reflect Malaysiakini’s editorial stance and ideological priorities, shaping how political leaders and issues are presented. Furthermore, the analysis highlights how political visuals function as ideological tools, embedding implicit meanings that align with the platform’s editorial identity and influencing audience perceptions. This study underscores the significant role visuals play in constructing and conveying ideologies. By portraying political figures and events in specific ways, Malaysiakini reinforces dominant political narratives, influencing public understanding of key issues. The research contributes to visual news analysis by demonstrating how media visuals can frame political discourse and shape ideological perspectives. Additionally, it offers insights into how Malaysian media organizations strategically use visual content to engage audiences and communicate editorial priorities.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmad, A., Akmar, G., Akmar, G., Zawawi, J. W. M., & Yaakup, H. S. (2022). A closer look at 1MDB framing in Malaysian mainstream English newspapers before and after GE-14. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(13), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i13/14598
Aiello, G., Thurlow, C., & Portmann, L. (2023). Desocializing social media: The visual and media ideologies of stock photography. Social Media + Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231156363
Baharin, M. I., Waheed, M., Ghazali, A. H. A., & Ahmad, A. M. T. (2020). Framing analysis of Malaysia’s media outlets and editorial decisions concerning frame preferences after the 2008 GENERAL ELECTION. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 28(2), 1311-1334. http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/pjssh/browse/regular-issue?article=JSSH-5081-2019
Barnhurst, K. G., & Nerone, J. (2001). The form of news: A history. Guilford Press.
Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2012). News discourse. Continuum.
Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2017). The discourse of news value: How news organizations create newsworthiness. Oxford University Press.
Billard, T. J., & Moran, E. R. (2022). Designing trust: Design style, political ideology, and trust in “fake” news websites. Digital Journalism,1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2087098
Bock, M. A. (2020). Theorizing visual framing: Contingency, materiality and ideology. Visual Studies, 35(1),1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2020.1715244
Bucy, E., & Joo, J. (2021). Editors’ introduction: Visual politics, grand collaborative programs, and the opportunity to think big. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220970361
Esfandiari, M., Fridrich, B., & Yao, J. (2021). The visual content of Twitter during the 2018 protests in Iran: Analysis of its role and function. Global Media and Communication, 17(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665211002228
Fathir, M, F., M, Lokman, M., A, Kadir, A.., & Sualman, I. (2023). Social media usage and interactions: An in-depth interview on BERSIH 2.0 social media visual framing. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 38(2), 127-143.
https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2022-3802-08
Ha, T. T. X. (2024). The interconnection between systemic functional language and the grammar of visual design in the context of advertising language. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajhss.2024.v06i01.001
Hao, X., Wu, B., Morrison, A. M., & Wang, F. (2016). Worth thousands of words? Visual content analysis and photo interpretation of an outdoor tourism spectacular performance in Yangshuo-Guilin, China. Tourism Culture & Communication, 27(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2015.1082921
Huang, X., Li, X., & Yao, J. (2023). Investigating the role of visual storytelling in enhancing audience engagement in digital journalism. MEDAAD, 2023, 10-17. https://doi.org/10.70470/MEDAAD/2023/002
Ismail, H., Khoo, S., Idrus, M. M., Cheong, J. P. G., & Razman, R. (2022). Newspaper coverage of paralympic athletes: A multimodal discourse analysis. Sage Open, 12(2), 21582440221102434.
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221102434
Kim, J. W., Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2021). The distorting prism of social media: How self-selection and exposure to incivility fuel online comment toxicity. Journal of Communication, 71(6), 922–946. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab034
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.
Lagopoulos, A. P., & Boklund-Lagopoulou, K. (2024). Chapter 1: Approaches to the semiotics of images: The object of study. In Semiotics of images (pp. 1–24). DeGruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110980257-002
Lester, P. M. (2006). Visual Communication: Images with Messages, (4th ed.) California: Wadsworth.
Levy, R. E. (2021). Social media, news consumption, and polarization: Evidence from a field experiment. American Economic Review, 111(3), 831-870. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191777
Li, Y., & Xie, Y. (2020). Is a picture worth a thousand words? An empirical study of image content and social media engagement. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243719881113
Liang, L., & Tiung, L. K. (2024). Framing in Malaysia’s multicultural electoral landscape: Governance, economic challenges, and social justice. Journal of Political Communication and Media Studies, 14(6), 1144–1163. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i6/21705
Liu, Y., & Cheng, L. (2021). Semiotics in visual communication: Review of Doing Visual Analysis. Semiotica, 2021(242),241–247. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2021-0024
Malaysiakini. (2021, April 10). PH buka 'khemah besar' untuk semua kecuali kleptokrat. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/570186
Malaysiakini. (2021, April 27). Dana RM5b: Dua bekas menteri kewangan bidas Zafrul. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/572445
Malaysiakini. (2021, June 13). Zafrul nafi kempen bendera putih petanda negara nak gagal. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/582884
Malaysiakini. (2021, June 22). ‘14 hari buka parlimen cadangan biro politik, bukan MT Umno’. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/579959
Malaysiakini. (2021, June 24). Zahid kalau pemilihan Umno dia buat-buat tak dengar – Nazri. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/580274
Malaysiakini. (2021, July 4). Kes lompat parti: Azmin 'disindir' rakan menteri PN, Maximus. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/581680
Malaysiakini. (2021, July 8). 'Muhyiddin hilang majoriti, tapi AG bertindak seperti ahli politik'. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/582281
Malaysiakini. (2021, July 29). 'Muhyiddin derhaka, langgar sumpah taat setia Agong'. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/585084
Malaysiakini. (2021, September 30). Pembebasan Ahmad Maslan 'amalan dua darjat' – MP. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/593498
Malaysiakini. (2021, October 20). Kalau tak hormat janji jadi ‘negara paria’, kata Mahathir. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/596108
Malaysiakini. (2021, October 1). Zahid: Umno akan pertahan semua kerusi dimenangi PRU14. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/593633
Malaysiakini. (2021, October 17). K'jaan bertanggungjawab siasat isu Kertas Pandora, cegah salah guna kewangan luar pesisir. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/595782
Nasser, M. K. (1983). News values and ideology: A third world perspective. Longman Incorporation.
Othman, S. (2018). Di sebalik tabir bilik berita akhbar [Behind the scenes of the newspaper newsroom]. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Pratama, D. C. (2019). Retorika visual dalam karikatur politik: Analisis retorika visual sampul majalah Tempo [Visual rhetoric in political caricature: A visual rhetorical analysis of Tempo magazine covers]. Bachelor’s thesis, Universiti Brawijaya.
Pérez-Montoro, M. (2020). Visual rhetoric in digital news: The role of images in political communication. Digital Journalism, 8(2), 134–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1778935
Salamon, E. (2023). Communicative labor resistance practices: Organizing digital news media unions and precarious work. Communication Theory, 33(4), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtac023
Senawi, B. J. (2014). Ideologies underlying the use of photographs in newspaper coverage of BERSIH 3.0 rally: A social semiotic analysis. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 30(2), 41–60. https://ejournal.ukm.my/mjc/article/view/14976/7453
van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
Wang, N. (2024). Analysis of visual images using the social semiotic. Communications in Humanities Research, 34(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/34/20240106
Zulli, D., Liu, M., & Gehl, R. (2020). Rethinking the “social” in “social media”: Insights into topology, abstraction, and scale on the Mastodon social network. New Media & Society, 22(7), 1188–1205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820912533
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i3.67058
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.