Biogas Effectiveness Test from Household Waste (Vegetable Waste) with Cow Dung Starter and EM4

Rizka Nurfarida Mukti, Adinda Salsabilla, Aina Salsabila Muamar, Eka Cahya Prima, Muhammad Nurul Hana

Abstract


This research focuses on finding solutions to get around the energy crisis. This study aimed to know the effectiveness of household waste (vegetable waste) biogas using a starter mixture of cow dung and EM4. What is new from this research is the use of household waste as biogas energy. The research method used is the study of literature from various journals and articles, accurate and reliable. Various journals and conceptual articles were obtained from google scholar and the liputan6.com website page. From the experimental results, the more the composition of vegetable waste, the higher the pressure, but the less the flame. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that biogas made from vegetable waste alone is quite effective to be used as a solution to the energy crisis problem (to replace LPJ gas, to be precise) because of the large amount of methane produced. However, if we are want to be an innovation for successful village development, biogas from household waste (vegetable waste) can be used by adding cow dung as the main ingredient. So that methane is produced in large quantities according to the amount of material used.

Keywords


Biogas, Effectiveness, Methane, Vegetable waste

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmed, J., Gultekinoglu, M., and Edirisinghe, M. (2020). Bacterial cellulose micro-nano fibres for wound healing applications. Biotechnology Advances, 107549.

Azhar, M., and Satriawan, D. A. (2018). Implementasi kebijakan energi baru dan energi terbarukan dalam rangka ketahanan energi nasional. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 1(4), 398-412.

Bouallagui, H., Cheikh, R. B., Marouani, L., and Hamdi, M. (2003). Mesophilic biogas production from fruit and vegetable waste in a tubular digester. Bioresource Technology, 86(1), 85-89.

Dach, J., Boniecki, P., Przybył, J., Janczak, D., Lewicki, A., Czekała, W., ... and Cieślik, M. (2014). Energetic efficiency analysis of the agricultural biogas plant in 250 kWe experimental installation. Energy, 69, 34-38.

Dubinin, A. M., and Mavrin, S. P. (2014). Transformation of coals into electricity and heat. Thermal Engineering, 61(7), 491-496.

He, P., Zhao, L., Zheng, W., Wu, D., and Shao, L. (2013). Energy balance of a biodrying process for organic wastes of high moisture content: a review. Drying Technology, 31(2), 132-145.

Jacob, T. (2017). Competing energy narratives in Tanzania: towards the political economy of coal. African Affairs, 116(463), 341-353.

Karthikeyan, O. P., and Visvanathan, C. (2013). Bio-energy recovery from high-solid organic substrates by dry anaerobic bio-conversion processes: a review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 12(3), 257-284.

Lăzăroiu, G., Mavrodin, E. M., Bondrea, A. D., Mihaescu, L., and Mocanu, R. (2017). Biogas production–future solution in management of tanneries wastes. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM, 17, 97-102.

Lombardi, L., and Carnevale, E. (2013). Economic evaluations of an innovative biogas upgrading method with CO2 storage. Energy, 62, 88-94.

Mani, S., Sundaram, J., and Das, K. C. (2016). Process simulation and modeling: anaerobic digestion of complex organic matter. Biomass and Bioenergy, 93, 158-167.

Meidiana, C., and Gamse, T. (2010). Development of waste management practices in Indonesia. European Journal of Scientific Research, 40(2), 199-210.

Perera, F. (2018). Pollution from fossil-fuel combustion is the leading environmental threat to global pediatric health and equity: solutions exist. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(1), 16.

Perera, F. P. (2017). Multiple threats to child health from fossil fuel combustion: impacts of air pollution and climate change. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(2), 141-148.

Qiao, W., Yan, X., Ye, J., Sun, Y., Wang, W., and Zhang, Z. (2011). Evaluation of biogas production from different biomass wastes with/without hydrothermal pretreatment. Renewable Energy, 36(12), 3313-3318.

Ratnaningsih, R., Widyatmoko, H., and Yananto, T. (2009). Potensi pembentukan biogas pada proses biodegradasi campuran sampah organik segar dan kotoran sapi dalam batch reaktor anaerob. Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan Universitas Trisakti, 5(1), 19-26.

Villadsen, S. N., Fosbøl, P. L., Angelidaki, I., Woodley, J. M., Nielsen, L. P., and Møller, P. (2019). The potential of biogas; the solution to energy storage. ChemSusChem, 12(10), 2147-2153.

Vohra, K., Vodonos, A., Schwartz, J., Marais, E. A., Sulprizio, M. P., and Mickley, L. J. (2021). Global mortality from outdoor fine particle pollution generated by fossil fuel combustion: results from GEOS-Chem. Environmental Research, 195, 110754.

Widayana, G. (2012). Pemanfaatan energi surya. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 9(1), 37-46.

Widyastuti, S., and Suyantara, Y. (2017). Penambah an sampah sayuran pada fermentasi biogas dari kotoran sapi dengan starter EM4. WAKTU: Jurnal Teknik UNIPA, 15(1), 36-42.

Yenigün, O., and Demirel, B. (2013). Ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion: a review. Process Biochemistry, 48(5-6), 901-911.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijomr.v1i1.33779

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 1970 Kantor Jurnal dan Publikasi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Research (IJOMR) is published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)