PENERAPAN MODEL SIKLUS BELAJAR 5E TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN KONSEP BIOLOGI UMUM DAN KEMAMPUAN APLIKASI SAINS MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN BIOLOGI
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Pergeseran paradigma pendidikan dan perkuliahan menyebabkan perkuliahan mulai mengarah pada konstruktivistik, yaitu perkuliahan yang berpusat pada mahasiswa (student-centered). Siklus Belajar 5E (learning cycle) merupakan salah satu model perkuliahan yang berbasis konstuktivistik yaitu perkuliahan yang menekankan bahwa mahasiswa sendirilah yang akan membangun pengetahuannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan pemahaman konsep dan kemampuan aplikasi sains mahasiswa antara kelas yang menggunakan Model Siklus Belajar 5E dibanding kelas kontrol pada perkuliahan Biologi Umum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kuasi eksperimen dengan pendekatan kuantitatif melalui uji-t sampel berpasangan (paired sample t-test). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan pemahaman konsep dan kemampuan aplikasi sains yang signifikan antara kelompok yang menggunakan Model Siklus Belajar 5E dibanding kelas kontrol. Rata-rata skor postes pemahaman konsep dan kemampuan aplikasi sains mahasiswa di kelas yang menggunakan Model Siklus Belajar 5E lebih tinggi dibandingkan kelas kontrol.
ABSTRACT
A shift in education and lectures paradigm leads to a constructivistic lectures, i.e. lectures that are more students-centered. Learning cycle is one of the lecturing models based on constructivist aspect which emphasizes that students themselves will create their knowledge. The purpose of this study was to know differences in students’ concept understanding and science application ability between students using learning cycle model and control class in general biology lecture. The method used in this study was quasi-experimental study with quantitative approach through paired sample t-test. Results showed that there were significant differences in concept understanding and science application ability between students using learning cycle model and control class. The average concept understanding and science application ability score for students using learning cycle model was higher than that of control class.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ajaja, P.O., Urhievwejire, O.E.. (2012). Effect of 5E Learning Cycle on Students’ Achivement Biology and Chemistry. Cypriot Journal Educational Sciences Vol. 7 No. 3, hlm. 244-262.
Ajaja, P.O. (2013). Which strategy best suits biology teaching? Lecturing, concept mapping, cooperative learning or learning cycle?. Electronic Journal of Science Education Vol. 17, No. 1, hlm. 1-37.
Appamaraka, S. Suksringarm, P., & Singseewo, A. (2009). Effects of Learning Environment Education Using The %Es Learning Cycle Approach with The Metacognitive Moves and the Teachers’s Handbook Approach on Learning Achievement, Integrated Science Process Skills and Critical Thinking of High Schools (Grade 9) Students. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 6 No. 5, hlm. 287-291.
Bybee, R.W., Taylor, J.A, Gardner,A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J.C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Application. Colorado: BSCS.
Bybee, R.W. (2014). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Personal Reflections and Contem-porary Implications. Science and Childern Vol. 51 No. 8, hlm. 10-13.
Ceylan, E. & Geban, O. (2009). Facilitating Conceptual Change in Understanding State of Matter and Solubility Concepts By Using 5E Learning Cycle Model. H.U. Journal of Education Vol. 36, hlm. 41-50.
Dahar, R.W. (1996). Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Lawson, A.E., Abraham, M.R., & Renner, J.W. (1989). A Theory of Instruction: Using the Learning Cycle to Teach Science Concepts and Thinking Skills. Cincinnati: NARST.
Kaynar, D., Tekkaya, C., & Cakiroglu, J. (2009). Effectiveness of 5E Learning Cycle Instruction On Students’ Achievement in Cell Concept and Scientific Epistemo-logical Beliefs’. H.U. Journal of Edu-cation Vol. 37, hlm. 96-105.
Novianawati, I. (2009). Penerapan Model pem-belajaran Siklus Belajar 5E Empiris-Induktif (SBEI) pada Materi Laju Reaksi untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Kimia siswa. (PTK pada mahasiswa kelas XI 1 SMA Yadika Natar Tahun Perkuliahan 2008/2009). Skripsi. FPMIPA Universitas Lampung, Lampung.
Murdhiyah, N., & Suryanti. (2014). Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Vol. 2 No. 2, hlm. 1-10.
Qarareh, A.O. (2012). The Effect of Using the Learning Cycle Method in Teaching Science on the Educational Achievement of the Sixth Graders. Journal of Education Science Vol. 4 No.2, hlm. 123-132.
Sadi, O., & Cakiroglu, J. 2010). Effects of 5E Learning Cycle on Students’ Human Circulatory System Achievement. Journal of Applied Biological Sciences Vol. 4 NO. 3, hlm. 63-67
Sumarmo, U. (1987). Kemampuam Pemahaman dan Penalaran Biologi Umum dengan Kemampuan Penalaran Logik Siswa dan Beberapa Unsur Proses Belajar-Mengajar. Skripsi. IKIP, Bandung.
Suparno, S.J. (1997). Filsafat Konstruktivisme Dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Utari. S., Alfiani, Feranie, S., Aviyanti, L., Sari, I.M., & Hasanah, L. (2013). Application of Learning Cycle 5e Model Aided Cmaptools-Based Media Prototype to Improve Student Cognitive Learning Outcomes. Applied Physics Research Vol. 4 No. 5, hlm. 69-76.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i1.36200
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching
All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616
Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)
View JPMIPA Stats