Email the author 
.png)
Affective Tendencies of Science Teachers in Teaching Socioscientific Issues
Abstract
This study aims at identifying the intrinsic affective tendencies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues (SSI) based on different variables and their personal perspectives. The participants of the study consisted of 394 science teachers who taught at public schools during the 2021 and 2022 academic years. Regarding the research method, a mixed method that combined quantitative and qualitative research methods was employed in this study. Quantitatively, the "Affective Tendency Scale for Teaching Socioscientific Issues” comprising four dimensions and 28 items was applied to 394 science teachers. Meanwhile, qualitatively, semi-structured interviews were conducted with six science teachers from the total participant teachers who volunteered to take part. Subsequently, for statistical operations in this study, the SPSS program was utilized to analyze the quantitative and qualitative data in a descriptive manner. Conclusively, the results revealed that science teachers' affective tendencies in teaching SSI (Socioscientific Issues) were high on both quantitative and qualitative levels.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Albe, V. (2008). When Scientific Knowledge, Daily Life Experience, Epistemological and Social Considerations Intersect: Students’ Argumentation in Group Discussions on a Socio-scientific Issue. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9040-2
Atalay, N., & Çaycı, B. (2017). Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Sosyobilimsel Konular Hakkındaki Görüş ve Tutumlarının Farklı Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi [Examination of Opinion and Attitudes of Class Teacher Candidates on Socioscientific Issues by Different Variables]. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Türk Dünyası Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Eğitim Dergisi, 2(2), 35–45.
Aydin, G. Ş., Sarıbaş, D., Özalp, D., & Yılmaz, Ş. (2021). Biyoloji Öğretmenlerinin Sosyo-Bilimsel Konuların Öğretimine Yönelik Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi [Exploring Biology Teachers’ Views on Teaching SocioScientific Issues]. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.827736
Babacan, M. A. (2017). Sosyobilimsel Konulardaki Etkinliklerin Yedinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Eleştirel Düşünme Becerilerine Etkisi [The Effect of Activities About Socioscientific Issues on 7. Grade Student Critical Thinking Abilities]. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi.
Cebesoy, Ü. B., & Dönmez Şahin, M. (2013). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının sosyobilimsel Konulara Yönelik Tutumlarının Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından Incelenmesi [Investıgatıng Pre-Servıce Scıence Teachers’ Attıtudes Towards Socıoscıentıfıc Issues In Terms Of Gender And Class Level]. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 37, 100–117.
Çopur, A. (2015). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmenlerinin Tartışmalı Konuların Öğretimine Ilişkin Düşüncelerinin Incelenmesi [A Revıew on the Opınıons Of Socıal Studıes Teachers on Teachıng Controversıal Issues]. Uludağ Üniversitesi.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Day, S. P., & Bryce, T. G. K. (2011). Does the Discussion of Socio‐Scientific Issues require a Paradigm Shift in Science Teachers’ Thinking? International Journal of Science Education, 33(12), 1675–1702. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.519804
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
Enginar, İ., Saka, A., & Sesli, E. (2002). Lise 2 Öğrencilerinin Biyoloji Derslerinde Kazandıkları Bilgileri Güncel Olaylarla Ilişkilendirebilme Düzeyleri [Levels of Associating the Knowledge Gained in Biology Lessons with Current Events of Two High School Students]. V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, 22.
Erkol, M., & Gül, Ş. (2020). Fen Bi̇lgi̇si̇ Öğretmen Adaylarini Sosyobi̇li̇msel Konulara Yöneli̇k Tutumlari [Prospective Science Teachers’ Attitudes towards Socioscientific Issues]. PESA Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.25272/j.2149-8385.2020.6.1.02 FEN
Evren Yapıcıoğlu, A., & Kaptan, F. (2018). Sosyobilimsel Durum Temelli Öğretim Yaklaşımının Argümantasyon Becerilerinin Gelişimine Katkısı: Bir Karma Yöntem Araştırması [Contribution of Socioscientific Issue Based Instruction Approach to Development of Argumentation Skills: A Mixed Research Method. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.278052
Goloğlu, S. (2009). Fen Eğitiminde Sosyo-Bilimsel Aktivitelerle Karar Verme Becerilerinin Geliştirilmesi: Dengeli Beslenme [Developing Decision Making Skills With Socio-Scientific Activities in Science Education: Balanced (HEALTHY) Nutrition]. Marmara Üniversitesi.
