Corporate Financial Performance and Tax Avoidance in High-Tech Industries

Meliani Mukti, Khairanis Yulita, Mochamad Chairul Ihsan

Abstract


This study investigated the correlation between tax avoidance, corporate financial performance, and high-tech industries (HTI) characteristics in publicly listed industries in Southeast Asia. The Generalized Least Square (GLS) was administered to test the hypotheses in 666 industry-years from 74 publicly listed industries in Southeast Asia from 2013-2021, including nine from Indonesia, 23 from Malaysia, 11 from Singapore, five from the Philippines, and 26 from Thailand. The results support all the hypotheses by showing a positive influence of corporate financial performance on tax avoidance and was found to be more vital for industries in high-tech industries. It suggested that high-performing sectors in Southeast Asia had more power to influence the political process for their benefit.  Profitable high-tech companies are more likely than the industry to use tax system uncertainties to minimize their tax obligations. These results support political power hypotheses rather than political cost hypotheses. Moreover, political power was more pronounced in high-tech industries, which the government saw as more valuable. This study investigated different geographical areas that might be neglected by previous studies and industry characteristics suspected to contribute significantly to the strong effects of corporate financial performance on tax avoidance.


Keywords


Corporate financial performance, High-tech industries, Political cost hypotheses, Political power hypotheses, Tax avoidance.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abid, S., and Dammak, S. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance: the case of French companies. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 20(3/4), 618-638.

Bubanić, M., and Šimović, H. (2021). Determinants of the effective tax burden of companies in the Telecommunications activities in the Republic of Croatia. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, 24(2), 59–76.

Cao, J., and Cui, Y. (2017). An alternative view on determinants of the effective tax rate: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53(5), 1001–1014.

Chun, H.M., Kang, G.I.J., Lee, S.H., and Yoo, Y.K. (2020). Corporate tax avoidance and cost of equity capital: international evidence. Applied Economics, 52(29), 3123-3137.

Desai, M. A., and Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1), 145–179.

Fernández-Rodríguez, E., García-Fernández, R., and Martínez-Arias, A. (2021). Business and institutional determinants of effective tax rate in emerging economies. Economic Modelling, 94(September 2019), 692–702.

Fernandez-rodriguez, E., and Martinez-arias, A. (2014). Determinants of the effective tax rate in the BRIC Countries. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 50 (sup3), 214-228.

Fernandez-rodriguez, E., and Martinez-arias, A. (2012). Do business characteristics determine an effective tax rate? The Chinese Economy, 45(6), 60-83.

Fuadah, L.L., Dewi, K., Mukhtaruddin, M., Kalsum, U., and Arisman, A. (2022). The relationship between sustainability reporting, e-commerce, firm performance and tax avoidance with organizational culture as moderating variable in small and medium enterprises in Palembang. Sustainability, 14, 3738.

Gupta, S., and Newberry, K. (1997). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from lonngitudinal data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16, 1-34.

Hamilton, R., and Stekelberg, J. (2017). The effect of high-quality information technology on corporate tax avoidance and tax risk. Journal of Information Systems, 31(2), 83-106.

Heryana, T., Septiani, D. H., and Nugraha. (2022). Directors diversity, business strategy, sales growth on tax avoidance. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset) Vol, 14(1), 145-158.

Huang, D.-F., Chen, N.-Y., and Gao, K.-W. (2013). The tax burden of listed companies in China. Applied Financial Economics, 23(14), 1169–1183.

Indarti, M. G. K., and Widiatmoko, J. (2023). Political connections and tax avoidance: Does audit quality moderate the relationship? Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 15(2), 295-306.

Jing, H., and Li, B. (2023). Research of the fiscal and tax policies of High-tech industry in Northeast China. Paper presented at the SHS Web of Conferences, 163.

Juasrikul, S., dan Vandenberg, P. (2022). Thailand’s evolving ecosystem support for technology startups. Phillipines: Asian Development Bank.

Kang, S.S., and Ngo, T. (2012). Tech untaxed: Tax avoidance in silicon valley, and how america’s richest company pays a lower tax rate than you do. California, the USA: The Greenlining Institute.

Kim, J., and Im, C. (2017). Study on corporate social responsibility (CSR): Focus on tax avoidance and financial ratio analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(10), 1–16.

La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, Florencio Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and Finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.

Mao, C. W., and Wu, W. C. (2019). Moderated mediation effects of corporate social responsibility performance on tax avoidance: evidence from China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26(1–2), 90–107.

Porcano, T.M. (1986). Corporate Tax Rates: Progressive, Proportional, or Regresive. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 7(2), 17-31.

Rachmad, Y., and Yusmita, F. (2023). What Motivates Companies to Avoid Tax? Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 15(1), 89-98.

Richardson, G., and Lanis, R. (2007). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates and tax reform: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(6), 689–704.

Saragih, A.H., Ali, S., Suwardi, E., and Utomo, H. (2024) Finding the missing pieces to an optimal corporate tax savings: Information technology governance and internal information quality. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 52.

Siegfried, J.J. (1972). The relationship between economic structure and the effect of political influence: Empirical evidence from the federal corporation income tax program. The University of Wisoonsin.

Sun, W., Yin, K., and Liu, Z. (2021). Tax Incentives, RandD Manipulation, and Corporate Innovation Performance: Evidence from Listed Companies in China. Sustainability, 13, 11819.

Tandean, V. A., and Winnie, W. (2016). The effect of good corporate governance on tax avoidance: An empirical study on manufacturing companies listed in IDX period 2010-2013. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 1(1), 28–38.

Wang, F., Xu, S., Sun, J., and Cullinan, C. P. (2020). Corporate tax avoidance: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(4), 793–811.

Yang, J. G. S., and Metallo, V. N. A. (2018). The emerging international taxation problems. International Journal of Financial Studies, 6(1), 1–11.

Yang, J.G.S., and Aquilino, F.J. (2017). Taking Advantage of A Tax Loophole in the High-Tech Industry. Practical Tax Strategies.

Yoon, S. M., Jiang, E. L., and Cui, Y. (2023). Tax policies for high-tech companies and tax avoidance in China. International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, 16(2), 308–318.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v16i1.63618

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View My Stats Visitor