Examining Students’ Metacognitive Awareness in Japanese Language Learning: A Survey-Based Study

Laksmi Asmarani, Frida Philiyanti

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to investigate metacognitive awareness among students enrolled in the second semester of Japanese language courses to assess their self-regulated learning performance. Metacognitive awareness plays a crucial role in students' academic success, as it enables them to monitor, evaluate, and regulate their learning processes effectively. By fostering metacognitive awareness, students can develop greater autonomy, become more strategic in their learning approaches, and enhance their overall academic performance. This study is grounded in two key theoretical frameworks: the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) developed by Schraw and Dennison, which provides a comprehensive measure of students' metacognitive knowledge and regulation, and the metacognitive level theory proposed by Perkins and Swartz, which categorizes learners based on their ability to engage in metacognitive thinking. A survey research method was employed, utilizing the MAI questionnaire as the primary data collection instrument. The survey was administered to a total of 69 students, and the collected data were analyzed to determine the distribution of metacognitive awareness levels among participants. The results revealed that most students were classified at the strategic use level. This indicates that the majority of students possess the ability to consciously select and apply appropriate learning strategies to solve academic problems effectively. These findings suggest that while students demonstrate a solid foundation in metacognitive awareness, further instructional interventions may be beneficial in helping them advance to higher levels of metacognitive control and self-regulated learning.


Keywords


Japanese language; Metacognitive Awareness; Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI); Metacognitive Level.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asy’ari, M., Ikhsan, M., & Muhali. (2018). Validitas instrumen karakterisasi kemampuan metakognisi mahasiswa calon guru fisika [Validity of the characterization instrument for metacognitive abilities of prospective physics teacher students]. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 6(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v6i1.955

Fauzi, A., & Sa’diyah, W. (2019). The Metacognition of Pre-Service Biology Teachers: Awareness, Skills, Understanding, and Practices. 6th International Conference on Community Development, 349, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccd-19.2019.8

Febrianti, E. A. (2020). Desain instrumen tes untuk mengukur metakognisi peserta didik pada materi asam basa. CiE, 9(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.21009/JRPK.091.01

Flavell, J. H. (1978). Metacognitive development. Structural/process theories of complex human behavior, 213-245.

Habibi, A. A., Mustofa, R. F., & Ardiansyah, D. (2020). Perbandingan Metakognitif pada Peserta Didik yang Tinggal di Asrama dan Non Asrama pada Pembelajaran Biologi [Metacognitive Comparison of Students Living in Dormitories and Non-Dormitories in Biology Learning]. BIOMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 10(1), 69-79.https://doi.org/10.26877/bioma.v10i1.6291

Hosseinilai, F., & Kasaei, M. A. (2013). The effect of using cognitive and meta cognitive strategy on creativity level academic achievement of high school students. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 7(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjhss.v3i1.1780

Hiryanto. (2017). Pedagogi, Andragogi dan Heutagogi serta Implikasinya dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat [Pedagogy, Andragogy and Heutagogy and their Implications in Community Empowerment]. Dinamika Pendidikan, 22, 65–71.

Kartikasari, D. (2022). Berpikir Analisis Melalui Self Question [Analytical Thinking Through Self Questions]. Lombok: P4I.

Maulana. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Konsep Peluang: Sebuah Gagasan Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Metakognitif [The Basics of the Concept of Probability: A Learning Idea with a Metacognitive Approach]. Bandung: UPI Press.

Perkins, D., & Swartz, R. (1992). The nine basics of teaching thinking. If minds matter: A foreword to the future, 2, 53-69.

Philiyanti, F., & Rismorlita, C. E. (2021). 21st Century Skills-Based Beginner Level Reading Teaching Materials: A Need Analysis Result. Jurnal Taiyou, 2(1), 54-76.

Putera, D. B. R. A., Hidayah, R., Suarningtyas, S., & Mitasari, R. A. (2021). Profil Keterampilan Metakognitif Peserta Didik di Universitas Trunojoyo Madura pada Program Studi Pendidikan IPA [Metacognitive Skills Profile of Students at Trunojoyo University Madura in the Science Education Study Program]. JPPMS: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 5(2), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppms.v5n2.p84-91

Rinaldi. (2017). Kesadaran Metakognitif. [Metacognitive Awareness] Jurnal Matematika, 8(1), 79–87.

Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional science, 26(1), 113-125.

Schraw, G. (2009). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and learning, 4, 33-45.

Schraw, G., & Denisson, R. S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

Sele, Y. (2023). Buku Ajar Belajar dan Pembelajaran [Teaching and Learning Textbook]. Pekalongan: NEM.

Sholihah, M., & Sofiyana, M. S. (2022). Analisis kesadaran metakognitif bagi calon guru di Universitas Islam Balitar [Analysis of metacognitive awareness for prospective teachers at Balitar Islamic University]. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12(3), 202. https://doi.org/10.17977/um052v12i3p202-206

Sophianingtyas, F., & Sugiarto, B. (2013). Identifikasi level metakognitif siswa dalam memecahkan masalah materi perhitungan Kimia [Identification of students’ metacognitive levels in solving Chemical calculation material problems]. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 2(1), 21–27.

Sukaisih, R., & Muhali. (2014). Meningkatkan kesadaran metakognitif dan hasil belajar siswa melalui penerapan pembelajaran Problem Solving [Improving metacognitive awareness and student learning outcomes through the application of Problem Solving learning]. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 2(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v2i1.803

Zakiah, N. E. (2020). Level kemampuan metakognitif siswa dalam pembelajaran Matematika berdasarkan gaya kognitif [The level of students’ metacognitive abilities in learning Mathematics based on cognitive style]. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 32–147. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v7i2.30458




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/japanedu.v9i2.61727

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 JAPANEDU: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Bahasa Jepang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Published by:
Department of Japanese Language Education, Faculty of Language and Literature Education  
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Online ISSN:
2528-5548
 

 

JAPANEDU: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Bahasa Jepang (e-ISSN:2528-5548) lisenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internasional (CC BY-SA 4.0)