Email this article 
A Review on Rotating Biological Contactors
Abstract
Rotating biological contactors (RBC) is a wastewater treatment process that provides a both acceptable effluent quality and organic removal efficiency at a comparatively very low costs. It is highly attractive due to simplicity of operation, low sludge production, small foot-print, low maintenance, and low operational cost. Complete nitrification/denitrification can be achieved by varying the disk submergence level and operating the process under both anaerobic/anoxic conditions in a single unit. In this review, pros and cons of RBC are discussed in detail along with the factors affecting its performances. Organic and hydraulic loading and hydraulic retention time are the main parameters followed by additional parameters such as rotational speed, media, disk submergence, dissolved oxygen level, influent and effluent characteristics, and step-feeding in affecting the performance of an RBC system. RBC has shown promising results for the removal of biodegradable matter, nitrogen and phosphorous removal. The approaches for hybridization of biological processes to improve their overall performance are also review. Such success story is assess so explore possibility of developing RBC based hybrid processes. Hybrid RBC can be form from in-combination with other processes for minimizing energy requirements and maximizing the efficiency of the system.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akhondi, E., Zamani, F., Tng, K. H., Leslie, G., Krantz, W. B., Fane, A. G., and Chew, J. W. (2017). The Performance and Fouling Control of Submerged Hollow Fiber (HF) Systems: A Review. Applied Sciences, 7(8), 765.
Al-Ahmady, K. K. (2005). Effect of organic loading on rotating biological contactor efficiency. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2(3), 469-477.
Alemzadeh, I., and Vossoughi, M. (2001). Biodegradation of toluene by an attached biofilm in a rotating biological contactor. Process Biochemistry, 36(8-9), 707-711.
Andreottola, G., Foladori, P., Gatti, G., Nardelli, P., Pettena, M., and Ragazzi, M. (2003). Upgrading of a small overloaded activated sludge plant using a MBBR system. Journal of Environmental Science and Health: Part A, 38(10), 2317-2328.
Anshar, A. M., Taba, P., and Raya, I. (2016). Kinetic and Thermodynamics Studies the Adsorption of Phenol on Activated Carbon from Rice Husk Activated by ZnCl2. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 1(1), 47-60.
Bilad, M., Arafat, H. A., and Vankelecom, I. F. (2014). Membrane technology in microalgae cultivation and harvesting: a review. Biotechnology Advances, 32(7), 1283-1300.
Bilad, M., Baten, M., Pollet, A., Courtin, C., Wouters, J., Verbiest, T., and Vankelecom, I. F. J. (2016). A novel In-situ Enzymatic Cleaning Method for Reducing Membrane Fouling in Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs). Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 1(1), 1-22.
Bilad, M. R. (2016). Module-Scale Simulation of Forward Osmosis Module-Part A: Plate-and-Frame. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 1(2), 249-261.
Bilad, M. R. (2017). Membrane bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment: principles, challanges and future research directions. Indonesian journal of science and technology, 2(1), 97-123.
Bilad, M. R., Declerck, P., Piasecka, A., Vanysacker, L., Yan, X., and Vankelecom, I. F. (2011). Treatment of molasses wastewater in a membrane bioreactor: influence of membrane pore size. Separation and Purification Technology, 78(2), 105-112.
Bilad, M. R., Mezohegyi, G., Declerck, P., and Vankelecom, I. F. (2012). Novel magnetically induced membrane vibration (MMV) for fouling control in membrane bioreactors. Water Research, 46(1), 63-72.
Chan, R. T., and Stenstrom, M. K. (1981). Use of the rotating biological contactor for appropriate technology wastewater treatment: UC Appropriate Technology Program, University of California, Davis.
Cortez, S., Teixeira, P., Oliveira, R., and Mota, M. (2008). Rotating biological contactors: a review on main factors affecting performance. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 7(2), 155-172.
Costley, S., and Wallis, F. (2000). Effect of flow rate on heavy metal accumulation by rotating biological contactor (RBC) biofilms. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 24(4), 244-250.
Di Trapani, D., Christensso, M., and Ødegaard, H. (2011). Hybrid activated sludge/biofilm process for the treatment of municipal wastewater in a cold climate region: a case study. Water Science and Technology, 63(6), 1121-1129.
Doman, J. (1929). Results of operation of experimental contact filter with partially submerged rotating plates. Sewage Works Journal, 555-560.
