LIKELIHOOD RATING OF FRAUD RISK IN GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT

Mustofa Kamal, Andilo Tohom

Abstract


Indonesian government procurement regulations have undergone some changes towards improvements in procurement governance from 2003 to 2018. However, the facts of 177 corruption cases in procurement [1] showed an increasing trend from 2004 to 2017. This study aimed to prove the likelihood level of risk of fraud government procurement and exemplify a list of government procurement fraud risk ratings. Qualitative research method is used with survey technique via google form to 52 respondents consisting of procurement group, auditor and procurement trainer or risk management trainer. Prospectively, respondents rated likelihood on 66 risk of procurement fraud. The results showed that there are 5 risks have a "frequent" likelihood, there are 54 risks have "occasionally" likelihood, and 7 risks have "almost never" likehood. These results have implications for government agencies to develop proper response or management of procurement fraud risk in accordance with their likelihood.


Keywords


likelihood, procurement fraud risk, prospective

Full Text:

PDF

References


KPK. TPK Berdasarkan Jenis Perkara, Accessed At : https://acch.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/tindak-pidana-korupsi/tpk-berdasarkan-jenis-perkara. (2018)

Government Regulation number 60 of 2008 about Government Internal Control System

Presidential Regulation No. 16 of 2018 about Procurement of Government Goods

Jaffar Nahariah, H. Hasnah, I. T. Mohd, S. Arfah. Fraud Risk Assessment and Detection of Fraud: The Moderating Effect of Personality, International Journal of Bussiness and Management 6, 7. (2011).

A. S. Fazli, I. T.Mohd, M. Z. Muhammaddun. Fraud Risk Factors of Fraud Triangle and the Likelihood of Fraud Occurrence: Evidence from Malaysia, Information Management and Business Review 6, 1, 1-7. (2014).

D. Dain C, E. Matthew S, M. John M.. Internal Control Weaknesses and Financial Reporting Fraud , AUDITING: A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 36, 3, 2017 Pp. 45–69, DOI: 10.2308/ajpt-51608. (2017)

N. Sri, Identifikasi Risiko, Modul Diklat Manajemen Risiko, (Pusdiklatwas BPKP, Bogor, 2010).

LKPP, Mengelola Risiko, Buku Informasi UK 29 Pelatihan Fungsional PBJP, Tim Penyusun Materi Pelatihan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa LKPP, (Direktorat Pelatihan Kompetensi Deputi Bidang Pengembangan Pembinaan Sumber Daya Manusia LKPP, Jakarta, 2016)

AS/NZS. Handbook Risk Management Guidelines Companion to AS/NZA 4360:2004, accesed at https://www.inxsoftware.com/media/transfer/doc/hb_436_2004_guidelines_ to_as_nzs_4360_2004_risk_management_guidelines_companion_to_as_nzs_4360_2004.pdf, tanggal 12 Februari 2018

F. Mochammad dan E. Daissy, Manajemen Risiko Organisasi Sektor Publik, Modul Diklat Teknis Substansi, (Pusdiklatwas BPKP, Bogor, 2015).

Nurharyanto, Pendekatan Teori Permainan dan Konsep Asesmen Risiko Fraud Untuk Melakukan Pencegahan dan Pendeteksian Fraud Pada Sektor Publik, Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Majalah Kampus Pengawasan, No.ISSN: 2442 - 8205, Januari 2016,

Nurharyanto. Konsep dan Implementasi Risk Assessment, Modul Diklat Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP) Dasar, (Pusdiklatwas BPKP, Bogor, 2010)

A. Pandarangga,; Dwihatmoko, J. Utomo; dan Wibowo M. Agung, Studi Pemetaan Potensi dan Antisipasi Tindak Fraud Dalam Proyek Konstruksi, UNDIP, Semarang. Accessed At : https://adipandarangga.wordpress.com/2013/04/13/studi-pemetaan-potensi-dan-antisipasi-tindak-fraud-dalam-proyek-kostruksi/, (2013).

K. Marno, Pemodelan Tindakan Koruptif: Analisis dengan Pendekatan Teori Pilihan Rasional dan Dilema Keagenan, Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Majalah Kampus Pengawasan, No.ISSN: 2442-8205, Januari 2016.

G Imam, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Accessed At : http://fip.um.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/3_Metpen-Kualitatif.pdf, (2018).

R. H. Mudjia, studi kasus dalam penelitian kualitatif: konsep dan prosedurnya, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Accesed At: http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/1104/1/Studi-kasus-dalam-penelitian-kualitatif.pdf

Alfian, Pemetaan Jenis dan Risiko Kecurangan dalam Audit Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa, Jurnal Pengadaan 4, 1 (2015).

Khorana S, Ferguson-Boucher K, Kerr, William. Governance Issues in EU’s e-Procurement Framework : Journal of Common Market Studies Volume 53. Number 2. pp. 292–310. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12179. (2015)

Hoekman, B. Reducing Home Bias in Public Procurement: Trade Agreements and Good Governance. Global Governance 24 (2018), 249–265

Juwita, Ratna. Good Governance and Anti-Corruption: Responsibility to Protect Universal Health Care in Indonesia. Journal of Hasanuddin Law Review. 2018;4(2):162-180 DOI 10.20956/halrev.v4i2.1424




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/tjr.v2i1.17903

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 Creative Commons License

The International Journal Business Review (The Jobs Review) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0

View My Stats