Application of Means Ends Analysis (MEA) Learning Model in Attempt to Improve Student’s High Order Thinking
Abstract
This study is based on the problems that occur in IPS learning in class VIII-D students of SMPN 5 Bandung that is teacher-centered in the classroom and the ability of students to think high-order are still low. The alternative problem solving chosen is by applying the Means Ends Analysis (MEA) learning model. Based on the background, the formulation of this study problem is how the planning, implementation, implementation results and what are the obstacles of the learning model Means Ends Analysis in attempt to improve the ability of high-order thinking. Reviewing the problems to be studied in relation to the learning process, the author chose Classroom Action Research (PTK) with Kemmis and Taggart cycle model in 3 cycles with 12 actions. Implementation of learning by using learning model Means Ends Analysis in improving the ability of students high-order thinking are said to succeed. The improvement of high-order thinking ability of students can be seen from the development of aspects that become
indicators of high-order thinking. All aspects of this indicator have evolved from cycle 1 to cycle 3, from which initially the quality is less, it is sufficient to improve. In conclusion, the implementation of learning model Means Ends Analysis can improve the ability of high-order thinking of students in IPS learning. This is supported by the achievement of all indicators in analyzing and evaluating. Both are in good categories and indicators to create are in enough category.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, L.W and Krathwohl, D.R. 2001. A Taxonomy of Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York Longman.
Dimyati dan Mudjiono. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Gunawan, A.W. (2007). Genius Learning Strategy. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hopkins, D. (2011). Panduan Guru: Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Penerjemah: Achmad Fawaid. Bandung: Rizqi Press.
Huda, M. 2014. Model-Model Pengajaran & Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta : Pusraka Belajar.
Johnson, E.B. (2008). Contextual Teaching Learning. Bandung: MLC.
Komalasari, K. (2011). Pembelajaran Kontekstual Konsep dan Aplikasi. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Mundilarto. 2010. Penilaian Hasil Belajar Fisika. Yogyakarta: P215 UNY
Sapriya. (2007). Konsep Dasar IPS. Bandung: Laboratorium Pendidikan
Kewarganegaraan Jurusan PKN FPIPS Shoimin, A. 2014. 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta : Ar-Ruzz Media.
Lailly, N. R. (2015) “Analisis Soal Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) Dalam Soal UN Kimia SMA Rayon B Tahun 2012/2013” Jurnal Kaunia Vol.XI No. 1, April 2015 Prasetyani, E. DKK (2016) Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Kelas XI Dalam Pembelajaran Trigonometri Berbasis Masalah (Di SMA Negeri 18 Palembang)” JURNAL GANTANG Pendidikan Matematika FKIP -UMRAH Vol. 1 No. 1, Agustus 2016.
Sugiarti. 2009. Upaya Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Ips Sejarah Dengan Model Pembelajaran Mea (Means Ends Analysis) Time Token Model Pada Siswa Kelas Xi Ipa 1 Sma Negeri 1 Maos Kabupaten Cilacap Tahun2008/2009.[Online]tersedia:http://www.google.com/jurnal.unnes.com/Prestasi belajar IPS-MEA.html. (Diakses 8 Maret 2015).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijposs.v2i1.8688
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
View My Stats