KEMAMPUAN BERHIPOTESIS MAHASISWA FPMIPA IKIP BANDUNG DALAM KAITAN DENGAN POLA DAN TINGKAT BERPIKIRNYA
Abstract
Penelitian ini ingin mengungkapkan profil kemampuan berhipotesis mahasiswa FPMIPA sebagai suatu ketrampilan proses terpadu; serta kaitannya dengan pola berpikir (deduktif-induktif), dan dengan tingkat berpikir (formal, formal awal, transisi, konkret). Menggunakan Tes Kemampuan Perumusan Hipotesis Format Uraian <TKPH-U> dan Format Pilihan <TKPH-P>, serta Tes Kemampuan Penalaran <TKP> yang sudah divalidasi, dijaring kemampuan berhipotesis dan kemampuan penalaran mahasiswa FPMIPA IKIP Bandung angkatan 1987 <n= 85 >. Disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan berhipotesis mahasiswa kurang berkembang, walaupun tingkat berpikir sebagian besar mahasiswa sudah formal. Adanya temuan tentang kemampuan nalar dan berhipotesis calon guru matematika dan calon guru sains yang tidak berbeda memperkuat temuan keseluruhan bahwa ada korelasi positif antara kemampuan berpikir operasi formal dengan kemampuan berbahasa.
Abstract
The study on hipothesizig skills was carried out to provide some description student teacher's competency as one of the integrated process skills, and also its relationship to reasoning abilities and to their level of thinking sets of validated instruments (TKPH-Uand TKPH-P;TKP) and was applying them to 85 fourth year students of FPMIPA-IKIPBandung, The result shoWithat while most student were in formal operational stage, their hypothesizing skills had not been developed. Maths student ability was not significantly different from sciencestudents'. The findings strong relationship between languageand formal operational thinking abilities.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Blake, A.J.D. (1977). The case for science in the primary curriculum: Will the true pro• gressivism please stand up. The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 23 (3): 13-18.
Cahn, S.M. (1970). Philosophicalfoundationsof education. New York: Harper & Row.
Chalmers, A. F. ( 1 980). What is this thing called science? Milton Keynes: The Open Univer• sity Press.
Dahar, R.W. (1985). Kesiapan guru mengajar• kan sains di sekolah dasar ditinjau dari segi pengembangan keterampilan proses sains. Disertasi.
Finley, F.N. (1983). Scienceprocesses.Journal of Researchin ScienceTeaching20(1): 47-
Hanson, N.R. (1971 ). Observationand Explana•
tion. New York: Harper and Row.
Hempel, C.G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Kohlberg, LE. and Mayer, R. (1972). Develop• ment as the aim of education. Harvard Edu• cational Review, 42(4): 449-496.
Langer, J. (1969). Theoriesof Development.
New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Losee, J. (1980). A Historical Introduction to The Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford Uneversity Press
Piaget,J. (1970). Scienceof Educationand the Psychology of the child. New York: Viking Press.
RakaJoni, T. (1980). CaraBe/ajarSiswa Aktip. lmplikasinya terhadap sistem pengajaran. Jakarta: Proyek PengembanganPendidikan Guru. Dep. Dikbud. ·
Wellington, J. (1989). Skills and Approachers in Science Education, A Critical analysis. New York: Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v1i1.34886
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JPMIPA http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpmipa/index is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (JPMIPA) or Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching
All rights reserverd. pISSN 1412-0917 eISSN 2443-3616
Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)
View JPMIPA Stats