The Policy Planning in Providing Teacher Adequacy for Primary Schools in the Local Government

Suroso Suroso

Abstract


ABSTRACT: Adequacy of primary school teachers is very important to support education for all. The objective of the research is to analyse and develop a plan for a public policy of teacher adequacy for state primary schools. This research used a descriptive-quantitative approach. Data collection was conducted by using observation and interview. There are six main findings in the research. One of the important things is that the model of planning policy for teacher adequacy based on class can be adopted by other local governments by incorporating two factors: total schools (S) and total classes (C), and using the formula of nC + 2S.  The planning policy model for teacher adequacy based on students can also be adopted by other local governments by incorporating the total students (S) and student ratio value to teacher (21:1) by using the formula of S/21.  Therefore, planners should conduct policy planning analysis for teacher adequacy of state primary schools in the local government by using two perspective analyses simultaneously to ensure teacher adequacy and manage effective and efficient distribution of teachers.

KEY WORD: Teacher Adequacy; Policy Planning; Local Government; Effective and Efficient Distribution; Primary School. 

ABSTRAKSI: “Perencanaan Kebijakan dalam Penyediaan Kecukupan Guru Sekolah Dasar di Daerah”. Kecukupan guru sekolah dasar sangat penting untuk mendukung pendidikan bagi semua. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa dan mengembangkan model perencanaan bagi kebijakan kecukupan guru sekolah dasar negeri. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif-kuantitatif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan teknik observasi dan wawancara. Ada enam temuan utama dalam penelitian ini. Salah satu yang terpenting adalah bahwa model kebijakan perencanaan kecukupan guru berbasis kelas dapat diadopsi oleh pemerintah daerah lain dengan mengakomodasi 2 faktor: jumlah sekolah (S) dan jumlah kelas (C), dengan menggunakan rumus nC + 2S. Model kebijakan perencanaan kecukupan guru berbasis murid dapat juga diadopsi oleh pemerintah daerah lain dengan mengakomodasi faktor jumlah murid (M) dan nilai rasio murid terhadap guru (21:1), dengan menggunakan rumus M/21. Oleh karena itu, perencana sebaiknya melaksanakan analisa kebijakan perencanaan untuk kecukupan guru sekolah dasar negeri di daerah dengan menggunakan dua perspektif analisis tersebut secara simultan untuk menjamin kecukupan guru, dan pengelolaan efektivitas dan efisiensi distribusi guru.

KATA KUNCI: Kecukupan Guru; Perencanaan Kebijakan; Pemerintah Daerah; Efektivitas dan Efisiensi Distribusi; Sekolah Dasar.

About the Author: Dr. Suroso is a Researcher at the Office of Research and Development, Pati Regency, Jalan Panglima Sudirman No.26 Pati, Central Java, Indonesia. For academic interests, the author is able to be contacted via his e-mails at: suroso_peneliti@yahoo.co.id and surosopati321@gmail.com

How to cite this article? Suroso. (2017). “The Policy Planning in Providing Teacher Adequacy for Primary Schools in the Local Government” in MIMBAR PENDIDIKAN: Jurnal Indonesia untuk Kajian Pendidikan, Vol.2(1) March, pp.95-108. Bandung, Indonesia: UPI [Indonesia University of Education] Press, ISSN 2527-3868 (print) and 2503-457X (online).

Chronicle of the article: Accepted (September 29, 2016); Revised (January 29, 2017); and Published (March 30, 2017).


Keywords


Teacher Adequacy; Policy Planning; Local Government; Effective and Efficient Distribution; Primary School

Full Text:

PDF

References


ACER [Australian Council for Educational Research]. (2015). “The Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality”. Available online at: http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=assessgems [accessed in Pati, Indonesia: March 2, 2016].

Avalos, B. & J. Assael. (2006). “Moving from Resistance to Agreement: The Case of the Chilean Teacher Performance Evaluation” in International Journal of Educational Research, Vol.45, No.4-5, pp.254-266.

Barnett, K., P. McCormick & R. Conners. (2001). “Transformational Leadership in Schools” in Journal of Educational Administration, 39(1), pp.24-46.

Bishop, L. (2007). “A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/Secondary Dualism” in Sociological Research Online: Special Section on Reusing Qualitative Data, 12(3), May. Available online also at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/2.html [accessed in Pati, Indonesia: January 15, 2016].