Gürbüzkol, R., & Bakırcı, H. (2020). Fen Bilimleri Öğretmenlerinin Sosyobilimsel Konular Hakkındaki Tutum ve Görüşlerinin Belirlenmesi [Identifying Science Teachers’ Attitudes and Opinions about Socio-scientific Issues]. Yuzunci Yil Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 17(1), 700–721. https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.710059
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The Nature of Science Education for Enhancing Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549
Johnson, J., Macalalag, A. Z., & Dunphy, J. (2020). Incorporating Socioscientific Issues into a STEM Education Course: Exploring Teacher Use of Argumentation in SSI and Plans for Classroom Implementation. In Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research (Vol. 2, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-020-00026-3
Karahan, E. (2015). Case Studies of Secondary School Teachers Designing Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction and Their Students’ Socioscientific Reasoning [University of Minnesota]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269107473_What_is_governance/link/548173090cf22525dcb61443/download%0Ahttp://www.econ.upf.edu/~reynal/Civil wars_12December2010.pdf%0Ahttps://think-asia.org/handle/11540/8282%0Ahttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41857625
Klosterman, M. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2010). Multi‐level Assessment of Scientific Content Knowledge Gains Associated with Socioscientific Issues‐based Instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1017–1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902894512
Lee, H., Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., & Choi, K. (2006). Korean Science Teachers’ Perceptions of the Introduction of Socio‐Scientific Issues into the Science Curriculum. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(2), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150609556691
MoNE. (2013). Science Curriculum (Primary and Secondary School 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8th Grades. MoNE Board of Education and Training Board, Ministry of National Education.
MoNE. (2018). Science Curriculum (Primary and Secondary School 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8th Grades). MoNE Board of Education and Training Board, Ministry of National Education.
Nielsen, J. A. (2012). Science in Discussions: An Analysis of the Use of Science Content in Socioscientific Discussions. Science Education, 96(3), 428–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21001
Nuangchalerm, P., & Kwuanthong, B. (2010). Teaching “Global Warming” through Socioscientific issues-based Instruction. Asian Social Science, 6(8), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v6n8p42
Owens, D. C., Sadler, T. D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2021). Teaching Practices for Enactment of Socio-scientific Issues Instruction: an Instrumental Case Study of an Experienced Biology Teacher. Research in Science Education, 51(2), 375–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9799-3
Öztürk, A. (2013). Sosyobilimsel Konularla Argümantasyon Becerisi Ve İnsan Haklarına Karşı Tutum Geliştirmeye Yönelik Bir Eylem Araştırması [An Action Research about Argumentation Skill on Socio-Scientific Issues and Development of Attitudes towards Human Rights]. Çukurova Üniversitesi.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues: A Critical Review of Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific Literacy, PISA, and Socioscientific Discourse: Assessment for Progressive Aims of Science Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909–921. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20327
Sakmen, G., & Genç, M. (2021). Sosyobilimsel Konuların Öğretimine Yönelik Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması [Scale Development Study for Teaching Socioscientific Issues]. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.883764
Saunders, K. J., & Rennie, L. J. (2013). A Pedagogical Model for Ethical Inquiry into Socioscientific Issues In Science. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9248-z
Sönmez, A., & Kılınç, A. (2012). Preservice Science Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs About Teaching GM Foods: The Potential Effects Of Some Psychometric Factors. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 49–76.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson.
Tekin, N., & Aslan, O. (2019). Öğretmen Adaylarının Sosyobilimsel Konulara Yönelik Tutumlarının Çeşitli Değişkenler Bakımından İncelenmesi [Investigation of Pre-service Teachers’ Attitudes towards Socioscientific Issues with respect to Different Variables]. F.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 29(1), 133–141.
Topçu, M. S. (2008). Fen Öğretmen Adaylarının Sosyoblimsel Konular Hakkındaki Kritik Düşünme Yetenekleri ve Bu Yetenekleri Etkileyen Faktörler [Preservice Science Teachers’ Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues and the Factors Influencing Their Informal Reasonin. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.
Topçu, M. S., Muğaloğlu, E. Z., & Güven, D. (2014). Fen Eğitiminde Sosyobilimsel Konular: Türkiye Örneği [Socioscientific Issues in Science Education: The Case of Turkey. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 14(6), 2340–2348. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.6.2226
Türkmen, H., Pekmez, E., & Saglam, M. (2017). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Sosyo-Bilimsel Konular Hakkındaki Düşünceleri [Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Thoughts about Socio-Scientific Issues]. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 18(2), 448–475. https://doi.org/10.12984/egeefd.295597
Varal, E., & Belge Can, Ö. Ü. H. (2020). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Sosyoblimsel Konular Bağlamında Pedagojik Alan Bilgilerinin İncelenmesi [Investıgatıng Preservıce Scıence Teachers’ Pedagogıcal Content Knowledge In The Context Of Socıo-Scıentıfıc Issue]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(10), 21–42.
Yıldırım, İ., & Bakırcı, H. (2020). Ortak Bilgi Yapılandırma Modeline Dayalı Fen Öğretiminin Sekizinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Sosyobilimsel Konular Hakkındaki Görüşlerine Yansımasının İncelenmesi [Issues and Common Knowledge Construction Model Based Science Teaching]. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 1051–1070. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.735702
Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New Directions in Socioscientific Issues Research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7
Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. (2003). The Role of Moral Reasoning and the Status of Socioscientific Issues in Science Education: Philosophical, Psychological and Pedagogical Considerations. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education (pp. 7–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4996-x_2
Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). Social and Ethical Issues in Science Education: A Prelude to Action. Science & Education, 17(8), 799–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9130-6
Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled Up in Views: Beliefs in the Nature of Science and Responses to Socioscientific Dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v9i2.45357
Refbacks
Copyright (c) 2022 Mimbar Sekolah Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View Mimbar Sekolah Dasar Stats