Findlay, G. (1993). The selection and design of rotating biological contactors and reed beds for small sewage treatment plants. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Maritime and Energy, 101(4), 237-246.
Grelier, P., Rosenberger, S., and Tazi-Pain, A. (2006). Influence of sludge retention time on membrane bioreactor hydraulic performance. Desalination, 192(1-3), 10-17.
Griffin, P., and Findlay, G. (2000). Process and engineering improvements to rotating biological contactor design. Water Science and Technology, 41(1), 137-144.
Gupta, S., and Bhardwaj, N. K. (2016). Advances in the Treatment of Pulp and Paper Mill Wastewater. Environmental Waste Management, 33, 47-72.
Hanhan, O., Orhon, D., Krauth, K., and Günder, B. (2005). Evaluation of denitrification potential of rotating biological contactors for treatment of municipal wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 51(11), 131-139.
Hassard, F., Biddle, J., Cartmell, E., Jefferson, B., Tyrrel, S., and Stephenson, T. (2015). Rotating biological contactors for wastewater treatment – A review. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 94, 285-306.
Hemmati, A., Dolatabad, M. M., Naeimpoor, F., Pak, A., and Mohammdi, T. (2012). Effect of hydraulic retention time and temperature on submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) performance. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 29(3), 369-376.
Hoyland, G., Vale, P., Rogalla, F., and Jones, M. (2010). A new approach to nutrient removal using the HYBACS process. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, 2010(7), 81-94.
Israni, S. H., Koli, S. S., Patwardhan, A. W., Melo, J. S., and D'souza, S. F. (2002). Phenol degradation in rotating biological contactors. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology: International Research in Process, Environmental and Clean Technology, 77(9), 1050-1057.
Janczukowicz, W., and Klimiuk, E. (1992). The influence of the raw wastes dosing system on technological parameters of the rotating biological disc (RBD) process. Bioresource Technology, 42(3), 241-245.
Kapoor, A., Kuiper, A., Bedard, P., and Gould, W. (2003). Use of a rotating biological contactor for removal of ammonium from mining effluents. ejmp and ep (European Journal of Mineral Processing and Environmental Protection), 3(1), 88-100.
Lee, J., Ahn, W.-Y., and Lee, C.-H. (2001). Comparison of the filtration characteristics between attached and suspended growth microorganisms in submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Research, 35(10), 2435-2445.
Leiknes, T., and Ødegaard, H. (2007). The development of a biofilm membrane bioreactor. Desalination, 202(1-3), 135-143.
Majumder, P. S., and Gupta, S. (2007). Removal of chlorophenols in sequential anaerobic–aerobic reactors. Bioresource Technology, 98(1), 118-129.
Mba, D., Bannister, R., and Findlay, G. (1999). Mechanical redesign of the rotating biological contactor. Water Research, 33(18), 3679-3688.
Mertens, M., Bilad, M. R., Gebreyohannes, A. Y., Marbelia, L., and Vankelecom, I. (2018). Membrane development for improved performance of a magnetically induced vibration system for anaerobic sludge filtration. Separation and Purification Technology, 200, 120-129.
Najafpour, G., Yieng, H. A., Younesi, H., and Zinatizadeh, A. (2005). Effect of organic loading on performance of rotating biological contactors using palm oil mill effluents. Process Biochemistry, 40(8), 2879-2884.
Najafpour, G., Zinatizadeh, A., and Lee, L. (2006). Performance of a three-stage aerobic RBC reactor in food canning wastewater treatment. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 30(3), 297-302.
Nandiyanto, A. B., Putra, Z. A., Andika, R., Bilad, M. R., Kurniawan, T., Zulhijah, R., and Hamidah, I. (2017). Porous activated carbon particles from rice straw waste and their adsorption properties. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 12, 1-11.
Nandiyanto, A. B. D., Zaen, R., and Oktiani, R. (2018). Working volume in high-energy ball-milling process on breakage characteristics and adsorption performance of rice straw ash. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 43(11), 6057-6066.
Ødegaard, H., Rusten, B., and Westrum, T. (1994). A new moving bed biofilm reactor-applications and results. Water Science and Technology, 29(10-11), 157-165.
Patwardhan, A. (2003). Rotating biological contactors: A review. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 42(10), 2035-2051.
Peavy, D., Brunner, M., Duckworth, W., Hooker, C., and Frank, B. (1985). Receptor binding and biological potency of several split forms (conversion intermediates) of human proinsulin. Studies in cultured IM-9 lymphocytes and in vivo and in vitro in rats. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 260(26), 13989-13994.
