PENGEMBANGAN MODEL ASESMEN PADA KEGIATAN FIELD TRIP MATA KULIAH EKOLOGI UMUM BERBASIS INKUIRI UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MAHASISWA CALON GURU BIOLOGI
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Penelitian pendahuluan menunjukkan bahwa kuliah lapangan Ekologi Umum belum memiliki model penilaian yang dapat secara optimal menilai semua kegiatan mahasiswa. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengembangkan "model penilaian" dan untuk mengetahui efektivitas dengan mencoba model dalam kegiatan perjalanan ekologi bidang umum Metode penelitian untuk penelitian kami adalah metode penelitian campuran dengan desain eksploratif. Penilaian dilakukan dari tahap persiapan, selama perjalanan Ekologi Umum lapangan, dan pasca-field trip. kinerja siswa ditentukan oleh diri sendiri dan peer-assessment dengan skor kisaran 0-4. Setelah kunjungan lapangan selesai, pendapat siswa yang terjaring oleh kuesioner dan wawancara. mayoritas siswa (> 90%) menyatakan bahwa "model penilaian" yang berusaha optimal adalah untuk menilai kinerja siswa dan kemampuan kerja ilmiah, meningkatkan keterlibatan siswa dalam proses pembelajaran; mempengaruhi rasa tanggung jawab, interaksi sosial , kepercayaan siswa lain, dan komitmen untuk melakukan pekerjaan yang lebih baik siswa mengaku. memahami kriteria penilaian, tetapi ada beberapa siswa yang tidak suka dengan cara ini dan diasumsikan rekan-rekan mereka tidak cukup kompeten untuk menilai, selain masalah "keadilan ", kritik mengurangi rasa percaya diri, dan merasa buruk menilai teman sendiri. Singkatnya, model penilaian cukup efektif dalam menilai kinerja siswa dalam bidang ekologi umum berbasis inkuiri. Hal ini masih perlu dimodifikasi dalam rubrik penilaian dan strategi penilaian.
ABSTRACT
Preliminary research indicates that General Ecology field trip does not have a model of assessment that can be optimally assess all student activities. The purpose of this study was to develop a "model of assessment" and to try to determine the effectiveness of the models in ecology field trip activities common research method for our research is mixed research methods to the design of exploratory. Assessment was carried out from the preparation stage, during General Ecology field trip, and postfield trip. student's performance is determined by self-and peer-assessment with a score range of 0-4. After the site visit was completed, students' opinions were netted by questionnaires and interviews. majority of students (> 90%) stated that "assessment model" which seeks optimal is to assess student performance and scientific work ability, improve student engagement in the learning process; affect sense of responsibility, social interaction, trust other students, and a commitment to do the job the better students admitted. understand the assessment criteria, but there are some students who do not like this way and assumed their colleagues are not competent enough to judge, in addition to the problem of "fairness", criticism reduces confidence, and feel bad judge his own friends. In short, the assessment model is quite effective in assessing student performance in the areas of general ecology-based inquiry. It still needs to be modified in the assessment rubrics and assessment strategies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amprasto, N.Y Rustaman, Surtikanti, K.H & Saefudin (2012). Persepsi Calon Guru dan Guru terhadap field trip dan Refleksi Impelementasinya. Prosiding seminar nasional UNY, Yogyakarta.
Ballantyne,R.,Hughers,K&Mylonas,A.(2002).Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assemssment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,27.5.427-441.
Black & Harrison. (2001). Self and Peerassesmen and Taking Responbility : The Science Student’s Role In Formative Assesment, School Science Review Vol. 83 No. 302 pp.43-49.
Coughlin, P.K.( 2010). “Making Field Trips Count: Collaborating for Meaningful Experiences”. The Social Studies. Washington. 101,( 5),200-211.
Creswell, J.W & Clark, V.L.P.(2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, Sage Publications, London.
Doran, R.,Chan,F.,Tamir,P &Lenhardt, C. (2002). Science educator’s guide tolaboratory assesssment. NSTA press.Virginia.
Lei,S.A.(2010) “Assesment Practice of Advanced Field Ecology Courses”. Education.130(3).404-415.
Patrick,A.O.(2010).” Effect of Field Study on Learning Outcome in Biology” J.Hum.Ecol.31(3),171-177.
Powell, L.A., Tyre, A.J.,Hygnstorm, S.E.,Wedin, D.A.,Hanson, P.R., Kuzila, MS., Swinerhar, J.B. (2010). “Wilderness Serendipity : Planning and Assessing Learning During an Experiental Field Course” NACTA.
Majdoddin, K.( 2010). Peer Assesment : An Alternatif to Traditional Testing, MJAL, Iran.
Noonan & Duncan (2005). Peer and SelfAssesmen in High Schools, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation Vol 10 No.17 , Nov, 2011.
Orsmond, P ( 2004). Self and Peer Assesment, Guidance and Practice in The Bioscience, in Teaching Bioscience Enhancing Learning Series Edited by Stephen Maw, Jackie Wilson & Heather Sears.
Ueneo, M ( 2011). An Item Response Theory For Peer Assesment, The University of Electro Communication, Japan.
Van Den Berg,I.,Admiraal,W & Pilot,A. (2006). Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1),19-36.
Vu,T.T.,&Alba,G. (2007) Students’ Experience of peer assessment in a profesional course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,32(5),541-556
Wenning,C.J.(2007). Assessing inquiry skills as a component of scientific literacy. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 4(2), 21-24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v17i2.36078
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching
All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616
Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)
View JPMIPA Stats