Email this article 
Exploring Technology-Driven Simulations in Practical Physics: Insights into Mechanical Measurements Concept
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of technology-driven simulations in improving high school students' practical skills in mechanical measurement within the context of physics education. A quasi-experimental design was employed, involving control groups and pretest-posttest samples to assess students' understanding and application of mechanical measurement concepts. The results indicate that simulations significantly enhance students' accuracy and comprehension of mechanical measurements compared to traditional teaching methods. Notably, visual and kinesthetic learners benefit the most from using simulations prior to engaging in physical experiments. The combination of simulations and hands-on experiments was found to be more effective in developing practical skills than either approach alone. These findings underscore the value of integrating technology-driven simulations into physics curricula, particularly for enhancing learning outcomes and practical skills in mechanical measurement, with a specific advantage for learners with visual and kinesthetic preferences.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abosede, P.J., Onasanya, S.A., and Ngozi, O.C. (2024). Students’ self-assessment of demonstration-based flipped classroom on senior secondary school students’ performance in physics. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 4(1), 27-40.
Al Husaeni, D. F., Al Husaeni, D. N., Nandiyanto, A. B. D., Rokhman, M., Chalim, S., Chano, J., Al-Obaidi, A. S. M., and Roestamy, M. (2024). How technology can change educational research? definition, factors for improving quality of education and computational bibliometric analysis. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 4(2), 127-166.
Al Husaeni, D.N. (2022). Development analysis research on physics education by mapping keywords using the VOSviewer application. ASEAN Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 1(1), 9-18.
Alsalhi, N., Alqawasmi, A. A., El-Saleh, M. S., Balawi, M., Ali, B. B. J., Alzboun, N., and Al Gharaibeh, F. (2024). Comparative effects of phet interactive simulations and conventional laboratory methods (CLM) on basic science process skills (BSPS) in physics: A case study in secondary school. Arts Educa, 40. 60-71
Azizah, E.V., Nandiyanto, A.B.D., Kurniawan, T., and Bilad, M.R. (2022). The effectiveness of using a virtual laboratory in distance learning on the measurement materials of the natural sciences of physics for junior high school students. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 2(3), 207-214.
Baneres, D., Whitelock, D., Ras, E., Karadeniz, A., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., and Rodriguez, M. E. (2019). Technology enhanced learning or learning driven by technology. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(5), 26-40.
Bhute, V. J., Inguva, P., Shah, U., and Brechtelsbauer, C. (2021). Transforming traditional teaching laboratories for effective remote delivery—a review. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35, 96-104.
Bjerrum, F., Thomsen, A. S. S., Nayahangan, L. J., and Konge, L. (2018). Surgical simulation: Current practices and future perspectives for technical skills training. Medical Teacher, 40(7), 668-675.
Cai, S., Liu, C., Wang, T., Liu, E., and Liang, J. C. (2021). Effects of learning physics using augmented reality on students’ self‐efficacy and conceptions of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 235-251.
Chen, L., Wu, H., Fang, Q., and Li, R. (2021). Full-scale experimental study of a reinforced concrete bridge pier under truck collision. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 26(8), 1-28.
Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T., and Fischer, F. (2020). simulation-based learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 499-541.
Fitriyawany, F., Julita, F., and Mustika, C. R. (2023). Development of e-module based on simulation phet fluid material dynamic in senior high school. Asian Journal of Science Education, 5(2), 39-47.
Georgiou, Y., Tsivitanidou, O., and Ioannou, A. (2021). Learning experience design with immersive virtual reality in physics education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(6), 3051-3080.
Henukh, A., Rosdianto, H., and Oikawa, S. (2020). Implementation of google classroom as multimedia learning. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika, 5(1), 38-44.
Hofmann, R., Curran, S., and Dickens, S. (2021). Models and measures of learning outcomes for non-technical skills in simulation-based medical education: Findings from an integrated scoping review of research and content analysis of curricular learning objectives. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71, 1-17.
Hsu, C. Y., and Wu, T. T. (2023). Application of business simulation games in flipped classrooms to facilitate student engagement and higher-order thinking skills for sustainable learning practices. Sustainability, 15(24), 1-18.
