PENGEMBANGAN TERBATAS TES DIAGNOSTIK FORCE CONCEPT INVENTORY BERFORMAT FOUR-TIER TEST
Abstract
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Arslan, A.S., Devecioglu, Y. (2010). Student Teachers’ Levels of Understanding and Model of Understanding about Newton’s Laws of Motion. Asia-Pacific on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1): 1-20.
Gurel, D.K., Eryilmaz A., McDermott, L.C. (2015). A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5): 989-1008.
Uyulgan, M.A., Akkuzu, N., Alpat, S. (2014). Assesing the Students’ Understanding Related to Molecular Geometry Using A Two-Tier Diagnostic Test. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(6): 839-855.
Pesman, H., Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of Three-Tier Test to Assess Misconceptions about Simple Electric Circuits. Journal of Educational Research, 103: 208-222.
Ismail, I.I., Samsudin, A., Suhendi, E., Kaniawati, I. (2015). Diagnostik Miskonsepsi Melalui Listrik Dinamis Four Tier Test. In Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains 2015, 381-384. Bandung, Ina.: Simposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains.
Caleon, J.S., Subramaniam, R. (2010). Do Students Know What They Know and What They Don’t Know? Using a Four-Tier Test to Assess the Nature of Students’ Alternative Conceptions. Research in Science Education, 40: 313-337.
Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development and Application of Three-Tier Heat and Temperature Test: Sample of Bachelor and Graduate Students. Eurasian Journal of Research, 40(40): 53-76.
Chu, H.E., Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2009). A Stratified Study of Students’ Understanding of Basic Optics Concepts in Different Contexts Using a Two-Tier Multiple-choice Items. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27(3), 253-265.
Caleon, I.S., Subramaniam, R. (2010). Development and Application of a Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Secondary Students’ Understanding of Waves. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7): 939-961.
Thornton, R.K., Sokoloff, D.R., (1998). Assessing Student Learning of Newton’s Laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula. American Journal of Physics, 66(4): 338-352.
Demirci, N. (2005). A Study about Students’ Misconceptions in Force and Motion Concepts by Incorporating a Web-Assisted Physics Program. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(3): 40-48.
Bayraktar, S. (2006). Misconceptions of Turkish Pre-Service Teachers about Force and Motion. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7: 273-291.
Blas, M.T., Seidel, L., Fernandes, A.S. (2010) Enhancing Force Concept Inventory Diagnostics to Identify Dominant Misconceptions in First-Year Engineering Physics. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(6): 597-606.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30: 141-158.
Plomp, T. eds. (1997). Educational and Training System Design. Reading, Neth.: Engn Shede.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v2i1.4903
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Wahana Pendidikan Fisika
The Journal Wahana Pendidikan Fisika http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/WapFi/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
The Journal WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika).
All rights reserverd. pISSN 2338-1027 eISSN 2685-4414
Copyright © Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education (FPMIPA) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)