PROFIL MOTIVASI BELAJAR MAHASISWA CALON GURU KIMIA DAN KORELASINYA TERHADAP MODEL MENTAL
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui profil motivasi belajar Mahasiswa Calon Guru Kimia (MCGK) tingkat I sampai dengan tingkat IV. Selain itu, juga dikaji korelasi antara motivasi dengan model mental kimia sekolah. Penelitian dilakukan menggunakan metode kuantitatif non eksperimen, dengan desain survei lintas-bagian (cross-sectional survey) dan melibatkan 124 mahasiswa calon guru kimia di jurusan Pendidikan Kimia pada salah satu Universitas di Bandung. Data dikumpulkan melalui Kuesioner Motivasi Belajar Kimia (KMBK) dan Tes Diagnostik Model Mental Kimia Sekolah (TDMKS). Hasil analisis deskriptif menunjukkan motivasi belajar MCGK pada kategori rendah untuk tingkat I (M=3,04; SD=0,24) dan kategori sedang untuk tingkat II (M=3,56; SD=0,20), tingkat III (M=3,78; SD=0,26), dan tingkat IV (M=3,89; SD=0,25). Hasil uji Kruskal Wallis menunjukkan adanya perbedaan secara signifikan pada sebagian besar jenis motivasi belajar MCGK berdasarkan tingkat kelas, kecuali jenis target prestasi. Motivasi belajar MCGK berkorelasi pada tingkat sedang dengan model mental kimia sekolah (r=0,399; p<0,01).
ABSTRACT
The aim of this research was to know the learning motivation profile of the Pre-service Chemistry Teacher (PCT) from the first to the fourth grade. Besides that, the correlation between motivation and school chemistry mental model was also examined. The research was conducted using non-experiment quantitative model, with the cross-sectional survey design and involved 124 PCT in Chemistry Education Department in one of universities in Bandung. The data was collected from the Questionnaire of Motivation toward Chemistry Learning (QMCL) and the Diagnostic Test of School Chemistry Mental Models (DTSCM). The result of the descriptive analysis showed that the learning motivation of PCT was in the low category for the first grade (M=3,04; SD=0,24) and the middle category for the second (M=3,56; SD=0,20), the third (M=3,78; SD=0,26), and the fourth grade (M=3,89; SD=0,25). The result of Kruskal Wallis Test showed there was a significant difference in most of the learning motivations of PCT according to grades, except for achievement goals. The learning motivaton of PCT moderately correlated with school chemistry mental model (r=0,399; p<0,01).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akbas, A. & Kan, A. (2007). Affective factors that influence chemistry achievement (motivation and anxiety) and the power of these factors to predict chemistry achievement-ii. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(1), 10-19.
Altman, D.G. (2009). Parametric v non-parametric methods for data analysis. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a3167
Bodner, G.M. dan Domin, D.S. (2000). Mentals Models: The Roles of Representation in Problem Solving in Chemistry. University Chemistry Education, 4, 24-30.
Biehler, R.F. & Snowman, J. (1997). Psychology applied to teaching. Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Cavas, P. (2011). Factors Affecting The Motivation of Turkish Primary Students for Science Learning. Science Education International, 22(1), 31-42.
Chittleborough, G. (2004). The Role of Teaching Model dan Chemical Representation in Developing Students Mental Models in Chemical Phenomena. Tesis: Curtin University of Technology.
Franco, C., & Colinvaux, D. (2000). Grasping mental models, dalam Gilbert, J. K. & Boulter, C. J., Developing models in science education (hlm. 93-118). Dordreccht: Kluwer.
Jansoon, N. Coll, R. K. & Somsook, E. (2009). Understdaning Mental Models of Dilution in Thai Students. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 4(2), 147-168.
Lee, O., & Brophy, J. (1996). Motivational Patterns Observed in Sixth-Grade Science Classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 33(3), 585–610.
Palmer, D. (2005). A Motivational View of Constructivist-informed Teaching. International Journal of Science Education. 27(15), 1853-1881.
Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning Difficulties in Chemistry: An Overview. Journal of Turkish science education. 4 (2), 2-20.
Sevinç, B., Özmen, H., & Yiğit, N. (2011). Investigation of primary students’ motivation levels towards science learning. Science Education International, 22(3), 218-232.
Schunk, D.H., Pintrich, P.R., & Meece, J.L. (2010). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research and Applications (3nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill Company.
Taber, K. S. (2001). The Mismatch Between Assumed Prior Knowledge and The Learner’s Conceptions: A Typology of Learning Impediments. Educational Studies, 27(2), 159–169.
Tuan, H. L. , Chin, C. C. & Tsai, C. C. (2005). The Development of A Questionnaire to Measure Students’ Motivation Towards Science Learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 634-659.
Wang, C. Y. (2007). The Role Of Mental-Modeling Ability, Content Knowledge, and Mental Models In General Chemistry Students’ Understdaning About Molecular Polarity. (Disertasi). University of Missouri, Missouri.
Wiji, Liliasari, & Sopandi, W. (2011). The Development of a Mental Model Diagnostic Test in Chemistry. 5th International Seminar of Science Education Science Education Program, Graduate School, Indonesia University of Education.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v19i2.36184
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching
All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616
Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)
View JPMIPA Stats