Ibrahim, A.O. (2023). Impact of blended learning method on secondary school physics students’ achievement and retention in Lokoja, Nigeria. ASEAN Journal for Science Education, 2(2), 57-66.
Ismail, I., Permanasari, A., and Setiawan, W. (2016). Stem virtual lab: An alternative practical media to enhance student’s scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 239-246.
Jamil, M. G., and Isiaq, S. O. (2019). Teaching technology with technology: Approaches to bridging learning and teaching gaps in simulation-based programming education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-21.
Jasti, N. V. K., Kota, S., and PB, V. (2021). An impact of simulation labs on engineering students' academic performance: A critical Investigation. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(1), 103-126.
Kade, A., Degeng, I., and Ali, M. (2019). Effect of jigsaw strategy and learning style to conceptual understanding on senior high school students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(19), 4-15.
Ke, F., and Xu, X. (2020). Virtual reality simulation‐based learning of teaching with alternative perspectives taking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2544-2557.
Lamb, R., and Etopio, E. A. (2020). Virtual reality: A tool for preservice science teachers to put theory into practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(4), 573-585.
Lavoie, P., Lapierre, A., Maheu-Cadotte, M. A., Fontaine, G., Khetir, I., and Bélisle, M. (2022). transfer of clinical decision-making–related learning outcomes following simulation-based education in nursing and medicine: A scoping review. Academic Medicine, 97(5), 738-746.
Lestari, D.A., Suwarma, I.R., and Suhendi, E. (2024). Feasibility analysis of the development of stem-based physics e-book with self-regulated learning on global warming topics. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 4(1), 1-10.
Lovelace, K. J., Eggers, F., and Dyck, L. R. (2016). I do and I understand: Assessing the utility of web-based management simulations to develop critical thinking skills. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 15(1), 100-121.
May, D., Terkowsky, C., Varney, V., and Boehringer, D. (2023). Between hands-on experiments and cross reality learning environments–contemporary educational approaches in instructional laboratories. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(5), 783-801.
Menon, D., Chandrasekhar, M., Kosztin, D., and Steinhoff, D. C. (2020). Impact of mobile technology‐based physics curriculum on preservice elementary teachers' technology self‐efficacy. Science Education, 104(2), 252-289.
Morse, C., Fey, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., Mullen, A., Barlow, M., and Barwick, S. (2019). The changing landscape of simulation-based education. American Journal of Nursing, 119(8), 42-48.
Novia, N., Riandi, R., Permanasari, A., Kaniawati, I., and Ardiyanto, D. (2021). Examining disaster literacy through modified earthquake laboratory experiment on STEM learning. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 16, 81-8.
Ropawandi, D., Halim, L., and Husnin, H. (2022). Augmented reality (AR) technology-based learning: the effect on physics learning during the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(2), 132-140.
Scholtz, F., and Hughes, S. (2021). A systematic review of educator interventions in facilitating simulation based learning. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(5), 1408-1435.
Simić, B., Mešić, V., Đapo, N., Šapić, I. M., Vidak, A., Alić, A., and Erceg, N. (2023). Simulation-based and video-based approaches to diversifying physics homework. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(3), 506-519.
Sullivan, S., Gnesdilow, D., Puntambekar, S., and Kim, J. S. (2017). Middle school students’ learning of mechanics concepts through engagement in different sequences of physical and virtual experiments. International Journal of Science Education, 39(12), 1573-1600.
Supriyadi, S., Suhandi, A., Samsudin, A, Setiawan, A., Algiranto, A., and Loupatty, M. (2023). Trends on augmented reality in education: Bibliometric analysis and visualization using R studio. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 18(6), 61-69.
Susilowati, N.I., Liliawati, W., and Rusdiana, D. (2023). Science process skills test instruments in the new indonesian curriculum (merdeka): Physics subject in renewable energy topic. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 3(2), 121-132.
Walsh, Y., Magana, A. J., and Feng, S. (2020). Investigating students’ explanations about friction concepts after interacting with a visuohaptic simulation with two different sequenced approaches. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29, 443-458.
Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S., and Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821-842.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ajse.v4i3.74411
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.