Utilizing PhET simulation in a guided inquiry-based virtual biology lab to improve science literacy among junior high school students

Median Agus Priadi, Dewi Lengkana, Diana Yosita

Abstract


This study aims to determine the effect of implementing a guided inquiry model with assistance PhET simulation as virtual laboratory towards improving students' scientific literacy skills. This quasi-experimental study used a Pretest Posttest Non-Equivalent Control Group design. The population consisted of 5 classes with a total of 134 students, while the sample was taken from two classes totaling 51 students, selected using the Purposive Sampling technique. The experimental class was given treatment using a guided inquiry model assisted by Virtual Laboratory PhET Simulation, while the control class used a guided inquiry model. Data on students' scientific literacy skills were obtained from pretest and posttest scores. To determine the increase in scientific literacy, an N-gain test was conducted. The results of the N-gain test showed an average increase in the experimental class's scientific literacy skills of 0.53 (moderate category) and the control class of 0.28 (low category). Furthermore, an Independent Sample T-Test was conducted to determine the effect of variable X on variable Y, obtained Sig.0.00. Based on the Independent Sample T-Test, it is known that there is an effect of implementing a guided inquiry model assisted by Virtual Laboratory PhET Simulation on improving scientific literacy skills. The effect size test was also conducted and obtained a value of 1.78 with an interpretation of the effectiveness level in the large category. Thus, it can be concluded that the implementation of the guided inquiry model assisted by the Virtual Laboratory PhET Simulation has a significant effect on improving students' scientific literacy skills.


Keywords


Science Literacy Skills; Guided Inquiry; Virtual Laboratory; PhET Simulation

References


Aina, Q., & Hariyono, E (2023). Application of PhET Simulations in Physics Learning to Improve Science Literacy Skills of Grade X High School Students. Journal of Educational Sciences and Learning, 1(2), 56-65.

Babich, A., & Mavrommatis, K. (2004), Virtual laboratory concept for engineering education. In International Conference on Engineering Education and Research "Progress Through Partnership (pp. 1043-1050))

Erdani, Y., Hakim, L., & Lia, L. (2020). The Effect of Guided Inquiry Learning Model on Students' Science Literacy Skills at SMP Negeri 35 Palembang. Journal of Physics Education and Technology, 6(1), 45-52.

Fatmawati, T., & Pertiwi, P. (2024). The Effect of Inquiry Learning Model Assisted by Phet Simulation on Students' Science Literacy OMEGA: Journal of Education and Physical Science, 3(1), 95-102.

Gormally, C, Brickman, P, Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. (2009). Effects of Inquiry-Based Learning on Students' Science Literacy Skills and Confidence. International journal for the scholarship of teaching and learning, 3(2), 16.

Haerani, SAS, Setiadi, D., & Rasmi, DAC (2020). The Influence of the Free Inquiry Model on Science Literacy Skills. Pijar MIPA Journal, 15(2), 140-144.

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International journal of environmental and science education, 4(3), 275-288.

Jeramat, E., Ningsi, GP, Raga, P., & Kurnila, VS (2024). Transformation of Assessment in High School: Strengthening Science and Environmental Literacy for Grade X Students. Bio-Lectura: Journal of Biology Education, 11(1), 139-151.

Kristyowati, R., & Purwanto, A. (2019). Science Literacy Learning Through Environmental Utilization. Scholaria: Journal of Education and Culture 9(2): 183–91.

Novita, M., Rusilowati, A., Susilo, S., & Marwoto, P. (2021). Meta-analysis of students' scientific literacy in Indonesia. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 10(3), 209-215.

OECD (2006) OECD Publishing Pamal Student Assessment (PISA) results from PISA 2015 Paris

OECD (201820 OECD Publishing Hamal Student Assessment (PISA) results from PISA Paris

OECD (2022) POECD Publisternational Student Assessment (PISA) results from PISA 2022.

Perkins, K., Adams, W., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N., Reid, S., Wieman, C., & LeMaster, R. (2006). PhET: Interactive simulations for teaching and learning physics. The physics teacher, 44(1), 18-23.

Pierce. R. & Fox, J (2012) Vodcasts And Active-Learning Exercises In A "Flipped Classroom" Model Of A Renal Pharmacotherapy Module. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 76(10), 196

Pitaloka, HV, Sofya, E., & Efkar, T. (2020). The Effectiveness of Guided Inquiry Learning Model to Improve Science Literacy Skills and Students Self Efficacy on AcidBase Materials. Journal of Chemical Education and Learning, 9(3), 139-152.

Pratiwi, SN, Cari, C., & Aminah, NS (2019) 21st century science learning with students' scientific literacy. Journal of Physics Materials and Learning, 9(1), 34-42

Qahfi, BA (2022). Application of Guided Inquiry Learning Model Assisted by PhET Simulation on Students' Critical Thinking Skills at SMAN 1 Donggo. Journal of Community Service for Master of Science Education, 5(2), 133-139.

Rahmawati, LN, & Fianti, F. (2023). Analysis Of The Effect Of Phet Simulations Learning Media On Students' Concept Understanding Of Sma Negeri 1 Ungaran. In Proceedings of the National Physics Seminar (Vol. 35, pp. 361-369).

Rambe, YA, Silalahi, A., & Sudrajat, A. (2020). The effect of guided inquiry learning model and critical thinking skills on learning outcomes. In The 5th Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership. AISTEEL 2020. (pp. 151-155).

Saudelli, M. G., Kleiv, R., Davies, J., Jungmark, M., & Mueller, R. (2021). PhET simulations in undergraduate physics: Constructivist learning theory in practicee. Brock Education Journal, 31(1).

Sellberg, C., Nazarı, Z., & Solberg, M. (2024) Virtual Laboratories in STEM Higher Education: A Scoping Review, Nordic Journal of Systematic Reviews in Education. (2), 58-75

Setyowati, AP, Gunarhadi, G., & Musadad, AA (2022, May). Profile and Factors Influencing Students' Scientific Literacy. In Journal of International Conference Proceedings (Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 314-323).

Sharkawy, A. (2010). A Quest To Improve. Science & Children, 48(4).

Sukma, Komariyah, L., & Syam, M (2016), The Influence of Guided Inquiry Learning Model and Motivation on Students' Physics Learning Outcomes. Saintifika Jurusan PMIPA, 8(1), 59-63

Sylviani, S., Permana, F C., & Utomo, RG (2020). PHET Simulation as an Elementary School Student Assistance Tool in the Teaching and Learning Process of Mathematics Subjects. Multimedia Education Journal, 2(1), 1-10

Taibu, R., Mataka, Ll., & Shekoyan, V. (2021). Using PhET simulations to improve scientific skills and attitudes of community college students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 9(3), 353-370

Tillah, NF, & Subekti, H. (2025). Analysis Of Science Literacy Ability Of Junior High School Students Based On Science Literacy Indicators And Levels. Edusaintek: Journal of Education, Science and Technology, 12(1), 137-154.

Wieman, C.E., Adams, W.K., & Perkins, K.K. (2008). PhET: Simulations that enhance learning. Science, 322(5902), 682-683.

Wuryaningsih & Suharno. (2014). “Implementation of Physics Learning with PhET Simulation Media on the Subject of Force to Improve Learning Outcomes of Class VIIIA Students of SMPN 6 Yogyakarta”. Scientific Journal, Vol 1, No. 1, pp. 400-402.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v8i1.80287

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Web
Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter View AIJBE Stats

Creative Commons License AIJBE is under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License