Optimization of The Role of FKUB And Kesbangpol Role (Nation and Political Unity) in Handling The Radical Movement of Terrorism in Tasikmalaya District

Rahmat Rahmat, Prayoga Bestari, Encep Syarief Nurdin, Sri Wahyuni Tanshzil

Abstract


This study illustrates the synergy between the Forum for Religious Harmony (FKUB) with the National Unity and Politics (Kesbangpol) in dealing with the radical terrorism movement in Tasikmalaya Regency. Some efforts to handle religious conflicts that lead to radicalism movement include mapping conflict-prone areas, the formation of the Regional Intelligence Community (Kominda) and the Integrated Team for Handling Social Conflicts by the National Unity and Politics and the establishment of the Rukun Living Movement Task Force (SGHR) at the sub-district level by FKUB as a collaborative strategy step handling religious conflicts in Tasikmalaya Regency. The purpose of this study is to determine the role of FKUB as well as the synergy established between local governments, terrorism management institutions and the community in efforts to tackle radical terrorism. The method used in this study is a qualitative approach that emphasizes data collection through interviews, observations, documentation and focused discussions (Focus Group Discussion).

Keywords


Forum for Religious Harmony, National Unity and Politics, Addressing the Radical Movement of Terrorism, Tasikmalaya Regency

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anggito, A & Setiawan, J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Sukabumi: CV Jejak. hlm.9 Djelantik, S. dkk. (2013). Terorisme dan Kekerasan Berlatar Belakang Agama di Jawa Barat. Universitas Katolik Parahyangan: Bandung Hemay, Idris dkk. (2013). Modul Pencegahan Terorisme di Daerah, Badan Nasional Pencegahan Terorisme (BNPT). Iwan. (2018). Focus Group Discussion (Diskusi Kelompok Terfokus)

RAHMAT, PRAYOGA BESTARI, ENCEP SYARIEF NURDIN, SRI WAHYUNI TANSHZIL/ Optimization of The Role of FKUB And Kesbangpol Role (Nation and Political Unity) in Handling The Radical Movement of Terrorism in Tasikmalaya District sebagai Metode Pengumpulan Data Kualitatif. Bandung Nurjannah. (2013). Faktor Pemicu Munculnya Radikalisme Islam Atas Nama Dakwah. Jurnal Dakwah, Vol.14 (2), hlm 179. Petrus Reinhard Golose. (2014). Deradikalisasi Terorisme, Yayasan Pengembangan Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian,Jakarta, (selanjutnya disingkat Petrus Reinhard Golose II) hlm 3 Putra, I made dan I gusti agung. (2018). Sinergitas Kebijakan dan Strategi Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Provinsi Bali. Vyavahara Duta Universitas Udayana, Volume XIII, No.1. Ramakrisna, Kumar. (2009). Radical Pathways: Understanding Muslim Radicalization in Indonesia, Preager Security Internasional: London Sugiono, (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, hlm.52.

Suryono, H. (2008). “Konfigurasi Identitas Nasional, Nasionalisme dalam Era Globalisasi suatu Harapan dan Tantangan”. MIIPS, 7(2). Sofyan, Ayi., & Marjani, GI. (2016). Implementasi Kebijakan Pencegahan Radikal Terorisme di Provinsi Jawa Barat. Bandung : Tim riset UIN SGD Bandung US Army TRADOC, (2007), Military Guide to Terrorism, US TRADOC, Kansas, hlm II-5, URL : fas.org/irp/threat/terrorism/guide.pdf, diakses tanggal 10 Maret 2017. Utawijaya, K. (2019). Focus Group Discussion (Diskusi Kelompok Terfokus) sebagai Metode Pengum18pulan Data Kualitatif. Bandung Wijaya, I.. (2013). “Jawa Barat Paling Rawan Terorisme”. [online] tempo.co. Available at https://nasional.tempo.co/read/51070 1/jawa-barat-paling-rawanterorisme/full&view=ok [Accessed 11 May 2018]




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijposs.v5i1.25919

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View My Stats