Pebriyanti, G., Zhu, R., and Rehiara, A. B. (2016). Sludge Dewatering Process Control Using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Square (PLS). Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 1(1), 61-73.
Poon, C. P., Chao, Y.-L., and Mikucki, W. J. (1979). Factors controlling rotating biological contactor performance. Water Pollution Control Federation, 51(3), 601-611.
Rajasulochana, P., and Preethy, V. (2016). Comparison on efficiency of various techniques in treatment of waste and sewage water–A comprehensive review. Resource Efficient Technologies, 2(4), 175-184.
Ramsay, J., Shin, M., Wong, S., and Goode, C. (2006). Amaranth decoloration by Trametes versicolor in a rotating biological contacting reactor. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 33(9), 791.
Randall, C. W., and Sen, D. (1996). Full-scale evaluation of an integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) process for enhanced nitrogen removal. Water Science and Technology, 33(12), 155-162.
Rodgers, M., and Zhan, X.-M. (2003). Moving-medium biofilm reactors. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 2(2-4), 213-224.
Safa, M., Alemzadeh, I., and Vossoughi, M. (2014). Biodegradability of oily wastewater using rotating biological contactor combined with an external membrane. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 12(1), 117.
Saikaly, P., and Ayoub, G. (2003). Ammonia nitrogen removal in step-feed rotating biological contactors. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 150(1-4), 177-191.
Sayess, R. R., Saikaly, P. E., El-Fadel, M., Li, D., and Semerjian, L. (2013). Reactor performance in terms of COD and nitrogen removal and bacterial community structure of a three-stage rotating bioelectrochemical contactor. Water Research, 47(2), 881-894.
Sirianuntapiboon, S. (2006). Treatment of wastewater containing Cl2 residue by packed cage rotating biological contactor (RBC) system. Bioresource technology, 97(14), 1735-1744.
Sirianuntapiboon, S., and Chuamkaew, C. (2007). Packed cage rotating biological contactor system for treatment of cyanide wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 98(2), 266-272.
Surampalli, R. Y., and Baumann, E. R. (1997). Role of supplemental aeration in improving overloaded first-stage RBC performance. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 98(1-2), 1-15.
Teixeira, P., and Oliveira, R. (2001). Denitrification in a closed rotating biological contactor: effect of disk submergence. Process Biochemistry, 37(4), 345-349.
Trikoilidou, E., Samiotis, G., Bellos, D., and Amanatidou, E. (2016). Sustainable operation of a biological wastewater treatment plant. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 161(1), 012093.
Vanysacker, L., Declerck, P., Bilad, M., and Vankelecom, I. (2014). Biofouling on microfiltration membranes in MBRs: Role of membrane type and microbial community. Journal of Membrane Science, 453, 394-401.
Wang, Z., Wu, Z., Yin, X., and Tian, L. (2008). Membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) under sub-critical flux operation: membrane foulant and gel layer characterization. Journal of Membrane Science, 325(1), 238-244.
Ware, A., Pescod, M., and Storch, B. (1990). Evaluation of alternatives to conventional disc support media for rotating biological contactors. Water Science and Technology, 22(1-2), 113-117.
Wijekoon, K. C., Visvanathan, C., and Abeynayaka, A. (2011). Effect of organic loading rate on VFA production, organic matter removal and microbial activity of a two-stage thermophilic anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technology, 102(9), 5353-5360.
Wiszniowski, J., Robert, D., Surmacz-Gorska, J., Miksch, K., and Weber, J. (2006). Landfill leachate treatment methods: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 4(1), 51-61.
Yan, X., Bilad, M. R., Gerards, R., Vriens, L., Piasecka, A., and Vankelecom, I. F. (2012). Comparison of MBR performance and membrane cleaning in a single-stage activated sludge system and a two-stage anaerobic/aerobic (A/A) system for treating synthetic molasses wastewater. Journal of Membrane Science, 394, 49-56.
Yeom, I.-T., Nah, Y.-M., and Ahn, K.-H. (1999). Treatment of household wastewater using an intermittently aerated membrane bioreactor. Desalination, 124(1-3), 193-203.
Yoon, S.-H., Kim, H.-S., and Yeom, I.-T. (2004). The optimum operational condition of membrane bioreactor (MBR): Cost estimation of aeration and sludge treatment. Water Research, 38(1), 37-46.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v4i2.18181
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology is published by UPI.
View My Stats