Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving Process on Minimum Competency Assessment Test in the Context of Local Wisdom

Lukman Hakim Muhaimin, Rizki Dwi Siswanto, Felix Indra Setiaputra, Muhamat Hidayatul Ridho

Abstract


The ability of students to solve AKM problems is an important thing for teachers to know in teaching. Because the AKM framework is in line with the PISA framework, this study aims to see how the process is carried out by students in solving AKM problems within the local cultural context. Research is a qualitative study with a hermeneutic phenomenological approach. The analysis of 7 junior high school students selected by purposive sampling resulted in findings in the form of the stages of solving AKM problems carried out by students who did not fully use the Polya stage. However, the initial stage follows what Polya said: understanding the problem. When referring to Polya's four steps, the second to fourth steps are performed simultaneously, not standing alone. Students solving skills are important to continue to develop as capital for their future sustainability. Practising problem-solving skills can be done in many ways, including using the stages offered by researchers such as the Polya, Bransford, Good and Brophy, Hohn and Frey, Ormrod, and Sternberg stages.

Keywords


Mathematical problem-solving; Minimum competency Assessment tasks; Local wisdom

Full Text:

PDF

References


Auliya, P. K. (2022). the Implementation of Minimum Competency Assessment (Akm): Opportunities and Challenges for English Teachers. DIDAKTIKA : Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan, 28(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.30587/didaktika.v28i2.3809

Bransford, D, J., & Stein, B. S. (1993). The Ideal Problem Solver. Book Library. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ct2-library/46

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed.). Routledge Falmer.

Compagnucci, F., Gentili, A., Valentini, E., & Gallegati, M. (2019). Robotisation and labour dislocation in the manufacturing sectors of OECD countries: a panel VAR approach. Applied Economics, 51(57), 6127–6138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1659499

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational Research - Planning, Conducting And Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research - Fifth Edition. In AORN Journal (Vol. 62, Issue 1).

D’Ambrosio, U. (2006). Ethnomathematics: Link between traditions and modernity. Sense Publishers.

D’Ambrósio, U. (2005). Society, culture, mathematics, and its teaching. Educação e Pesquisa, 31(1), 99–120. http://www.scielo.br/j/ep/a/TgJbqssD83ytTNyxnPGBTcw/?lang=en

D’Ambrosio, U., & D’Ambrosio, B. S. (2013). Mathematics Education at Teachers College. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 4, 32–38.

Damrongpanit, S. (2022). The Development of Teacher and Student's Book Based on RealisticMathematics Education in Statistics for A package Program. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1075–1088. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Suntonrapot-Damrongpanit/publication/356662582_Effects_of_Mindset_Democratic_Parenting_Teaching_and_School_Environment_on_Global_Citizenship_of_Ninth-grade_Students/links/61a6dda685c5ea51abc0f7b6/Effects-of-Mindset-Dem

Fleming, J. (2018). Recognising and resolving the challenges of being an insider researcher in work-integrated learning. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 19(3), 311–320.

Fleming, P. (2019). Robots and Organization Studies: Why Robots Might Not Want to Steal Your Job. Organisation Studies, 40(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618765568

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. Encyclopedia of Database Systems, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7993-3_80736-1

Fuster Guillen, D. E. (2019). Qualitative Research: Hermeneutical Phenomenological Method. Propósitos y Representaciones, 7(1), 201. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n1.267

Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (1995). Contemporary educational psychology (5th ed.). Longman/Addison Wesley Longman.

Handayani, M., Perdana, N. S., & Ukhlumudin, I. (2021). Readiness of Teachers and Students to Take Minimum Competency Assessments. Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Assessment and Policy (ICEAP 2020), 545(Iceap 2020), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210423.067

Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. State University of New York Press.

Herman, Shara, A. M., Silalahi, T. F., Sherly, & Julyanthry. (2022). Teachers' Attitude towards Minimum Competency Assessment at Sultan Agung Senior High School in Pematangsiantar, Indonesia. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n2p1

Hohn, R. L., & Frey, B. (2002). Heuristic training and performance in elementary mathematical problem-solving. Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596612

Ika, N., Rahmawati, A., & Soebagyo, J. (2022). Implementation of Android-Based Learning Media with Ethnomathematical Approach Batik Nusantara. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal) : Humanities, 5(3), 25177–25184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6561

Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9761-8

Juliani, A. J., & Bastian, A. (2021). Pendidikan Karakter Sebagai Upaya Wujudkan Pelajar Pancasila. Prosiding Seminar Nasional PPS, 1(1), 257–265. https://doi.org/The implementation of AKM in education in Indonesia is expected to spur improvements in the quality of teaching and learning

Knijnik, D. (2007). A PROVA NOS JUÍZOS CÍVEL, PENAL E TRIBUTÁRIO. 2007, 94(81).

Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1988). Problem-Solving: A Handbook for Elementary School Teachers. In Africa's potential for the ecological intensification of agriculture.

Lee, C. Y., & Chen, M. J. (2015). Effects of Polya questioning instruction for geometry reasoning in junior high school. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1547–1561. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1419a

Machromah, I. U., Utami, N. S., Setyaningsih, R., Mardhiyana, D., Wahyu, L., & Fatmawati, S. (2021). Minimum Competency Assessment: Designing Tasks to Support Students' Numeracy. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(14), 3268–3277.