Bredeson, P. (2003). Designs for Learning: A New Architecture for Professional Development in Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Chrispine, Ochieng. (2013). “Classroom-Based Factors Influencing Teaching and Learning in Public Primary Schools in Ukwala Division of Siaya County, Kenya”. A Research Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Education in Curriculum Studies at the University of Nairobi, Kenya. Available online also at: http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle [accessed in Pati, Indonesia: March 2, 2016].

Danielson, C. (2001). “New Trends in Teacher Evaluation” in Educational Leadership, Vol.58, No.5, pp.12-15.

Ehrenberg, Ronald G. et al. (2001). “Class Size and Student Achievement” in Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Vol.2(1). Available online also at: https://www.psychologicalscience.org/journals/pspi/pdf/pspi2_1.pdf?origin=p [accessed in Pati, Indonesia: January 15, 2016].

EI [Education International]. (2009). Education for All by 2015: Education International’s Response to the Global Monitoring Report 2008. Brussels: Education International.

Fullan, M. & M. Langworthy. (2013). Towards a New End: New Pedagogies for Deep Learning. Seattle: Creative Commons.

Griffin, C.C., H.A. Jones & K.L. Kilgore. (2006). “A Qualitative Study of Student Teachers’ Experiences with Collaborative Problem Solving” in Teacher Education and Special Education, 29(1), pp.44-55

Haddad, Wadi D. (1995). Education Policy-Planning Process: An Applied Framework. Paris: UNESCO [United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization]. Available online also at: http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/11_200.pdf [accessed in Pati, Indonesia: March 2, 2016].

Hagger, H. & D. McIntyre. (2006). Learning Teaching from Teachers. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Hamzah, Nur. (2009). “Pendidikan dan Tenaga Kependidikan” dalam Jurnal MEDTEK, Vol.1, No.2, hlm.1-10.

Handini, O. & R. Widyaningrum. (2016). “Kontribusi Pedagogik dan Kompetensi Profesional Guru terhadap Manajemen Kelas” dalam Jurnal Profesi Pendidik, Vol.3, No.1, hlm.36-43.

Hanushek, E.A. (2003). “The Failure if Input-Based Schooling Policies” in Economic Journal, Vol.113, No.48, 5 February, pp.64-98.

Hungi, N. (2011). “Characteristics of Grade 6 Pupils: Their Homes and Learning Environments”. Paper presented in the SEACMEQ (Southern and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality) in Paris, France.

Ibe-Bassey, G.S. (1987). “Selecting Instructional Materials within the Process of Planning Lessons” in Journal of Research in Curriculum, Vol.5, No.1, pp.45-56.

Jehl, Jeanne et al. (2001). Education and Community Building: Connecting Two Worlds. Washington, D.C.: Institute for Educational Leadership.

Kelly, M. (2005). Primary and Secondary Data. New York: McKinnon Secondary College.

Kemdiknas RI [Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia]. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Penerbit Sinar Grafika.

Kemdiknas RI [Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia]. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 41 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Proses untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Setjen Kemdiknas RI [Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia].

Kemdiknas RI [Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia]. (2009). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 39 Tahun 2009 tentang Pemenuhan Beban Kerja Guru dan Pengawas Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Biro Hukum dan Organisasi, Kemdiknas RI.

Kemdiknas RI [Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia]. (2011). Surat Keputusan Bersama (SKB) oleh Lima Menteri, yaitu Menteri Pendidikan Nasional, Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi, Menteri Dalam Negeri, Menteri Keuangan, dan Menteri Agama dengan Nomor: 05/x/pb/2011,SPB/03/M.PAN-RB/10/2011, 48 Tahun 2011, 158/PMK/01/2011, 11 Tahun 2011, Tahun 2011 tentang Penataan dan Pemerataan Guru Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Jakarta: Setjen Kemdiknas RI [Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia].

Kiprono, F.J., M. Nganga & J. Kanyiri. (2015). “An Assessment of School Management Commitees’ Capacity in the Implementation of FPE Funds in the Public Primary Schools: A Survey of Eldoret East District, Kenya” in International Journal of Education and Research, Vol.3, No.1, pp.243.

Kosnik, C. & C. Beck. (2009). Priorities in Teacher Education: The 7 Key Elements of Pre-Service Preparation. Oxford: Routledge.

Kusumoto, Yoko. (2008). “Needs Analysis: Developing a Teacher Training Program for Elementary School Homeroom Teachers in Japan” in Second Language Studies, 26(2), Spring, pp.1-44. Available online also at: http://www.hawaii.edu/sls/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Kusumoto.pdf [accessed in Pati, Indonesia: January 15, 2016].

