How Accountability is Practiced in HKBP Church: An Empirical Evidence in Indonesia

Denny Andriana, Joe Putra Pratama Pardede, R. Nelly Nur Apandi

Abstract


Prior studies report that accountability practice in a place of worship, i.e., church, is more to practicing sincerity and faith to God than to provide documents and transaction evidence. However, recent findings indicate that there is an increased fraud and embezzlement in churches. Using a stewardship theory, this study aims to explore the practice of accountability and transparency of a church’s financial activities from the perspective of its management and congregations. A HKBP church in Bandung, Indonesia, is chosen as the case study. A qualitative method is used in this study. The data obtained is through interviews, documentation, and observation. Key informants who participated in the interviews were the head of congregations, the treasurer and the treasury assembly staff. Also, three congregations were selected using purposive sampling to participate in responding to the questions. The findings show that the practice of accountability in the HKBP church is perceived good by its members. The involvement of congregations in decision making process in the church makes them satisfied with how the church is managed.


Keywords


accountability; stewardship theory; church; fraud

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akpanuko, E. E., & Asogwa, I. E. (2013). Accountability: A Synthesis. International Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(3), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijfa.20130203.04

Athifah, A., Bayinah, A. N., & Bahri, E. S. (2018). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Publik dan Transparansi Laporan Keuangan Terhadap Kepercayaan Donatur pada Yayasan PPPA Daarul Qur’an Nusantara. Perisai : Islamic Banking and Finance Journal, 2(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.21070/perisai.v2i1.1496

Blandford, A. (2013). Semi-structured qualitative studies. In R. F. S. Mads and Dam (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed. The Interaction Design Foundation.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Day, P., & Klein, R. (1987). Accountabilities: Five Public Services. Tavistock Publications.

Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103

Grossi, G., & Thomasson, A. (2015). Bridging the accountability gap in hybrid organizations: the case of Copenhagen Malmö Port. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(3), 604–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314548151

Gupta, A. (2013). Fraud and misconduct in clinical research: A concern. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 4(2), 144. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.111800

Hermanto, Suhendri, H., & Iriani, N. I. (2021). Transparency and accountability in financial reports of religious organizations in the GPDI church Gloria Malang. Jurnal Cakrawala, 10(1).

Johnson, T. M., Zurlo, G. A., & Hickman, A. W. (2015). Embezzlement in the Global Christian Community. Review of Faith and International Affairs, 13(2), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2015.1039302

Keay, A. (2017). Stewardship theory: is board accountability necessary? International Journal of Law and Management, 59(6), 1292–1314.

Mulgan, R. (2001). The accountability of community sector agencies: a comparative framework (No. 85; Issue 85).

O’Connell, L. (2005). Program accountability as an emergent property: The role of stakeholders in a program’s field. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00433.x

Pandiangan, P. (2013). Evaluation on financial reports disclosure in the non-profit organizations. In Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta. Universitas Sanata Dharma.

Paranoan, N., & Totanan, C. (2018). Karma based accountability. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 13(2), 161–172.

Santoso, R., & Sugiarti, Y. (2014). Accountability in Church “X” in Surabaya. Calyptra: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya, 3(2), 1–18.

Shang, S. (2017). A church fraud case study: Understanding the risk. https://bentoforbusiness.com/nonprofit/church-fraud-case-study/

Silvia, J., & Ansar, M. (2011). Accountability in the perspective of Christian church (Phenomenology study in Christian church Donggala Indonesia). 21–22.

Sinclair, A. (1995). The chameleon of accountability: Forms and discourses. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0003-Y

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. SAGE.

Sugiyono. (2021). Quantitative, Qualitative and R & D research method. CV Alfabeta.

Wibowo, E. A., & Kristanto, H. (2017). Corruption in church services: Analysis the potential of fraud and internal control. Jurnal Integritas, 3(2), 105–136.

Wood, L. I., & Wood, D. J. (2014). In God we trust: A case of church financial fraud. Journal of Business Cases and Applications, 11(July).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/tjr.v5i1.51103

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 Creative Commons License

The International Journal Business Review (The Jobs Review) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0

View My Stats