Assessment of Students' Absorption of Printed Graphic Design Material Using the Blended Learning Model

Nurul Audina

Abstract


This research is motivated by the problems that researchers encountered in the field, namely the student absorption of Printed Graphic Design, is still lacking. Therefore, there is a need for a learning model that can help improve students understanding of the material combining vector-based image and text. One of the alternatives used by researchers to overcome this problem during the Covid-19 period is by using a blended learning model. This study aims to prove the doubts about student’ understanding ability of Printed Graphic Design materials. To achieve good results participants used the class action research method from Kurt Lewin, which states that in one cycle there are four main steps, namely (1) planning, (2) action, (3) observation, (4) reflection. The learning outcomes of the first cycle were not in line with expectations because students who scored ≥ 75 is only 22.86%, while the expected value if students who scored ≥ 75 had achieved completeness ≥ 75%. Meanwhile in cycle II, there is an increase in learning outcomes where the results are in accordance with expectations because students who score ≥ 75 are more than 75% of the total number of students, which is 100%.

Keywords


Absorption; Blended learning; Printed Graphic Design

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dewi, C. (2017). Peningkatan keterampilan berbicara dalam bermain drama melalui model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe inside-outside circle. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran, 3(2), 567-575.

Dobrzański, L. A., and Brom, F. (2008). E-learning on the example of materials science. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 29(1), 99-102.

Enriquez, M. A. S. (2014). Students’ perceptions on the effectiveness of the use of edmodo as a supplementary tool for learning. DLSU Research Congress, 2(6), 1-6.

Gikas, J., and Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones, and social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18-26.

Hakim, A. B. (2016). Efektifitas penggunaan e-learning moodle, google classroom dan edmodo. Jurnal I-Statement, 2(1), 1-6.

Kartiningsih, N. (2019). Cooperative learning tipe CIRC berbasis penemuan untuk meningkatkan keterampilan dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita materi kesebangunan siswa kelas IX E SMP Negeri 1 Kedungbanteng Kabupaten Tegal: Array. Dialektika Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(2), 256-265.

Korucu, A. T., and Alkan, A. (2011). Differences between m-learning (mobile learning) and e-learning, basic terminology, and usage of m-learning in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1925-1930.

Kumar, V., and Nanda, P. (2019). Social media in higher education: A framework for continuous engagement. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 15(1), 97-108.

Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., and Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?. The Internet and higher education, 14(2), 129-135.

Romiyadi, R. (2009). Peningkatan hasil belajar fisika pokok bahasan listrik dinamis melalui pendekatan contextual teaching and learning pada siswa kelas ix semester i smp negeri 21 semarang tahun pelajaran 2008/2009. Media Penelitian Pendidikan: Jurnal Penelitian dalam Bidang Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 3(2), 74-82.

Vera, S., and Hambali, R. Y. A. (2021). Aliran rasionalisme dan empirisme dalam kerangka ilmu pengetahuan. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ushuluddin, 1(2), 59-73.

Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., and Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning?. Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75-79.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jgrkom.v2i2.63957

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.