REVITALIZATION MODEL OF ETHNIC SETTLEMENT TO PRESERVE CULTURAL HERITAGE AND SUPPORT TOURISM IN SURAKARTA

- Sariyatun

Abstract


The main aim of this research is to formulate a revitalizing model of ethnic settlement through the effort of preserving cultural heritage and supporting community-based tourism in Surakarta. It is a qualitative research which uses primary and secondary sources. The research data is gathered through in-depth interviews, guided group discussions, field observations, and the close reading method [metode simak]. The data was obtained through the triangulation method. The data is then analyzed by using the interactive analysis technique. The results of the research are as follows: First, the kinds of ethnic settlements which still survive are Baluwarti, Kauman, Laweyan, Pecinan in Balong and Kampung Arab Pasar Kliwon. Second, writings on the variety of ethnic settlements in Surakarta are still limited. Therefore, it is necessary to enhance this community-based ethnic settlement through writings so that the community would be better known and be able to benefit from the existing tourism settlement projects. Third, the final model is formulated, i.e. the final Interpretation-Based and Benefit-Oriented Model which is shortened as IBaBOM. This means that what is being constructed is a revitalizing model based on interpretative writings. The objective is to secure benefits for Surakarta.
The elements to formulate this model are the potentials, problems, and stakeholders. The potentials refer to the attractions, accessibilities, amenities, and activities. Problems cover matters related to diversifications, collaborations, human resource, thought patterns, and promotion. Stakeholders comprise of the community, the government, higher learning institutions, private enterprises, non-governmental organizations, and associations or “paguyuban.” The benefits are the various outcomes which can be enjoyed by all the stakeholders vis-a-vis the process of the empowerment of ethnic communities and the development of culture based tourism in Surakata.
According to the Intepretation-Based and Benefit-Oriented Model or (IBaBOM), both the community and the tourists will have knowledge of the history and culture of the ethnic community. The ethnic community as well as the surrounding communities will derive benefits or profits from the undertaking.

Keywords


Revitalisation, Interpretation, Ethnic Community

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aryadipura, T. (1984). Sejarah Ki Ageng Henis- Kyai Ageng Laweyan, Urip-Urip (Penyunting : Satosa, Soewito). Surakarta: Museum Radya Pustaka.

Aryadipra, T. (1991).” Sejarah Terjadinya Kampung Laweyan,” Sebuah Catatan Pribadi. Surakarta: Museum Radya Pustaka

Bromley. (1994). Interpretation in Countryside Recreation: A Handbook for Managers. London: E & FN Spon.

Borley, L. (1992). “Principles For Revitalizing the Cultural Heritage” in Universal

Tourism Enriching Or Degrading Culture? Yogyakarta: Proceedings on The International Conference On Cultural Tourism. Gadjah-Mada University.

Dann, G. M. (1996). The Language of Tourism: A Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Wallingford: Cab International.

Fawcett, J. (1997). Ecotourism is Characterized by High Levels of Interpretation and Education. A disccussion paper at The Ecotourism Class. The Tourism Department, James Cook University of North Queensland Australia.

Hall, C,M. (1996). Introduction to Tourism in Australia: Impacts, Planning and Development, Melbourne: Longman.

Koerver.(1985). Sarekat Islam Ratu Adil? Jakarta: Graffity Press.

Houben Vincent. J.H. (2002). Keraton dan Kompen.Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University

Kalinowski & Weiler. (1992). Educational travel. In Weiler, B & Hall, C. M (eds). Special Interest Tourism. London: Belhaven.

Kuntowijoyo. (2001). “The making of a Modern Urban Ecology,” Social and Economic History of Surakarta, 1900-1915”, Lembaran Sejarah Vol: 3 No.1, 2001, Yogyakarta: Jurusan Sejarah Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Kusumastuti. (2004). Sejarah dan Morfologi Kota Konflik. Makalah dalam Seminar Solo Heritage Society tgl 21Agustus 2004 di Hotel Agas Surakarta.

Laretna. T. ”Advokasi Pelestarian Pusaka Di Solo,” Makalah yang disampaikan dalam Seminar Pusaka Budaya di Solo 13 Januari 2007.

Larson, George, D. (1990). Masa Menjelang Revolusi Kraton dan Kehidupan Politik di Surakarta 1912-1915. Yogyakarta: UGM Press.

Musyawaroh. (2004). Strategi Pengembangan Wisata Budaya Pada Kawasan Bersejarah. Surakarta: LPPM.

Ramdhon, A. (2007). Merayakan Negara Mematrikan Tradisi Transformasi Struktur dan Dinamika Politik, Agama dan Ekonomi di Surakarta. Yogyakarta: UGM.

Sariyatun. (2004). Usaha Batik Masyarakat Cina di Vorstenlanden Surakarta. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University Press.

Sayid. R.M. (2001). Babad Sala (Alih Bahasa Dra Darweni). Surakarta: Museum Rekso Pustaka.

Sidharta. (1989) Konversi Lingkungan dan Bangunan Bersejarah di Kota Surakarta. Yogyakarta: UGM Press

Soedarmono. (2004). “Sejarah dan Morfologi Kota Konflik Solo:dari Periode Kolonial-Orde Baru “Solo Morfologi Kota Kerusuhan.” Makalah disampaikan dalam Seminar Solo Heritage Society, tgl 21Agustus 2004 di Hotel Agas Surakarta.

Tirtopranoto & Mardisuwignya. (t.t), Sejarah Kutha Surakarta, Kraton Surakarta, Bengawan Surakarta, Gunung Lawu. Surakarta: Toko Buku Pelajar.

Yoeti, O.A. (1996). Pengantar Ilmu pariwisata. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka.

Yuwono, B . (2000). Etnis Cina di Surakarta 1890-1927. Dalam Lembaran Sejarah Vol 2. No 1. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Sastra,UGM.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/historia.v11i1.12135

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Historia: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah 


INDEXED

   

 

TOOLS

     

 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Alamat Redaksi: Gedung Numan Soemantri, FPIPS UPI, Departemen Pendidikan Sejarah, Lantai 2, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No 229 Bandung, 40154

 

View "Jurnal Historia" Stats