Helping Students Make Sense of New Material Through the “I Notice I Wonder” Method

Iis Husnul Hotimah, Encep Supriatna

Abstract


When a student becomes an active doer during the learning process, the advantage of their mindset can be realized. The understanding process started when the teacher created a class atmosphere that attracted student’s curiosity. By throwing questions such as "What do you notice?" and "What do you wonder?", the teacher helps students to look at problems from a wider angle. This will improve students’ confidence, reflective skills, and student’s involvement, it reveals that the aim of studying is not only for completing assignments but also for finding strategies to overcome problems. This will result in a classroom space full of student’s thoughts and ideas that contain curiosity. Sometimes, the process of apperception in the learning process is not fully utilized by the teacher to help students connect the relationship between previous and future material. Thus, students frequently tend to feel confused in understanding the material as a whole. The I Notice I Wonder method was invented to facilitate and ease teachers in utilizing the apperception process as a means to involve students to be a thinker and actor during active learning, and also to commit authority over students to be active doers by appreciating their opinions and ideas. This study focuses on the importance of the teacher’s role during the apperception process in order to help students understand the connectedness between topics of materials.


Keywords


Apperception Process, “I Notice I Wonder” Method, New Material

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adey, P. & Shayer, M. (1993). An Exploration of Long-Term Far-Transfereffects Following an Extended Intervention Program in The High Schoolscience Curriculum. Cognition and Instruction. Vol. 11(1). P. 1–29.

Bandura A (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review. Vol.84. p. 191–215

Donovan, M.S. & Bransford, J.D. (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics and science in the classroom. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.

Lee, P. J. (2005). Putting principles into practice: Understanding history. Washington DC: National Academic Press.

Perkins, D.N. & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound?. Educational Researcher Vol. 18, p. 16–25.

Schraw G, Crippen K, & Hartley K. (2006). Promoting Self-Regulation Inscience Education: Metacognition as Part Of a Broader Perspective on Learning. Research in Science Education. Vol. 36. P. 111–139.

Schraw, G (1998). Promoting general metacognition awareness. Instructional Science. Vol. 26 (1). P. 113–125.

Sternberg, R.J. (1998). Metacognition, abilities and developing expertise: What makes and expert student?. Instructional Science. Vol. 26(1-2), p. 127-140.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D, dan Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tanner, K.D. (2012). Promoting Student Metacognition. CBE—Life Sciences Education. Vol 11, p. 113-120.

https://www.nctm.org/noticeandwonder/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ebj.v6i2.61239

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 EduBasic Journal: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This journal is indexed by