Email this article 
GAMBARAN PANDANGAN MAHASISWA CALON GURU BIOLOGI DAN GURU IPA TENTANG INKUIRI ILMIAH
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Inkuiri ilmiah merupakan salah satu tujuan penting dalam pembelajaran sains yang disarankan kurikulum namun pelaksanaannya tidak seperti yang diinginkan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengeksplorasi pemahaman inkuri ilmiah mahasiswa calon guru biologi/IPA dan guru IPA. Sebanyak 34 orang mahasiswa program studi Pendidikan Biologi semester 7 dan 25 orang guru IPA terlibat dalam penelitian ini. Gambaran pemahaman inkuiri ilmiah dieksplor dengan menggunakan kuesioner VASI (Views About Scientific Inquiry. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman mahasiswa calon guru Biologi/IPA lebih baik daripada guru IPA pada beberapa aspek inkuiri ilmiah. Namun demikian, kedua kelompok responden masih memiliki pemahaman yang kurang pada aspek karakteristik penyelidikan ilmiah, fungsi pertanyaan dalam sebuah penelitian, hubungan antara pertanyaan, prosedur dan kesimpulan. Kedua kelompok juga belum memahami tentang bukti ilmiah, alasan memilih prosedur, dan hubungan antara data yang ditemukan dengan penelitian sebelumnya.
ABSTRACT
Scientific inquiry is the main objective of science education. However, its practice was not as we want it to be. This research objective was to explore prospective biology teachers’ and science teachers’ views on scientific inquiry. Thirty four-seventh semester biology students and 25 science teachers participated in this research. Scientific inquiry was explored using Views About Scientific Inquiry (VASI) Questionnaire. Results showed that understanding level of pre-service biology teachers was better than science teachers understanding in some aspects of scientific inquiry. However, both respondents lack understanding of some aspects in scientific inquiry, i.e. scientific investigation characteristics, an investigation begin with a question, question guides a procedure, scientific evidence, procedure selection, and the relation data collecting and previous investigation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adisendjaja, Y. H. (2010). Field Study: Studi Pendahuluan tentang Pembelajaran IPA di SMP. Laporan Penelitian. Tidak diterbitkan.
Anderson, R. D., (2002). Reforming Science Teaching: What Research Says About Inquiry? Journal of Science Teacher Education, Vol. 13, No. 1, hlm. 1-12.
Bell, Maeng, & Peters (2013). Scientific Inquiry and The Nature of Science. The Journal of Mathematics and Science, Vol. 13, hlm. 5-25.
Colburn, A. (2000). An Inquiry Primer. Science Scope. (March 2000), hlm.42-44.
Goldstein, M & Goldstein, I.F. 1980. How We Know, New York: Plenum Press.
Crowther, D., & Rayman-Bacchus, L. (2004). Introduction: perspectives on corporate social responsibility; dalam D. Crowther &L. Rayman-Bacchus (eds),Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility; Aldershot: Ashgate
Gyllenpalm, J., Wickman, P., & Holmgren, S., (2010). Teachers’ Language on Scientific Inquiry: Methods of Teaching or Methods of Inquiry? International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 12, No. 9, hlm. 1151-1172.
Khishfe, R. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of Explicit and Reflective Versus Implicit Inquiry-Oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders’ Views on Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teachin,. Vol. 39, No. 7, hlm. 551-578.
Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science Teaching and the Development of Thinking. Belmont California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Lederman, J.S., Lederman, N.G., Bartos, S.A., Bartels, S.L. Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Understanding about Scientific Inquiry-The Views about Scientific Inquiry (VASI) Questionaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 51, No. 1, hlm .65-83.
Lederman, J. S., (2009). Teaching Scientific Inquiry: Exploration, Directed, Guided and Open-Ended Levels. In National geographic science: Best Practice and Research Base. hlm. 8-20. Hapton Brown Publisher.
Lederman, J. S. & Lederman, N. G, (2004). Early Elementary Students’ and Teachers’ Understanding of Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry: Lesson Learned From Project ICAN. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Vancouver, British Columbia. April, 2004. [Online] http://msed.iit.edu/projectican/documents/Paper%203.pdf [21 Januari 2011]
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F. Bell, R. L. & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol.39, No.6, hlm.497-521.
Lederman, J.S., Lederman, N.G., Bartos, S.A., Bartels, S.L. Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Understanding about Scientific Inquiry-The Views About Scientific Inquiry (VASI) Questionaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 51, No. 1, hlm. 65-83.
Lewis, K. G., (2014). Developing Questioning, Center for Teaching Effectiveness, The University of Texas at Austin. [Online]. http://www.udel.edu/chem/white/U460/Devel-question-skill-UTx.pdf [5 Maret 2015].
McBride, J. W., Bhatti, M. I., Hannan, M. A., Feinberg, M. (2004). Using an Inquiry Approach to Teach Science to Secondary School Science Teachers. Physics Education, Vol. 39, No. 5, hlm. 1-6.
McCain, K. (2015). Explanation and the Nature of Scientific Knowledge. Science and Education, Vol. 24, No. 7, hlm. 827-854.
National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington DC: National Academic Press.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R. & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas about science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 40, No. 7, hlm. 692-720.
Schwartz, R.S., Lederman, N.G. & Crawford, B.A., (2004). Developing Views of Nature of Science in an Authentic Context: An Explicit Approach to Bridging the Gap between Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry. Science Teacher Education, Vol. 88, No. 4, hlm. 610-645.
Schwartz, R.S., Lederman, N., Khishfe, R., Lederman, J.S., Mathews, L., & Liu,S. (2002). Explicit/Reflective Instructional Attention to Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry: Impact on Student Learning. Paper Presented at The 2002 Annual International Conference of The Association for The Education of Teachers in Science.
Tokmak, H., S., Surmeli, H., and Ozgelen, S.(2013) Preservice Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Their TPACK Development after Creating Digital Stories. International Journal of Environmental & Science, Vol. 9, hlm. 247-264.
Zar, J.H. (1984). Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs-NJ: Prentice-Hall.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v21i1.36260
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching
All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616
Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)
View JPMIPA Stats