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1995). Designing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.

Mendikbud. (2020). AKM dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran. Pusat Asesmen Dan Pembelajaran Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–37.

Mok, I. A. C., & Clarke, D. J. (2015). Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education. In Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6

Muhtadi, D., Sukirwan, Warsito, & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Sundanese ethnomathematics: Mathematical activities in estimating, measuring, and making patterns. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.2.4055.185-198

Mursalina, D., Marhamah, M., & Retta, A. M. (2021). Development Students Worksheet Using Ethnomathematics-based CTL Approach on SLETV Subject Material for Grade X. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 12(1), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v12i1.28584

Nasir, N. S. (2002). Identity, Goals, and Learning: Mathematics in Cultural Practice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2–3), 213–247. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl04023_6

Nuryadi, N., Kurniawan, L., & Kholifa, I. (2020). Developing mobile learning based on ethnomathematics viewed from adaptive e-learning: Study of two dimensions geometry on Yogyakarta palace's chariot. International Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v2i1.85

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results. I. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/Combined_Executive_Summaries_PISA_2018.pdf

Ormrod, J. E. (2000). Demonstrating the Concepts "Meaningful Learning" and "Elaboration." (Issue 1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED417056

Osman, S., Che Yang, C. N. A., Abu, M. S., Ismail, N., Jambari, H., & Kumar, J. A. (2018). Enhancing Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills through Bar Model Visualisation Technique. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 273–279. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3919

Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it. Anchor Books.

Prahmana, R. C. I. (2022). Ethno ‑ Realistic Mathematics Education : The promising learning approach in the city of culture. SN Social Sciences, 2(12), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00571-w

Prahmana, R. C. I., & D’Ambrosio, U. (2020). Learning geometry and values from patterns: Ethnomathematics on the batik patterns of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.12949.439-456

Purnomo, H., Sa’dijah, C., Hidayanto, E., Sisworo, Permadi, H., & Anwar, L. (2022). Development of Instrument Numeracy Skills Test of Minimum Competency Assessment (MCA) in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 635–648. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15335a

Rahman, A., & Ahmar, A. S. (2016). Exploration of mathematics problem-solving process based on the thinking level of students in junior high school. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 7278–7285.

Risdiyanti, I., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2021). Designing Learning Trajectory of Set Through the Indonesian Shadow Puppets and Mahabharata Stories. Infinity Journal, 10(2), 331. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i2.p331-348

Rosa, M., & Gavarrete, M. E. (2017). An Ethnomathematics Overview: An Introduction. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59220-6_1

Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2013). Ethnomodelling as a Research Lens on Ethnomathematics and Modelling. International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling, 6(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6540-5_10

Sabara, Z., Umam, R., Prianto, K., Junaidi, R., & Rahmat, A. (2021). Anak Krakatau mountain (AKM) causes a rare tsunami phenomenon: Impact around the Sunda strait, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 739(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/739/1/012036

Samo, D. D., Darhim, D., & Kartasasmita, B. (2017). Developing Contextual Mathematical Thinking Learning Model to Enhance Higher-Order Thinking Ability for Middle School Students. International Education Studies, 10(12), 17. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n12p17

Santos-Trigo, M., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2016). The Use of Digital Technology to Frame and Foster Learners' Problem-Solving Experiences. In Posing and Solving Mathematical Problems. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_12

Simamora, R. E., Saragih, S., & Hasratuddin, H. (2018). Improving Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy through Guided Discovery Learning in Local Culture Context. International Electronic Jour. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 61–72.

Smith, S. B., Gill, C. A., Lunt, D. K., & Brooks, M. A. (2009). Regulation of fat and fatty acid composition in beef cattle. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 22(9), 1225–1233. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.r.10

Sternberg, R. J. (2003). What Is an "Expert Student?" Educational Researcher, 32(8), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032008005

Velez-Torres, I., & Vélez Galeano, H. (2019). Plexos conflictivos: una visión territorial e histórica de los conflictos ambientales en la cuenca alta del río. Revista Colombiana de Sociología, 42(1), 177–206.

Winberg, T. M., & Hedman, L. (2008). Student attitudes toward learning, level of pre-knowledge and instruction type in a computer simulation: Effects on flow experiences and perceived learning outcomes. Instructional Science, 36(4), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9030-9

Yadav, S. S., & Jadhav, S. M. (2019). Deep convolutional neural network-based medical image classification for disease diagnosis. Journal of Big Data, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0276-2

Yamtinah, S., Utami, B., Masykuri, M., Mulyani, B., Ulfa, M., & Shidiq, A. S. (2022). Secondary School Science Teacher Response to Minimum Competency Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1075




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jds.v1i1.59021

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal of Didactic Studies https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jds is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

All rights reserverd. p-ISSN 2987-856X e-ISSN 2987-7512

Copyright © Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

Indonesian DDR Development Center
Directorate of Innovation and University Center of Excellence
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

 

Secretariat:
Building of CeO, 6th Floor
Jalan Dr. Setiabudhi 229, Bandung, West Java, 40154 Indonesia