“Local Governments and Schools: A Community Oriented Approach”. Available online at: file:///C:/Users/acer/Downloads/%7BD0E0026C-7C49-447E-ADF0-F7C5E52A9D16%7D.pdf [accessed in Pati, Indonesia: January 15, 2016].

Moore, N. (2006). “The Contexts of Context: Broadening Perspectives in the (Re)Use of Qualitative Data” in Sociological Research Online: Special Section on Reusing Qualitative Data, 12(3). Available online also at: http://erdt.plymouth.ac.uk/mionline/public_html/viewarticle.php?id=27&layout=html [accessed in Pati, Indonesia: January 15, 2016].

Mugenda, O. & A. Mugenda. (1999). Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press.

Mulford, Bill. (2003). “School Leaders: Changing Roles and Impact on Teacher and School Effectiveness”. A paper commissioned by the Education and Training Policy Division, OECD, for the Activity Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Available online also at: https://www.oecd.org/edu/school/2635399.pdf [accessed in Pati, Indonesia: January 15, 2016].

Nzomo, J. & D. Makuwa. (2006). “How Can Countries Move from Cross-National Research Results to Dissemination and then to Policy Reform?: Case Studies from Kenya and Namibia” in K. Ross & I.J. Genevois [eds]. Cross-National Studies of the Quality of Education. Paris: UNESCO [United Nations for Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization], pp.213-228.

Nugroho, Riant. (2006). Kebijakan Publik untuk Negara-negara Berkembang. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Ochieng, P.A. (2009). “An Analysis of the Strengths and Limitation of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Paradigms” in Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 13, pp.13-18.

Orodho, J.A. (2002). Techniques of Writing Research Proposals and Reports in Education and Social Sciences. Nairobi: Masola Publishers.

O’Sullivan, E. & G.R. Rassel. (1999). Research Methods for Public Administrators. London: Longman, 3rd edition.

Peterson, K. (2000). Teacher Evaluation: A Comprehensive Guide to New Directions and Practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2nd edition.

Schutt, R. (2006). Investigating the Social World. New York: Sage Publications.

Setneg RI [Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia]. (2005). Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.

Setneg RI [Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia]. (2008). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 47 Tahun 2008 tentang Wajib Belajar. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.

Stockey, E. & R. Zeckhauser. (1978). A Primer for Policy Analysis. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

Suparlan. (2006). Guru sebagai Profesi. Yogyakarta: Hikayat Publishing.

Syamsuri, I. (2010). “Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru untuk Meningkatkan Minat Siswa pada Bidang MIPA”. Makalah dalam Lokakarya MIPA [Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam]-net di Institut Pertanian Bogor, pada tanggal 26-27 Juli.

Torma, Tim. (2004). “Back to School for Planners” in Planning Commissioners Journal, Issue of October. Available online also at: http://www.plannersweb.com/schools.html [accessed in Pati, Indonesia: January 15, 2016].

UNESCO [United Nations for Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization]. (2012). Untangling Aid in National Education Budgets: EFA Global Monitoring Report Background Paper. Paris: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.

UNESCO [United Nations for Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization]. (2013). Schooling of Millions of Children Jeopardized by Reductions in Aid: Global Monitoring Report Policy, Paper 9. Paris: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.

UNESCO [United Nations for Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization]. (2014a). Education for All: Global Monitoring Report 2013. Paris: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.

UNESCO [United Nations for Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization]. (2014b). Education Strategy, 2014-2021. Paris: United Nations for Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Verwimp, P. (1999). “Measuring the Quality of Education at Two Levels: A Case Study of Primary Schools in Rural Ethiopia” in International Review of Education, 45(2), pp.167-196.

WB [World Bank]. (1998). Education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Policies of Readjustment, Revitalization, and Expansion. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

Widiarsa, I.G.P., A. Marhaeni & I.M. Sutama. (2013). “Kontribusi Kompetensi Paedagogik dan Kompetensi Profesional terhadap Manajemen Kelas” dalam E-journal Pasca UNDIKSA, Vol.3, No.1, hlm.1-11.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbardik.v2i1.6025

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

MIMBAR PENDIDIKAN: Jurnal Indonesia untuk Kajian Pendidikan, is published by UPI Press in Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.

 Lisensi Creative Commons

MIMBAR PENDIDIKAN: Jurnal Indonesia untuk Kajian Pendidikan of Indonesia University of Education disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
Berdasarkan ciptaan pada https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/mimbardik/.

View My Stats