ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PENDIDIKAN KARAKTER
Abstract
Keberhasilan pendidikan karakter tidak dapat dilepaskan dari kebijakan, sistem pengelolaan program serta penjaminan mutu internal. Pada praktiknya, kebijakan tidak sesuai dengan identifikasi masalah. Penjaminan mutu pendidikan karakter sulit diterapkan akibat lemahnya kecukupan syarat seperti anggaran serta SDM. Tujuan penelitian 1) mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis implementasi kebijakan Pendidikan Karakter, 2) mengembangkan model hipotetik sistem penjaminan mutu internal dalam pendidikan karakter. Metode penelitian deskriptif kualitatif studi kasus. Sumber data menggunakan purposive sampling dan snowball technique. Analisis data menggunakan constructionist analysis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan kebijakan pendidikan disusun berdasarkan visi serta tujuan sekolah dengan karakteristik dan program berbeda. SD Tzu Chi menekankan pada kemandirian dan kebermaknaan individu, SD Mutiara Bangsa fokus pada toleransi, SDN 07 Jelambar fokus pada nilai religius. Masalah utama dalam penjaminan mutu adalah anggaran, belum optimalnya riset dan pengembangan praktik, sistem informasi, serta SDM guru .
The success of character education can not be separated from the policy, management systems and internal quality assurance program. In practice, the policy is not appropriate with the identification problem. Character education quality assurance difficult to implement. Because budgetary requirements HR. Aims of this tudy 1) describe and analyze the implementation of character education policy, 2) develop a hypothetical model of internal quality assurance system in character education. Descriptive research method qualitative study case. Data sources are purposive sampling and snowball technique. Analysis of data used constructionist analysis. The results showed education policy is based on the vision and goals of the school with characteristics and different programs. SD Tzu Chi emphasis on self-reliance and individual significance, SD MB focus on tolerance, SDN 07 Jelambar focus on religious values. The main problem in quality assurance is the budget, not optimal research and development practices, information systems, and human resource.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Bahm,K.L (2012). The Integration Of Character Education And Its Impact On teachers’ professional practice. University of missouri-st. Louis. Dissertation
Berkowitz,M.W. dan Bustamante,A (2013). Using research to set priorities for character education in schools: A global perspective. KJEP Special Issue (2013) hlm. 7
Blanchard , K dan Stoner, J (2004). The Vision Thing: Without It You’ll Never Be a World-Class Organization. Leader to Leader. 2 (2) hlm.21-28
Budimansyah, Dasim (2010). Pendidikan Karakter, Bandung. Alpabeta
Cha. S.H. (2013). Restructuring the concept of character education and policy in Korea. KJEP Special Issue. hlm. 51-63
Dunn, WN( 2005). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik, UGM Press, Yogyakarta.
Huet et al (2011). Linking a Research Dimension to an Internal Quality Assurance System to Enhance Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 29 947 – 956
Megawangi (2004). Pendidikan karakter. Jakarta. Yayasan Obor
Koeseome. D. (2011). Pendidikan Karakter. Yogyakarta: Kanisius
Lickona (2000). Talks About Character Education. Scholastic Early Childhood Today. ProQuest Research Library 14 (7)
Lumby, J (2011). Enjoyment and learning: policy and secondary school learners’ experience in England. British Educational Research Journal 37 (2) hlm. 247–264
Materu, P,N (2007). Status, Challenges, Opportunities, and Promising Practices.Washington DC.World Bank Working paper no . 124
Ng. P.T. (2007). Quality assurance in the Singapore education system in an era of diversity and innovation. Educ Res Policy Prac, 2 (6) hlm. 235–247.
Paudel,N.R (2009). A Critical Account of Policy Implementation Theories: Status and Reconsideration. Nepalese Journal of Public Policy and Governance, 25 (2)36-54
Pitt.S.A (2014). Internal Audit Quality Developing a Quality Assurance and Improvement Program. New Jersey. Wiley
Purushotama, B ( 2010). Effective implementation of quality management systems. India. Woodhead Publishing
Reichenba¨cher, M dan Einax, J.,W (2011). Challenges in Analytical Quality Assurance. NY: Springer
Sallis E. (2005). Total Quality Management in Education. UK: Kogan Page.
Saghafi.A. dan Shatalebi.B. (2012). Analyzing The Role Of Teachers In The Nature Character Education Of Students From The Attitudes Of Them. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (OMAN Chapter) 1(7) hlm 54-59
Skyes, G et al. Penyunting (2009). Handbook of Education Policy Research. NY. Routledge.
Watzh, M.,H (2010). An Assessment Of Character Education In New York State. A Dissertation. D'Youville College
Wildi et al (2002). The International Study Leadership in Education. Journal of education Administration.42 (4) hlm 416-430
Williams H.,R.,S (2010). Widening the Lens to Teach Character Education Alongside Standards Curriculum. The Clearing House, 83 (4) : hlm 115–120
Yonezawa,A (2002). The quality assurance system and market forces in Japanese higher education. Higher Education 43: 127–139
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v21i2.6676
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan
ISSN: p.1412-8152 e.2580-1007
Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan is issued by Program Studi Administrasi Pendidikan Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats