PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA SUNDA DI WILAYAH PERBATASAN: DILEMA IMPLEMENTASI KURIKULUM 2013

Lungguh Puri Pramswari

Abstract


Curriculum 2013 provides flexibility to all practitioners of formal education to continue to develop local contentas a form of wealth typical of the region that needs to be maintained and preserved. One of the local content that its existence has importance values is Bahasa Sunda. Teaching Bahasa Sunda in a region where based on a strong Sundanese culture, will not encounter many obstacles. However, in the corners of the area which incidentally is the city/county with very heterogeneous demographi cconditions, of course teaching Bahasa Sunda will be filled with challenges. For example, in areas bordering other culture such Betawi and Java, because of the flexibility of the culture, Sundanese people will be influenced by the Betawior Javanese speech and cultured. This paper is the result of research conducted on the raised border of the city of Bogor, on the implementation of Curriculum 2013, which continued to develop local content Bahasa Sunda to equip students with the knowledge, skills, and attitude typical of Sundanese culture appropriate local wisdom. But on the other hand, collided with a dilemma, where border communitiesis very heterogeneous, so the Sundanese culture and language had not been well maintained.

Keywords: local content, Sundanese, cultural borders.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Astuti, K.D. (2014). Rebo Nyunda Mulai Diterapkan di Bogor. Pikiran Rakyat. 5 November, hal. 16.

Badudu, Jusuf Sjarif. (1989).Hakikat Bahasa. Tersedia: http://meystkip. wordpress.com/materi-kuliah/hakikat-bahasa/ [22 September 2014]

Ethnoloque. (2012). Perlindungan Bahasa Daerah dalam Kerangka Kebijakan Nasional Kebahasaan. Tersedia: http://badanbahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/ lamanbahasa/artikel/1343[22 September 2014]

Kentjono, Dj. (1982). Hakikat Bahasa. Tersedia: http://meystkip. wordpress.com/ materi-kuliah/hakikat-bahasa/ [22 September 2014]

Keraf, G. (1984). Hakikat Bahasa. Tersedia: http://meystkip.wordpress.com/ materi-kuliah/hakikat-bahasa/ [22 September 2014]

Kridalaksana(1983). Hakikat Bahasa. Tersedia:http://meystkip.wordpress.com/ materi-kuliah/hakikat-bahasa/

Maulana (2006). Alternatif Perkuliahan Matematika dengan Menggunakan Metafora. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, No.1 Bulan April. Salminen (1999). Bahasa Daerah dan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. Tersedia: http://badanbahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/lamanbahasa/artikel/1343[22 September 2014]

Sapir, E. (1221). Hakikat Bahasa. Tersedia: http://meystkip.wordpress.com/ materi-kuliah/hakikat-bahasa/[22 September 2014] Sukmadinata, N.S. (2011). Metode Penelitian Deskriptif. Tersedia: http:// daun2001.blogspot.com/2013/05/rancangan-penelitian-deskriptif.html[22 September 2014]

Withney (1960). Metode Penelitian Deskriptif. Tersedia: http://daun2001. blogspot.com/2013/05/rancangan-penelitian-deskriptif.html[22 September 2014].

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1950 tentang Dasar-dasar Pendidikan dan Pengajaran.

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 1954 tentang Dasar-Dasar Pendidikan dan Pengajaran di Sekolah untuk Seluruh Indonesia.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1989 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2009 tentang Bendera, Bahasa, dan Lambang Negara, serta Lagu Kebangsaan.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v1i2.884

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2014 Mimbar Sekolah Dasar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View Mimbar Sekolah Dasar Stats